• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《危机工具箱》的可接受性:在 COVID-19 期间,在危机解决和家庭治疗团队中提供的一项基于技能的干预措施。

Acceptability of the 'Crisis Toolbox': a skills-based intervention delivered in a Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment Team during COVID-19.

机构信息

Atherleigh Park Hospital, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Atherleigh Way, WN7 1YN, Leigh, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Community Ment Health J. 2022 Nov;58(8):1487-1494. doi: 10.1007/s10597-022-00963-5. Epub 2022 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1007/s10597-022-00963-5
PMID:35366118
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8976273/
Abstract

Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment Teams (CRHTTs) provide 24-hour, seven day per week support for people in crisis. The COVID-19 pandemic has placed significant demand on urgent care and increased the need for brief interventions in CRHTT settings with flexible methods of delivery. This evaluation aimed to examine client satisfaction with the 'Crisis Toolbox' (CTB), a brief, skills-based intervention delivered in one CRHTT during COVID-19. All participants who received the CTB completed a satisfaction questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were calculated to quantify acceptability and qualitative themes were generated using thematic analysis. Fifty-eight people participated, all of whom reported high levels of satisfaction with the CTB. Four qualitative themes also emerged relating to 'Active ingredients of the CTB', 'The therapeutic relationship', 'Service-user preferences' and 'Expectations and continuity of care'. The CTB appears to be a valued intervention. Further research is now needed to assess its clinical impact and effect on operational indicators.

摘要

危机解决和家庭治疗团队(CRHTT)为处于危机中的人们提供每周 7 天、每天 24 小时的支持。COVID-19 大流行对紧急护理提出了巨大需求,并增加了在 CRHTT 环境中采用灵活的交付方式进行短暂干预的需求。本评估旨在检查“危机工具箱”(CTB)的客户满意度,这是在 COVID-19 期间在一个 CRHTT 中提供的简短、基于技能的干预措施。所有接受 CTB 的参与者都完成了一份满意度问卷。使用描述性统计数据来量化可接受性,并使用主题分析生成定性主题。共有 58 人参与,他们都对 CTB 表示高度满意。还出现了四个定性主题,涉及“CTB 的有效成分”、“治疗关系”、“服务使用者偏好”和“期望和护理连续性”。CTB 似乎是一种有价值的干预措施。现在需要进一步研究来评估其对临床指标的影响和效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23c8/8976273/94d49df9525e/10597_2022_963_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23c8/8976273/94d49df9525e/10597_2022_963_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23c8/8976273/94d49df9525e/10597_2022_963_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Acceptability of the 'Crisis Toolbox': a skills-based intervention delivered in a Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment Team during COVID-19.《危机工具箱》的可接受性:在 COVID-19 期间,在危机解决和家庭治疗团队中提供的一项基于技能的干预措施。
Community Ment Health J. 2022 Nov;58(8):1487-1494. doi: 10.1007/s10597-022-00963-5. Epub 2022 Apr 2.
2
Clinical Effects of the 'Crisis Toolbox' (CTB): A Brief, Skills Based, Intervention Delivered in a Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment Team.“危机工具箱”(CTB)的临床效果:一项简短的、基于技能的干预措施,由危机解决和家庭治疗小组提供。
Community Ment Health J. 2023 Aug;59(6):1172-1180. doi: 10.1007/s10597-023-01100-6. Epub 2023 Mar 26.
3
A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis Examining the Facilitators and Barriers of Psychological Intervention Delivery in Crisis Resolution Home Treatment Teams.一项系统评价和叙述性综合研究,探讨了危机解决家庭治疗团队中心理干预实施的促进因素和障碍。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2024 Jul-Aug;31(4):e3032. doi: 10.1002/cpp.3032.
4
Accompanying mental health problems at home: Preliminary data from a crisis resolution and home treatment team in Catalonia.居家时伴随出现的心理健康问题:来自加泰罗尼亚危机解决与居家治疗团队的初步数据。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2023 Oct;30(5):974-982. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12918. Epub 2023 Mar 25.
5
Treating mental health crises at home: Patient satisfaction with home nursing care.居家心理健康危机处理:患者对家庭护理服务的满意度。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Jun;27(3):246-257. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12573. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
6
The CORE service improvement programme for mental health crisis resolution teams: results from a cluster-randomised trial.精神科危机干预小组的 CORE 服务改进项目:一项群组随机试验的结果。
Br J Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;216(6):314-322. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.21.
7
Nurses' Experiences of Care at Crisis Resolution Home Treatment Teams: A case study research.危机解决家庭治疗团队中护士的护理体验:一项案例研究
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2022 Feb;29(1):48-56. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12738. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
8
9
The clinical impact of a crisis resolution home treatment team.危机解决家庭治疗团队的临床影响。
Ir J Psychol Med. 2023 Nov 6:1-8. doi: 10.1017/ipm.2023.45.
10
[Patient and their relatives' satisfaction regarding a home-based crisis intervention provided by a mobile crisis team].[患者及其亲属对移动危机干预小组提供的居家危机干预的满意度]
Encephale. 2005 Mar-Apr;31(2):127-41. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82380-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Professional relationships during crisis interventions: A scoping review.危机干预中的专业关系:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 23;19(2):e0298726. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298726. eCollection 2024.
2
Clinical Effects of the 'Crisis Toolbox' (CTB): A Brief, Skills Based, Intervention Delivered in a Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment Team.“危机工具箱”(CTB)的临床效果:一项简短的、基于技能的干预措施,由危机解决和家庭治疗小组提供。
Community Ment Health J. 2023 Aug;59(6):1172-1180. doi: 10.1007/s10597-023-01100-6. Epub 2023 Mar 26.
3
Implementation and evaluation of a model-based risk management process and service enhancement for home-based community care services amidst COVID-19 pandemic in Hong Kong: A mixed-method approach.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychological distress and adaptation to the COVID-19 crisis in the United States.美国民众的心理困扰与对新冠危机的适应。
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Apr;136:603-609. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.10.035. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
2
Addressing the public mental health challenge of COVID-19.应对新冠疫情带来的公众心理健康挑战。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Aug;7(8):657-659. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30240-6. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
3
The Role of Telehealth in Reducing the Mental Health Burden from COVID-19.远程医疗在减轻新冠疫情所致心理健康负担方面的作用
基于模型的风险管理流程的实施和评估以及在 COVID-19 大流行期间对香港居家社区护理服务的增强:混合方法。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 16;11:1070182. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1070182. eCollection 2023.
Telemed J E Health. 2020 Apr;26(4):377-379. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0068. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
4
Are there interactional differences between telephone and face-to-face psychological therapy? A systematic review of comparative studies.电话心理治疗与面对面心理治疗之间是否存在交互差异?一项比较研究的系统综述。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Mar 15;265:120-131. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.057. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
5
Effectiveness of a brief intervention aimed at increasing distress tolerance for individuals in crisis or at risk of self-harm.一种旨在提高处于危机中或有自我伤害风险的个体的痛苦耐受力的简短干预措施的有效性。
Australas Psychiatry. 2019 Dec;27(6):565-568. doi: 10.1177/1039856219848835. Epub 2019 May 15.
6
Assessment and determinants of patient satisfaction with mental health care.患者对精神卫生保健满意度的评估及决定因素
World Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;18(1):30-31. doi: 10.1002/wps.20586.
7
The impact of accommodating client preference in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis.容纳来访者偏好对心理治疗的影响:一项元分析。
J Clin Psychol. 2018 Nov;74(11):1924-1937. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22680. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
8
Crisis resolution and home treatment: structure, process, and outcome - a literature review.危机解决和家庭治疗:结构、过程和结果——文献综述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2010 Dec;17(10):881-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2010.01621.x. Epub 2010 Aug 26.
9
Developing a U.K. protocol for collaborative care: a qualitative study.制定英国协作护理协议:一项定性研究。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2006 Jul-Aug;28(4):296-305. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2006.03.005.
10
Randomised controlled trial of acute mental health care by a crisis resolution team: the north Islington crisis study.危机解决团队进行急性精神卫生保健的随机对照试验:北伊斯灵顿危机研究
BMJ. 2005 Sep 17;331(7517):599. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38519.678148.8F. Epub 2005 Aug 15.