Department of Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Hospital for Psychiatry, Werneck, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry, Masaryk University and University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2022 Nov;26(4):406-416. doi: 10.1080/13651501.2022.2054350. Epub 2022 Apr 2.
To discuss the impact of depression on work and how depression-related sick leave duration could be a potential indicator and outcome for measuring functionality in depression. Our review was based on a literature search and expert opinion that emerged during a virtual meeting of European psychiatrists that was convened to discuss this topic. Current evidence demonstrates that depression-related sick leave duration is influenced by multiple disease-, patient- and work-related factors, together with societal attitudes towards depression and socioeconomic conditions. A wide variety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments and work-based interventions are effective in reducing depression-related sick leave duration and/or facilitating return to work. Recent real-world evidence showed that patients treated with antidepressant monotherapy appear to recover their working life faster than those receiving combination therapy. Although depression-related sick leave duration was found to correlate with severity of depressive symptoms, it cannot be used alone as a viable marker for disease severity. Given its multifactorial nature, depression-related sick leave duration is not on its own a viable outcome measure of depression severity but could be used as a secondary outcome alongside more formal severity measures and may also represent a useful measure of functionality in depression. Key pointsDepression in the working population and depression-related sick leave have a profound economic impact on societyDepression-related sick leave duration is influenced by multiple disease-, patient- and work-related factors, together with societal attitudes towards depression and socioeconomic conditionsA wide variety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments and work-based interventions have been shown to be effective in reducing depression-related sick leave duration and/or facilitating return to workIn terms of pharmacological intervention, recent real-world evidence has shown that patients treated with antidepressant monotherapy are able to recover their working life faster than those treated with combination therapyAlthough depression-related sick leave duration has been shown to correlate with severity of depressive symptoms, it is not a viable outcome measure of depression severity on its own, but could be used as secondary outcome alongside more formal clinician- and patient-rated severity measuresDepression-related sick leave duration may, however, represent a viable outcome for measuring functionality in depression.
探讨抑郁对工作的影响,以及与抑郁相关的病假持续时间如何成为衡量抑郁功能的潜在指标和结果。我们的综述基于文献检索和专家意见,这些意见是在一次讨论该主题的欧洲精神病学家虚拟会议上提出的。现有证据表明,与抑郁相关的病假持续时间受到多种疾病、患者和工作相关因素的影响,同时还受到社会对抑郁的态度和社会经济状况的影响。各种药物和非药物治疗以及基于工作的干预措施都能有效减少与抑郁相关的病假持续时间和/或促进重返工作岗位。最近的真实世界证据表明,接受抗抑郁单药治疗的患者似乎比接受联合治疗的患者更快地恢复工作生活。虽然与抑郁相关的病假持续时间与抑郁症状的严重程度相关,但不能单独作为疾病严重程度的可行标志物。鉴于其多因素性质,与抑郁相关的病假持续时间本身并不是衡量抑郁严重程度的可行结果指标,但可以与更正式的严重程度指标一起作为次要结果使用,也可能是衡量抑郁功能的有用指标。要点工作人群中的抑郁和与抑郁相关的病假对社会造成了深远的经济影响与抑郁相关的病假持续时间受到多种疾病、患者和工作相关因素的影响,同时还受到社会对抑郁的态度和社会经济状况的影响各种药物和非药物治疗以及基于工作的干预措施已被证明能有效减少与抑郁相关的病假持续时间和/或促进重返工作岗位在药物干预方面,最近的真实世界证据表明,接受抗抑郁单药治疗的患者比接受联合治疗的患者更快地恢复工作生活虽然与抑郁相关的病假持续时间与抑郁症状的严重程度相关,但它本身并不是衡量抑郁严重程度的可行结果指标,但可以与更正式的临床医生和患者评估的严重程度指标一起作为次要结果使用与抑郁相关的病假持续时间可能是衡量抑郁功能的一个可行结果。