Suppr超能文献

动静脉瘘和移植物用于血液透析通路的通畅率结果:非成熟与长期并发症之间的权衡。

Patency Outcomes of Arteriovenous Fistulas and Grafts for Hemodialysis Access: A Trade-Off between Nonmaturation and Long-Term Complications.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Kidney360. 2020 Jul 23;1(9):916-924. doi: 10.34067/KID.0000462020. eCollection 2020 Sep 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) for hemodialysis (HD) are often associated with better outcomes than arteriovenous grafts (AVGs). We aimed to investigate vascular access (VA) outcomes and assessed if AVF nonmaturation outweighs long-term complications of AVGs.

METHODS

In this multicenter, retrospective cohort study in The Netherlands, 1- and 3-year primary, primary assisted, secondary, and functional patency rates were calculated, and the incidence of adverse events and procedures was assessed. Functional patency of RCAVFs, upper arm AVFs, and AVGs was compared using Cox analyses.

RESULTS

In total, 1041 patients who received their first VA were included, of whom 863 had VAs that successfully matured. These patients were analyzed with a median follow-up of 25 months. The 1-year functional patency rates were 67%±2.0% for RCAVFs, 83%±2.0% for upper arm AVFs, and 85%±3.5% for AVGs. Three-year functional patency rates were 62%±2.0% for RCAVFs, 74%±2.0% for upper arm AVFs, and 69%±5% for AVGs. AVGs required more procedures per year (3.3 per year) of functional patency when compared with upper arm AVFs (1.8 per year).

CONCLUSIONS

The functional patency of AVFs and AVGs is comparable, although AVGs required more interventions to maintain usability for HD. The choice of VA is a trade-off between short-term advantages, favoring AVGs, and long-term advantages, favoring AVFs. Which VA is most appropriate depends on the patient's prognosis and preferences.

摘要

背景

动静脉瘘(AVF)用于血液透析(HD)通常比动静脉移植物(AVG)有更好的结果。我们旨在调查血管通路(VA)的结果,并评估 AVF 不成熟是否超过 AVG 的长期并发症。

方法

在荷兰的这项多中心、回顾性队列研究中,计算了 1 年和 3 年的原发性、原发性辅助、继发性和功能性通畅率,并评估了不良事件和手术的发生率。使用 Cox 分析比较了桡侧头静脉瘘、上臂 AVF 和 AVG 的功能性通畅率。

结果

共纳入 1041 例首次接受 VA 的患者,其中 863 例 VA 成功成熟。这些患者的中位随访时间为 25 个月。1 年的功能性通畅率分别为桡侧头静脉瘘 67%±2.0%、上臂 AVF 83%±2.0%和 AVG 85%±3.5%。3 年的功能性通畅率分别为桡侧头静脉瘘 62%±2.0%、上臂 AVF 74%±2.0%和 AVG 69%±5%。AVG 每年进行功能性通畅所需的手术次数(3.3 次/年)多于上臂 AVF(1.8 次/年)。

结论

AVF 和 AVG 的功能性通畅率相当,尽管 AVG 需要更多的干预措施来维持其用于 HD 的可用性。VA 的选择是短期优势(AVG 有利)和长期优势(AVF 有利)之间的权衡。哪种 VA 最合适取决于患者的预后和偏好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a3f/8815607/831780181799/KID.0000462020absf1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验