Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), Økernveien 94, NO-0579, Oslo, Norway.
Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), Økernveien 94, NO-0579, Oslo, Norway.
Chemosphere. 2022 Aug;300:134476. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134476. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
The recommended test for assessing if a chemical can be biodegraded in the marine environment is performed according to the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Marine biodegradation test guideline (OECD 306). However, this test is known to generate highly variable test results when comparing interlaboratory test results for the same compound. One reason can be the relatively low bacterial content compared to the inoculum used for OECD readily biodegradation tests (OECD 301). Some of the variability in data obtained from OECD 306 tests can also be due to the flexibility on how to store the seawater inoculum before starting a test. Another variable in the seawater inoculum is the source of seawater used by different laboratories, i.e., geographical location and anthropogenic activities at the source. In this study, the effect of aging seawater and the source of seawater (sample time and depth) were investigated to determine differences in the biodegradation of the reference compound aniline. Aging the seawater before starting the test is recommended in OECD 306 to reduce the background levels of organic carbon in the water. However, it also functions to acclimatize the bacterial community from the environmental source temperature to the test temperature (normally 20 °C). Herein, the microbial community was monitored using flowcytometer during the aging process. As expected, the microbial community changed over time. In one experiment, aging significantly improved the biodegradation of aniline, while in two experiments, there was no significant difference in biodegradation. Interestingly however, there was significant variability in the biodegradation of aniline between sampling seasons and depths, even when all experiments were performed in the same lab, by the same operator and seawater obtained from the same source. This highlights the need for a more robust and consistent microbial inoculum source to reduce variability in seawater biodegradation tests.
评估一种化学物质是否能在海洋环境中生物降解的推荐测试是根据经济合作与发展组织海洋生物降解测试指南(OECD 306)进行的。然而,当比较同一化合物的实验室间测试结果时,这种测试已知会产生高度可变的测试结果。一个原因可能是与用于 OECD 易生物降解测试(OECD 301)的接种物相比,细菌含量相对较低。从 OECD 306 测试中获得的数据的一些可变性也可能是由于在开始测试之前存储海水接种物的灵活性。海水接种物的另一个变量是不同实验室使用的海水来源,即来源的地理位置和人为活动。在这项研究中,研究了老化海水和海水来源(采样时间和深度)的影响,以确定参考化合物苯胺的生物降解差异。OECD 306 建议在开始测试前老化海水,以降低水中有机碳的背景水平。然而,它还有助于使来自环境源的细菌群落适应测试温度(通常为 20°C)。在这里,使用流式细胞仪在老化过程中监测微生物群落。正如预期的那样,微生物群落随时间而变化。在一个实验中,老化显著提高了苯胺的生物降解性,而在两个实验中,生物降解没有显著差异。然而,有趣的是,即使所有实验都是在同一个实验室、由同一位操作人员进行、并且使用来自同一来源的海水,苯胺的生物降解在采样季节和深度之间仍存在显著差异。这突出表明需要更稳健和一致的微生物接种物来源,以减少海水生物降解测试的变异性。