Clos Pierre, Mater Adrien, Legrand Hippolyte, Poirier Gabriel, Ballay Yves, Martin Alain, Lepers Romuald
INSERM UMR 1093-CAPS, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, UFR des Sciences du Sport, Dijon, France.
Front Physiol. 2022 Mar 16;13:854824. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.854824. eCollection 2022.
How corticospinal excitability changes during eccentric locomotor exercise is unknown. In the present study, 13 volunteers performed 30-min strenuous concentric and eccentric cycling bouts at the same power output (60% concentric peak power output). Transcranial magnetic and electrical femoral nerve stimulations were applied at exercise onset (3rd min) and end (25th min). Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) amplitude was measured for the rectus femoris (RF) and vastus lateralis (VL) muscles with surface electromyography (EMG) and expressed as a percentage of maximal M-wave amplitude (M). EMG amplitude 100 ms prior to MEPs and the silent period duration were calculated. There was no change in any neural parameter during the exercises (all > 0.24). VL and RF M were unaffected by exercise modality (all > 0.38). VL MEP amplitude was greater (26 ± 11.4 vs. 15.2 ± 7.7% M; = 0.008) during concentric than eccentric cycling whereas RF MEP amplitude was not different (24.4 ± 10.8 vs. 17.2 ± 9.8% M; = 0.051). While VL EMG was higher during concentric than eccentric cycling ( = 0.03), RF EMG showed no significant difference ( = 0.07). Similar silent period durations were found (RF: 120 ± 30 ms; VL: 114 ± 27 ms; all > 0.61), but the silent period/MEP ratio was higher during eccentric than concentric cycling for both muscles (all < 0.02). In conclusion, corticospinal excitability to the knee extensors is lower and relative silent period longer during eccentric than concentric cycling, yet both remained unaltered with time.
在离心性运动锻炼过程中皮质脊髓兴奋性如何变化尚不清楚。在本研究中,13名志愿者以相同功率输出(60%向心性峰值功率输出)进行了30分钟的剧烈向心和离心循环运动。在运动开始时(第3分钟)和结束时(第25分钟)进行经颅磁刺激和股神经电刺激。使用表面肌电图(EMG)测量股直肌(RF)和股外侧肌(VL)的运动诱发电位(MEP)幅度,并表示为最大M波幅度(M)的百分比。计算MEP前100 ms的EMG幅度和静息期持续时间。运动过程中任何神经参数均无变化(均>0.24)。VL和RF的M不受运动方式影响(均>0.38)。与离心循环相比,向心循环时VL的MEP幅度更大(26±11.4% M对15.2±7.7% M;P = 0.008),而RF的MEP幅度无差异(24.4±10.8% M对17.2±9.8% M;P = 0.051)。虽然向心循环时VL的EMG高于离心循环(P = 0.03),但RF的EMG无显著差异(P = 0.07)。发现静息期持续时间相似(RF:120±30 ms;VL:114±27 ms;均>0.61),但两种肌肉在离心循环时静息期/MEP比值均高于向心循环(均<0.02)。总之,与向心循环相比,离心循环时对膝伸肌的皮质脊髓兴奋性较低,相对静息期较长,但两者均随时间保持不变。