Hetlevik Øystein, Ruths Sabine, Grung Ina, Nilsen Stein, Bringedal Berit
Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen,, Årstadveien 17, Bergen, 5018, Norway.
Research Unit for General Practice, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 5;24(1):1550. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11974-1.
Depression is among the most frequent reasons for sick leave, whereas health authorities recommend a rather strict practice, arguing that work is health-promoting. We aimed to explore GPs' attitudes and practices regarding sick leave certification for depressed patients.
A cross-sectional study using the Norwegian Physician Survey (N = 1617, 70% response rate) in 2021. The GPs in the panel (N = 221) responded to questions about sick leave certification and cooperation with employers and the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration (Norwegian acronym: Nav) regarding patients with depression. We used crosstabulation with chi square statistics and logistic regression models to assess differences among GPs.
Among 221 GPs, 62% often/very often perceived patients' questions for sick leave certification as the main reason for encountering. A total of 46% often/very often considered patients' expectations inappropriate, with female GPs more frequently than male GPs (36% vs 56%, p = 0.005) and younger GPs more frequently than their older counterparts (p < 0.001). Although 68% considered sick leave as part of treatment, only 16% often/very often initiated sick leave unless patients raised the question. Sixty-seven percent of GPs reported to often/very often avoid sick listing, if possible, more females than males. GPs who often/very often considered questions for sick leave inappropriate less often considered sick leave as part of treatment (odds ratio (OR): 0.25; 95% CI: 0.13-0.49), and less often report a well-functioning cooperation with Nav (OR:0.37; 95% CI:0.14-0.96). GPs who often/very often considered sick leave as part of treatment more often proposed sick leave for their patients (OR:4.70; 96% CI 1.57-14.01) and reported a less strict approach to sick listing (OR: 40; 95% CI: 0.20-0.79). Ninety-five percent of the GPs rarely/never had direct contact with patients' employers, whereas 92% often/very often asked patients about their dialogue with the workplace. Eighty-eight percent of the GPs often/very often experienced cooperation with NAV as good, and 87% often/very often felt trusted by them.
Most GPs reported a strict attitude towards sick leave for depression, whereas one-third had a less strict approach. Different perceptions of the appropriateness of sick listing indicate variations in treatment and access to social security benefits.
抑郁症是病假最常见的原因之一,而卫生当局建议采取相当严格的做法,认为工作对健康有益。我们旨在探讨全科医生对抑郁症患者病假证明的态度和做法。
2021年使用挪威医生调查进行的一项横断面研究(N = 1617,应答率70%)。参与调查的全科医生(N = 221)回答了关于病假证明以及与雇主和挪威劳动与福利管理局(挪威语缩写:Nav)就抑郁症患者进行合作的问题。我们使用卡方统计的交叉表和逻辑回归模型来评估全科医生之间的差异。
在221名全科医生中,62%经常/非常经常将患者关于病假证明的问题视为遇到的主要原因。共有46%经常/非常经常认为患者的期望不合适,女性全科医生比男性全科医生更频繁(36%对56%,p = 0.005),年轻全科医生比年长的同行更频繁(p < 0.001)。尽管68%认为病假是治疗的一部分,但只有16%经常/非常经常主动开具病假证明,除非患者提出问题。67%的全科医生报告说,如果可能,经常/非常经常避免开具病假证明,女性比男性更多。经常/非常经常认为病假问题不合适的全科医生较少将病假视为治疗的一部分(优势比(OR):0.25;95%置信区间:0.13 - 0.49),并且较少报告与Nav有良好的合作(OR:0.37;95%置信区间:0.14 - 0.96)。经常/非常经常将病假视为治疗一部分的全科医生更经常为患者提议病假(OR:4.70;96%置信区间1.57 - 14.01),并且报告对开具病假的态度不那么严格(OR:40;95%置信区间:0.20 - 0.79)。95%的全科医生很少/从未与患者的雇主直接接触,而92%经常/非常经常询问患者与工作场所的对话情况。88%的全科医生经常/非常经常认为与Nav的合作良好,87%经常/非常经常感到被他们信任。
大多数全科医生报告对抑郁症病假持严格态度,而三分之一的态度不那么严格。对开具病假适宜性的不同看法表明在治疗和获得社会保障福利方面存在差异。