Department of General Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.
Critical and Intensive Care, Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Injury. 2022 Jun;53(6):1987-1993. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.03.050. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
'In-home injuries' are those that occur within the house or its immediate surroundings. The literature on the prevalence and magnitude of home injuries is sparse. This study was designed to characterize the mechanisms of 'in-home' injuries and compare their outcomes with 'outside home injuries'.
The Australia-India Trauma Systems Collaboration (AITSC) Project created a multicentric registry consisting of trauma patients admitted at four urban tertiary care hospitals in India from April 2016 to March 2018. This registry data was analysed for this study. All admitted patients except for dead on arrival were included. Patients were categorised into 'in-home' and 'outside home' cohorts based on the place where the trauma occurred. The outcome measures were 30 day in-hospital mortality and the length of hospital stay. Two subgroup analyses were performed, the first comprised pediatric patients (<15 years) and the second elderly patients >64 years).
Among 9354 patients in the AITSC data registry, 8398 patients were included in the study. Out of these, 29 percent were in-home injuries, whereas the rest occurred outside home. The 30 day in-hospital mortality was 10.6 percent in the 'in-home' cohort, as compared to 13.7 percent in the 'outside home' cohort. This difference although significant on univariable analysis (p <0.01), there was no significant difference on multivariable regression analysis, after adjusting for age and injury severity score (OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.73-1.04; p = 0.15). The length of hospital stay was shorter in the home injuries group (median = 5 days; IQR = 3-12 days) compared to the outside-home group (median = 7 days; IQR = 4-14 days) (p < 0.01). In the pediatric and the elderly, on multivariable regression analysis, in-home injuries were associated with higher mortality than outside home injuries.
There was no significant difference in the 30 day in-hospital mortality amongst admitted trauma patients sustaining injuries at home or outside the home. However, in pediatric and elderly patients the chances of mortality was significantly higher when injured at home.
“居家损伤”是指在房屋内或其周围发生的损伤。关于居家损伤的发生率和严重程度的文献很少。本研究旨在描述“居家”损伤的机制,并将其结果与“居家外”损伤进行比较。
澳大利亚-印度创伤系统合作(AITSC)项目创建了一个多中心登记处,该登记处由 2016 年 4 月至 2018 年 3 月在印度 4 家城市三级保健医院住院的创伤患者组成。对该登记处的数据进行了本研究分析。除了到院即死亡的患者外,所有入院患者均被纳入。根据创伤发生的地点,患者被分为“居家”和“居家外”两组。主要观察指标为 30 天院内死亡率和住院时间。进行了两项亚组分析,第一项包括儿科患者(<15 岁),第二项包括老年患者(>64 岁)。
在 AITSC 数据登记处的 9354 名患者中,有 8398 名患者纳入本研究。其中,29%为居家损伤,其余为居家外损伤。“居家”组的 30 天院内死亡率为 10.6%,而“居家外”组为 13.7%。虽然单变量分析差异有统计学意义(p<0.01),但在调整年龄和损伤严重程度评分后,多变量回归分析差异无统计学意义(OR=0.88,95%CI=0.73-1.04;p=0.15)。与居家外损伤组相比,居家损伤组的住院时间更短(中位数=5 天;IQR=3-12 天)(p<0.01)。在儿科和老年患者中,多变量回归分析显示,居家损伤与居家外损伤相比,死亡率更高。
在因伤住院的创伤患者中,居家损伤与居家外损伤的 30 天院内死亡率无显著差异。然而,在儿科和老年患者中,居家受伤的死亡率明显更高。