Suppr超能文献

在使用手动器械进行无限制卡尺验证的运动学对线全膝关节置换术中,外科医生经验对准确性和操作时间的影响可忽略不计。

Negligible effect of surgeon experience on the accuracy and time to perform unrestricted caliper verified kinematically aligned TKA with manual instruments.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California at Davis, 451 E. Health Sciences Drive, Room 2303,, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, König-Ludwig-Haus, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Sep;30(9):2966-2974. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-06939-y. Epub 2022 Apr 2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Surgeons performing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are interested in the accuracy and time it takes to make the four femoral resections that determine the setting of the femoral component. A method for quantifying the error of each resection is the thickness, measured by a caliper, minus the femoral target. The present study tested the hypothesis that the mean deviation of the resection from the femoral target, the percentage of resections with a deviation of ± 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mm, and the time to complete the femoral cuts were not different between experienced (E) and less-experienced (LE) surgeons performing unrestricted caliper verified kinematically aligned (KA) TKA with manual instruments.

METHODS

This study analyzed intraoperative verification worksheets from 203 patients treated by ten E surgeons and 58 patients treated by four LE surgeons. The worksheet recorded (1) the thickness of the femoral target for the distal medial (DM), distal lateral (DL), posterior medial (PM), and posterior lateral (PL) resections and the caliper thickness of the resections with a resolution of 0.5 mm, and (2) the time to complete them. The most accurate resection has a mean difference ± standard deviation of 0 ± 0.0 mm.

RESULTS

The accuracy of the 1044 initial resections (261 patients) was significantly closer to the femoral target for E vs. the LE surgeons: 0.0 ± 0.4 vs. - 0.3 ± 0.5 for the DM, 0.0 ± 0.5 vs. - 0.4 ± 0.6 for the DL, - 0.1 ± 0.5 vs. - 0.2 ± 0.5 PM, and - 0.1 ± 0.5 vs. - 0.4 ± 0.6 for the PL resections (p ≤ 0.0248). E surgeons completed the femoral resections in 12 min; 5 min faster than LE surgeons (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Because the mean difference in femoral resections with manual instruments for E vs. LE surgeons was < 0.5 mm which is within the caliper's resolution, differences in accuracy were not clinically relevant. Surgeons exploring other alignment options and robotic, navigation, and patient-specific instrumentation might find these values helpful when deciding to change.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; case-control study.

摘要

目的

进行全膝关节置换术(TKA)的外科医生对确定股骨组件设置的四个股骨截骨术的准确性和时间感兴趣。一种量化每个截骨术误差的方法是用卡尺测量的厚度减去股骨目标厚度。本研究检验了以下假设,即经验丰富(E)和经验较少(LE)的外科医生使用手动器械进行不受限制的卡尺验证的运动学对准(KA)TKA 时,从股骨目标的截骨术平均偏差、偏差为 ±0.5、1.0、1.5 和 2.0mm 的截骨术百分比以及完成股骨切割的时间没有差异。

方法

本研究分析了由 10 名 E 外科医生治疗的 203 名患者和 4 名 LE 外科医生治疗的 58 名患者的术中验证工作表。工作表记录了(1)股骨远端内侧(DM)、远端外侧(DL)、后内侧(PM)和后外侧(PL)截骨术的股骨目标厚度以及截骨术的卡尺厚度,分辨率为 0.5mm;(2)完成它们所需的时间。最准确的截骨术的平均差值为 ±0.0 毫米。

结果

261 名患者的 1044 个初始截骨术的准确性明显接近 E 组与 LE 组的股骨目标:DM 为 0.0±0.4 毫米与 -0.3±0.5 毫米,DL 为 0.0±0.5 毫米与-0.4±0.6 毫米,PM 为-0.1±0.5 毫米与-0.2±0.5 毫米,PL 为-0.1±0.5 毫米与-0.4±0.6 毫米(p≤0.0248)。E 组外科医生完成股骨截骨术的时间为 12 分钟,比 LE 组快 5 分钟(p<0.0001)。

结论

由于 E 组与 LE 组使用手动器械的股骨截骨术的平均差值<0.5 毫米,在卡尺的分辨率范围内,因此准确性的差异不具有临床意义。探索其他对准选项以及机器人、导航和患者特定器械的外科医生在决定更改时可能会发现这些值有所帮助。

证据水平

III;病例对照研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c4f/9418297/0c2d75a0a9db/167_2022_6939_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验