Department of Vascular Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Taian 271000, China.
Medical Laboratory, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Taian 271000, China.
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Mar 24;2022:4846279. doi: 10.1155/2022/4846279. eCollection 2022.
In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) and peripheral intravenous thrombolysis (PIT) in the treatment of patients with acute pulmonary embolism (APE) and assess its effect on the prognosis of patients.
We recruited 74 patients with APE, who were assigned to CDT and PIT groups, according to the treatments received by them. The arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO), partial pressure of carbon dioxide (Pa CO), pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), pulmonary artery obstruction index (PAOI), thrombus volume, pain score, and therapeutic benefits were compared between the two groups before and after treatment, and the factors affecting patient prognoses were also analyzed.
Using the clinical data before treatment as the baseline, it was found that changes in indicators of plasma, thrombus volume, and pain scores were significantly better in the CDT group than in the PIT group after treatment. The total effective rate of CDT was higher than that of PIT in the treatment of APE. The mean follow-up time for both the CDT and PIT groups was 41.08 ± 9.12 months, and the total mortality rate was 14.8% and 31%, respectively. The logistic regression analysis revealed the significant impacts of previous incidences of pulmonary embolism (PE), concurrent deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) on the occurrence and progression of APE, and these factors were subsequently identified as risk factors for APE using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Observations from PAE onset to the end of follow-up revealed that there was a difference in survival rates between the CDT and PIT groups.
Taken together, CDT is an effective treatment strategy for APE and can provide effective symptomatic relief. In addition, the previous incidences of PE, concurrent DVT, and PAH are important risk factors that affect the survival rates of patients with APE.
本研究旨在探讨导管溶栓(CDT)和外周静脉溶栓(PIT)治疗急性肺栓塞(APE)的疗效,并评估其对患者预后的影响。
我们招募了 74 名 APE 患者,根据治疗方法将其分为 CDT 组和 PIT 组。比较两组患者治疗前后动脉血氧分压(PaO)、二氧化碳分压(PaCO)、肺动脉压(PAP)、肺动脉阻塞指数(PAOI)、血栓体积、疼痛评分和治疗效果,分析影响患者预后的因素。
以治疗前的临床资料为基线,发现治疗后 CDT 组血浆指标、血栓体积和疼痛评分的变化明显优于 PIT 组。CDT 治疗 APE 的总有效率高于 PIT。CDT 组和 PIT 组的平均随访时间分别为 41.08±9.12 个月和 41.08±9.12 个月,总死亡率分别为 14.8%和 31%。Logistic 回归分析显示,既往肺栓塞(PE)、深静脉血栓形成(DVT)和肺动脉高压(PAH)的发生对 APE 的发生和进展有显著影响,Kaplan-Meier 生存分析将这些因素确定为 APE 的危险因素。PAE 发病至随访结束的观察结果显示,CDT 组和 PIT 组的生存率存在差异。
综上所述,CDT 是治疗 APE 的有效策略,可提供有效的症状缓解。此外,既往 PE、并发 DVT 和 PAH 是影响 APE 患者生存率的重要危险因素。