Inkawu Vervet Project, Mawana Game Reserve, KwaZulu Natal 3115, South Africa.
Department of Eco-Ethology, Faculty of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Rue Emile Argand 11, Neuchâtel 2000, Switzerland.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 May 23;377(1851):20210145. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0145. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
Neighbouring groups compete over access to resources and territories in between-group encounters, which can escalate into between-group conflicts (BGCs). Both the ecological characteristics of a territory and the rival's fighting ability shape the occurrence and outcome of such contests. What remains poorly understood, however, is how seasonal variability in the ecological value of a territory together with fighting ability related to the likelihood of between-group encounters and the extent to which these escalate into conflicts. To test this, we observed and followed four vervet monkey groups in the wild, and recorded the group structure (i.e. size, composition), the locations and the outcomes of 515 BGCs. We then assessed key ecological measures at these locations, such as vegetation availability (estimated from Copernicus Sentinel 2 satellite images) and the intensity of usage of these locations. We tested to what extent these factors together influenced the occurrence and outcomes of BGCs. We found that the occurrence of BGCs increased at locations with higher vegetation availability relative to the annual vegetation availability within the group's home territory. Also, groups engaging in a BGC at locations far away from their home territory were less likely to win a BGC. Regarding group structure, we found that smaller groups systematically won BGCs against larger groups, which can be explained by potentially higher rates of individual free-riding occurring in larger groups. This study sheds light on how the ecology of encounter locations in combination with a group's social characteristics can critically impact the dynamics of BGCs in a non-human primate species. This article is part of the theme issue 'Intergroup conflict across taxa'.
相邻群体在群体间相遇时争夺资源和领地,这可能会升级为群体间冲突 (BGC)。一个领地的生态特征和竞争对手的战斗能力都会影响这些竞争的发生和结果。然而,人们对以下方面的了解仍然甚少:一个领地的生态价值的季节性变化如何,以及与群体间相遇的可能性以及这些相遇升级为冲突的程度相关的战斗能力。为了检验这一点,我们在野外观察并跟踪了四个长尾猕猴群体,并记录了群体结构(即大小、组成)、群体间遭遇地点和 515 起 BGC 的结果。然后,我们评估了这些地点的关键生态措施,例如植被可用性(根据哥白尼哨兵 2 卫星图像估计)和这些地点的使用强度。我们测试了这些因素共同影响 BGC 发生和结果的程度。我们发现,与群体领地内的年度植被可用性相比,BGC 发生的地点的植被可用性越高,BGC 发生的可能性就越大。此外,在远离其领地的地点发生 BGC 的群体,不太可能赢得 BGC。关于群体结构,我们发现较小的群体系统地赢得了 BGC,而较大的群体则输掉了 BGC,这可以解释为较大的群体中个体搭便车的可能性更高。本研究揭示了相遇地点的生态学如何与群体的社会特征相结合,对非人类灵长类物种 BGC 动态产生关键影响。本文是主题为“跨分类群的群体间冲突”的特刊的一部分。