Sunil Kumar Karadi Hari, Garner Malgorzata, Khanduja Vikas
Young Adult Hip Service, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Addenbrooke's - Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2022 Mar 17;28:101830. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2022.101830. eCollection 2022 May.
Articular cartilage defects in the hip joint pose a significant surgical challenge and remain one of the most important determinants of success following arthroscopic intervention of the hip. The aim of this literature review was to report on the best available evidence on the various treatment options utilised for articular cartilage defects in the hip.
A comprehensive literature search was performed on PubMed from its inception to October 2021 using the following search strategy: ((hip) and (cartilage or chondral) and (repair or regeneration or restoration or implantation or chondroplasty or chondrogenic)). Two reviewers (KHSK, MG) independently reviewed titles and abstracts to identify articles for the final analysis. Articles were included if they were original research studies (randomised control trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, or comparative studies) on treatment of hip cartilage defects in humans reporting on a minimum of 5 patients. A total of 1172 articles were identified from the initial literature search. Following a thorough selection process, 35 articles were included in the final analysis to synthesise the evidence.
Debridement, microfracture, autologous chondocyte implanatation (ACI) and matrix-induced ACI (MACI) are shown to have good short-to medium-term results. Injectable ACI and MACI have been developed to enable these procedures to be performed via arthroscopic surgery to reduce the post-operative morbidity associated with surgery with promising early results. Large cartilage defects which involved the sub-chondral bone may need the use of osteochondral grafts either autograft or allograft. Newer biological solutions have been developed to potentially deliver a single-stage procedure for hip cartilage injuries but longer-term results are still awaited.
Accurate identification of the extent of the injury helps stratify the defect and plan appropriate treatment. Several surgical techniques have shown good short to medium-term outcomes with ACI, AMIC, mosaicplasty and microfracture. Recent advances have enabled the use of injectable MACI and bioscaffolds which show promising results but in the shorter term. However, one needs to be mindful of the techniques which can be used in their surgical setting with the available resources. In order to thoroughly evaluate the benefits of the different surgical techniques for hip cartilage defects, large scale prospective multi-centre studies are necessary. Perhaps inclusion of such procedures in registries may also yield meaningful and pragmatic results.
髋关节的关节软骨缺损带来了重大的手术挑战,并且仍然是髋关节关节镜干预术后成功的最重要决定因素之一。这篇文献综述的目的是报告关于用于治疗髋关节关节软骨缺损的各种治疗选择的最佳现有证据。
从PubMed数据库建立至2021年10月,采用以下检索策略进行全面的文献检索:((髋关节)且(软骨或软骨性的)且(修复或再生或恢复或植入或软骨成形术或软骨生成))。两位审阅者(KHSK、MG)独立审阅标题和摘要,以确定纳入最终分析的文章。如果文章是关于人类髋关节软骨缺损治疗的原创研究(随机对照试验、队列研究、病例对照研究或比较研究),且报告的患者至少有5例,则纳入研究。从最初的文献检索中总共识别出1172篇文章。经过全面的筛选过程,35篇文章被纳入最终分析以综合证据。
清创术、微骨折术、自体软骨细胞植入术(ACI)和基质诱导自体软骨细胞植入术(MACI)显示出良好的短期至中期效果。可注射式ACI和MACI已被开发出来,使这些手术能够通过关节镜手术进行,以降低与手术相关的术后发病率,早期结果很有前景。涉及软骨下骨的大软骨缺损可能需要使用自体或异体骨软骨移植。已经开发出更新的生物解决方案,有可能为髋关节软骨损伤提供单阶段手术,但仍在等待长期结果。
准确识别损伤程度有助于对缺损进行分层并规划适当的治疗。几种手术技术在ACI、AMIC、镶嵌植骨术和微骨折术方面显示出良好的短期至中期结果。最近的进展使得可注射MACI和生物支架的使用成为可能,它们在短期内显示出有前景的结果。然而,需要注意在其手术环境中可利用现有资源使用的技术。为了全面评估不同手术技术对髋关节软骨缺损的益处,有必要进行大规模的前瞻性多中心研究。也许将此类手术纳入登记系统也可能产生有意义和实用的结果。