School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China; Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2022 May 1;236:113446. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113446. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
The ecological risks of nonylphenol (NP) and tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) have received continued attention owing to their large consumption, frequently detection, adverse effects on the reproductive fitness, and lack of risk assessment technical systems. The geometric mean of the median concentrations of NP in the 22 surface waters was 0.278 μg/L, and TBBPA in the seven surface waters was 0.014 μg/L in China. The species sensitivity distribution (SSD) models were augmented by extrapolated reproductive toxicity data of native species to reduce uncertainty. The SSD models and the hazardous concentrations for 5% of species exhibited good robustness and reliability using the bootstrap method and minimum sample size determination. The acute and reproductive predicted no-effect concentrations (PNECs) were derived as 9.88 and 0.187 μg/L for NP, and 56.6 and 0.0878 μg/L for TBBPA, respectively. The risk quotients indicated that 11 of 22 locations for NP, and 3 of 7 locations for TBBPA were at high ecological risk levels based on the reproductive PNECs. Furthermore, the higher tier ecological risk assessment (ERA) based on potential affected fraction and joint probability curves indicated that the ecological risks in the four of above locations needed further concern. The ERA based on both the acute and reproductive toxicity is essential for assessing the ecological risks of NP and TBBPA, otherwise using acute PNECs only may result in an underestimation of ecological risk. The developed tiered ERA method and its framework can provide accurate, detailed, quantitative, locally applicable, and economically technical support for ERA of typical endocrine-disrupting chemicals in China.
壬基酚 (NP) 和四溴双酚 A (TBBPA) 的生态风险因其大量使用、频繁检出、对生殖健康的不良影响以及缺乏风险评估技术体系而受到持续关注。在中国的 22 个地表水中,NP 的中位数浓度几何平均值为 0.278μg/L,TBBPA 的中位数浓度几何平均值为 0.014μg/L。通过扩展本地物种的生殖毒性数据,增加物种敏感度分布 (SSD) 模型的外推,以降低不确定性。SSD 模型和 5%物种的有害浓度使用自举法和最小样本量确定法,显示出良好的稳健性和可靠性。NP 的急性和生殖预测无效应浓度 (PNEC) 分别为 9.88μg/L 和 0.187μg/L,TBBPA 的急性和生殖 PNEC 分别为 56.6μg/L 和 0.0878μg/L。风险比率表明,根据生殖 PNEC,NP 的 22 个地点中有 11 个,TBBPA 的 7 个地点中有 3 个处于高生态风险水平。此外,基于潜在影响分数和联合概率曲线的更高层次的生态风险评估 (ERA) 表明,上述四个地点的生态风险需要进一步关注。基于急性和生殖毒性的 ERA 对于评估 NP 和 TBBPA 的生态风险至关重要,否则仅使用急性 PNEC 可能会导致生态风险低估。所开发的分层 ERA 方法及其框架可为中国典型内分泌干扰物的 ERA 提供准确、详细、定量、具有地方适用性和经济技术支持。