• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生态相互作用驱动社会觅食者群体规模与种群密度之间的幂律关系。

Ecological Interactions Drive a Power-Law Relationship Between Group Size and Population Density in Social Foragers.

作者信息

Rouhbakhsh Aubtin, Wright Amber N, Ferguson Jake M

机构信息

School of Life Sciences, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.

Department of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.

出版信息

Ecol Lett. 2025 Apr;28(4):e70111. doi: 10.1111/ele.70111.

DOI:10.1111/ele.70111
PMID:40177994
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11966693/
Abstract

Past work has shown that group formation in foraging animals aids in resource acquisition and reduces the number of interactions with predators. However, group formation can also increase competition for resources among group members. Here, we model how the individual costs and benefits of group formation drive group size. Our model predicts that when competition for resources occurs within and between groups, forager group size will exhibit a one-third power-law relationship with population abundance. However, if groups form due to intragroup competition and predation, we predict either a one-half power-law relationship with population abundance or a constant group size depending on the coupling between predator and prey. Using empirical data on group foraging birds and ungulates, we found a scaling relationship consistent with the one-third power-law, suggesting that hierarchical competition drives the average group size. Our results support work highlighting the importance of density-dependent group formation in maintaining population stability.

摘要

过去的研究表明,觅食动物形成群体有助于获取资源,并减少与捕食者的互动次数。然而,群体形成也会增加群体成员之间对资源的竞争。在此,我们建立模型来研究群体形成的个体成本和收益如何驱动群体规模。我们的模型预测,当群体内部和群体之间都存在对资源的竞争时,觅食者群体规模将与种群丰度呈现三分之一次幂律关系。然而,如果群体是由于群体内部竞争和捕食而形成的,根据捕食者与猎物之间的耦合关系,我们预测群体规模与种群丰度要么呈现二分之一次幂律关系,要么保持恒定。利用关于群体觅食鸟类和有蹄类动物的实证数据,我们发现了一种与三分之一次幂律相符的标度关系,这表明层级竞争驱动着平均群体规模。我们的结果支持了强调密度依赖型群体形成在维持种群稳定性方面重要性的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64e2/11966693/15ceabbc8869/ELE-28-0-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64e2/11966693/df3d8956c794/ELE-28-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64e2/11966693/847571a8d956/ELE-28-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64e2/11966693/15ceabbc8869/ELE-28-0-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64e2/11966693/df3d8956c794/ELE-28-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64e2/11966693/847571a8d956/ELE-28-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64e2/11966693/15ceabbc8869/ELE-28-0-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Ecological Interactions Drive a Power-Law Relationship Between Group Size and Population Density in Social Foragers.生态相互作用驱动社会觅食者群体规模与种群密度之间的幂律关系。
Ecol Lett. 2025 Apr;28(4):e70111. doi: 10.1111/ele.70111.
2
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
3
Interspecific carnivore competition and ungulate predation correlate with predator species richness.种间食肉动物竞争和有蹄类动物捕食与捕食者物种丰富度相关。
Ecology. 2025 Jun;106(6):e70136. doi: 10.1002/ecy.70136.
4
Ecological and intrinsic drivers of foraging parameters of Eurasian lynx at a continental scale.欧亚猞猁在大陆尺度上觅食参数的生态和内在驱动因素。
J Anim Ecol. 2025 Jan;94(1):154-167. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.14228. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
5
Evolution of foraging behaviour induces variable complexity-stability relationships in mutualist-exploiter-predator communities.觅食行为的演变在互利共生者 - 剥削者 - 捕食者群落中引发了复杂程度与稳定性之间的可变关系。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 Jul 9;21(7):e1013245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013245. eCollection 2025 Jul.
6
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
7
A global assessment of large terrestrial carnivore kill rates.大型陆生食肉动物捕杀率的全球评估。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2025 Feb;100(1):327-350. doi: 10.1111/brv.13143. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
8
Exploring the factors underlying adaptive social plasticity in foragers using an agent-based model.使用基于主体的模型探索觅食者适应性社会可塑性的潜在因素。
Integr Comp Biol. 2025 Jul 10. doi: 10.1093/icb/icaf126.
9
Steady-State and Dynamical Behavior of a PDE Model of Multilevel Selection with Pairwise Group-Level Competition.具有成对群体水平竞争的多级选择偏微分方程模型的稳态和动力学行为
Bull Math Biol. 2025 Jun 19;87(7):97. doi: 10.1007/s11538-025-01476-4.
10
Food-safety trade-offs drive dynamic behavioural antipredator responses among snowshoe hares.食品安全的权衡会促使雪兔的动态行为防御反应发生变化。
J Anim Ecol. 2024 Nov;93(11):1710-1721. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.14183. Epub 2024 Sep 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Ungulate Diversity and Biomass Change With Human Use and Drought: Implications for Community Stability and Protected Area Prioritization in African Savannas.有蹄类动物多样性及生物量随人类活动和干旱的变化比较:对非洲稀树草原群落稳定性和保护区优先排序的影响
Ecol Evol. 2025 Aug 28;15(9):e71946. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71946. eCollection 2025 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Drivers and outcomes of between-group conflict in vervet monkeys.群体间冲突在山魈中的驱动因素和结果。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 May 23;377(1851):20210145. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0145. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
2
Unstable population dynamics in obligate co-operators.专性共生合作体中的不稳定种群动态。
Theor Popul Biol. 2020 Dec;136:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2020.09.002. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
3
Where and when to hunt? Decomposing predation success of an ambush carnivore.在何处以及何时狩猎?剖析伏击型肉食动物的捕食成功率。
Ecology. 2020 Dec;101(12):e03172. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3172. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
4
Group density, disease, and season shape territory size and overlap of social carnivores.群体密度、疾病和季节影响着群居食肉动物的领地大小和重叠程度。
J Anim Ecol. 2021 Jan;90(1):87-101. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13294. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
5
Between-Group Competition Impacts Reproductive Success in Wild Chimpanzees.组间竞争影响野生黑猩猩的繁殖成功。
Curr Biol. 2020 Jan 20;30(2):312-318.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.11.039. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
6
On how risk and group size interact to influence vigilance.关于风险和群体规模如何相互作用影响警惕性。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2019 Dec;94(6):1918-1934. doi: 10.1111/brv.12540. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
7
Why are demographic Allee effects so rarely seen in social animals?为什么在社会性动物中很少看到人口阿利效应?
J Anim Ecol. 2018 Nov;87(6):1547-1559. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12889. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
8
Matrix Models of Hierarchical Demography: Linking Group- and Population-Level Dynamics in Cooperative Breeders.
Am Nat. 2018 Aug;192(2):188-203. doi: 10.1086/698217. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
9
Primate social group sizes exhibit a regular scaling pattern with natural attractors.灵长类动物的社会群体规模表现出与自然吸引子相关的规则比例模式。
Biol Lett. 2018 Jan;14(1). doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2017.0490.
10
Review: Allee effects in social species.综述:社会性物种中的阿利效应。
J Anim Ecol. 2018 Jan;87(1):47-58. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12759. Epub 2017 Nov 6.