Suppr超能文献

载药微球支气管动脉化疗栓塞联合或不联合微波消融治疗晚期及标准治疗难治/不宜的非小细胞肺癌:一项对比研究

Drug-Eluting Bead Bronchial Arterial Chemoembolization With and Without Microwave Ablation for the Treatment of Advanced and Standard Treatment-Refractory/Ineligible Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Comparative Study.

作者信息

Xu Sheng, Bie Zhi-Xin, Li Yuan-Ming, Li Bin, Kong Fan-Lei, Peng Jin-Zhao, Li Xiao-Guang

机构信息

Department of Minimally Invasive Tumor Therapies Center, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.

Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2022 Mar 15;12:851830. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.851830. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes of drug-eluting bead bronchial arterial chemoembolization (DEB-BACE) with and without microwave ablation (MWA) for the treatment of advanced and standard treatment-refractory/ineligible non-small cell lung cancer (ASTRI-NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 77 ASTRI-NSCLC patients who received DEB-BACE combined with MWA (group A; n = 28) or DEB-BACE alone (group B; n = 49) were included. Clinical outcomes were compared between groups A and B. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to compare the median progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to investigate the predictors of OS for ASTRI-NSCLC treated with DEB-BACE.

RESULTS

No severe adverse event was found in both groups. Pneumothorax was the predominant MWA-related complication in group A, with an incidence rate of 32.1% (9/28). Meanwhile, no significant difference was found in DEB-BACE-related complications between groups A and B. The overall disease control rate (DCR) was 61.0% (47/77), with a significantly higher DCR in group A (85.7% vs. 46.9%, = 0.002). The median PFS in groups A and B was 7.0 and 4.0 months, respectively, with a significant difference ( = 0.037). The median OS in groups A and B was both 8.0 months, with no significant difference ( = 0.318). The 6-month PFS and OS rates in groups A and B were 75.0% and 78.6%, 22.4% and 59.2%, respectively, while the 12-month PFS and OS rates in groups A and B were 17.9% and 28.6%, 14.3% and 22.4%, respectively. Of these, a significantly higher 6-month PFS rate was found in group A (75.0% vs. 22.4%; 0.001). The cycles of DEB-BACE/bronchial artery infusion chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR): 0.363; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.202-0.655; = 0.001] and postoperative immunotherapy (HR: 0.219; 95% CI: 0.085-0.561; = 0.002) were identified as the predictors of OS in ASTRI-NSCLC treated with DEB-BACE.

CONCLUSION

MWA sequentially combined with DEB-BACE was superior to DEB-BACE alone in the local control of ASTRI-NSCLC. Although the combination therapy reveals a trend of prolonging the OS, long-term prognosis warrants an investigation with a longer follow-up.

摘要

目的

比较药物洗脱微球支气管动脉化疗栓塞术(DEB-BACE)联合与不联合微波消融(MWA)治疗晚期及标准治疗难治/不宜的非小细胞肺癌(ASTRI-NSCLC)的疗效。

材料与方法

纳入77例接受DEB-BACE联合MWA(A组;n = 28)或单纯DEB-BACE(B组;n = 49)的ASTRI-NSCLC患者。比较A组和B组的临床疗效。采用Kaplan-Meier法比较两组的中位无进展生存期(PFS)或总生存期(OS)。采用单因素和多因素Cox比例风险分析来研究DEB-BACE治疗ASTRI-NSCLC的OS预测因素。

结果

两组均未发现严重不良事件。气胸是A组主要的与MWA相关的并发症,发生率为32.1%(9/28)。同时,A组和B组在与DEB-BACE相关的并发症方面未发现显著差异。总体疾病控制率(DCR)为61.0%(47/77),A组的DCR显著更高(85.7%对46.9%,P = 0.002)。A组和B组的中位PFS分别为7.0个月和4.0个月,差异有统计学意义(P = 0.037)。A组和B组的中位OS均为8.0个月,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.318)。A组和B组的6个月PFS率和OS率分别为75.0%和78.6%、22.4%和59.2%,而A组和B组的12个月PFS率和OS率分别为17.9%和28.6%、14.3%和

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6707/8965054/81d6d4e25e19/fonc-12-851830-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验