Dullea Alexandra D, Gonzalez Daniel C, Reddy Rohit, Diaz Parris, Zucker Isaac, Delgado Jessica, Nackeeran Sirpi, Blachmann-Braun Ruben, Jones Logan, Sathe Aditya, Reddy Neha, Martin Laura, Syan Raveen, Ramasamy Ranjith
Urology, University of Miami, Miami, USA.
Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, USA.
Cureus. 2022 Feb 22;14(2):e22502. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22502. eCollection 2022 Feb.
Introduction Although women remain vastly underrepresented in urology, the proportion of female urology residents and practicing urologists has steadily increased over the last four decades. However, it remains critical to evaluate the representation of females in the pipeline when examining trainees and practicing urologists. As it pertains to leadership positions, the gender distribution among the board of directors (BOD) and committee chairs in the American Urological Association (AUA) subspecialties has not been studied to date. Therefore, we plan to analyze the proportion of females among the BOD and committee chairs in different subspecialty societies recognized by the AUA over time. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional observational study, quantitatively comparing the composition of gender in BOD and Committee Chair members belonging to different AUA-recognized subspecialty societies from 2014 to 2020. The websites for each subspecialty society were searched and contacted. Results We evaluated BODs from 10 AUA subspecialty societies and committee chair members from 6 AUA subspecialty societies. From 2014 to 2020, the total proportion of female BOD amongst all AUA sub-specialty societies did not change significantly, with a small increase from 10.6% (n = 29) to 13.5% (n = 36). However, female representation among committee chair members significantly increased from 9.8% (n = 20) to 19.2% (n = 44; p = 0.006), along with the total number of women in urology, from 897 (8.9%) to 1,375 (10.3%). Increases in female representation were seen in the Society for the Study of Male Reproduction (SSMR) from 0% to 9% and in the Indian American Urological Association (IAUA) from 4% to 13%. Of note, there were no elected female board members in the Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) or the Urologic Society for Transplantation and Renal Surgery (USTRS) from 2014 to 2020. Conclusion Females remain a minority in leadership positions at AUA sub-specialty societies despite increased female representation in recent years. Future efforts should promote the advancement of women to positions of leadership to reflect the changing landscape of the urology workforce and surgical specialties.
引言 尽管女性在泌尿外科领域的代表性仍然极低,但在过去四十年中,女性泌尿外科住院医师和执业泌尿外科医生的比例一直在稳步上升。然而,在考察实习医生和执业泌尿外科医生时,评估女性在这一人才培养过程中的代表性仍然至关重要。就领导职位而言,美国泌尿外科学会(AUA)各亚专业董事会(BOD)和委员会主席的性别分布情况迄今尚未得到研究。因此,我们计划分析AUA认可的不同亚专业学会中,董事会和委员会主席中女性所占比例随时间的变化情况。
方法 我们进行了一项横断面观察性研究,定量比较了2014年至2020年期间,属于AUA认可的不同亚专业学会的董事会成员和委员会主席的性别构成。对每个亚专业学会的网站进行了搜索和联系。
结果 我们评估了10个AUA亚专业学会的董事会以及6个AUA亚专业学会的委员会主席成员。从2014年到2020年,所有AUA亚专业学会中女性董事会成员的总体比例没有显著变化,仅略有上升,从10.6%(n = 29)升至13.5%(n = 36)。然而,委员会主席成员中的女性比例从9.8%(n = 20)显著增至19.2%(n = 44;p = 0.006),同时泌尿外科领域的女性总数也从897人(8.9%)增至1375人(10.3%)。男性生殖研究学会(SSMR)的女性代表性从0%增至9%,美印泌尿外科学会(IAUA)的女性代表性从4%增至13%。值得注意的是,2014年至2020年期间,泌尿肿瘤学会(SUO)和移植与肾脏外科泌尿外科学会(USTRS)没有女性当选董事会成员。
结论 尽管近年来女性代表性有所增加,但在AUA亚专业学会的领导职位中,女性仍然是少数。未来应努力推动女性晋升到领导职位,以反映泌尿外科劳动力和外科专业不断变化的格局。