Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Orthopaedic and Rheumatology Institute, 9500 Euclid Avenue, A41, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 May;33(4):1057-1066. doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03248-5. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
To investigate (1) healthcare utilization, (2) in-hospital metrics and (3) total in-hospital costs associated with simultaneous versus staged BTKA while evaluating staged BTKA as a single process consisting of two combined episodes.
The national readmissions database was reviewed for simultaneous and staged (two primary unilateral TKAs12 months apart) BTKA patients (2016-2017). A total of 19,382 simultaneous BTKAs were identified, and propensity score matched (1:1) to staged BTKA patients (19,382 patients; 38,764 surgeries) based on demographics, comorbidities, and socioeconomic determinants. Outcomes included healthcare utilization [length of stay (LOS) and discharge disposition], in-hospital periprosthetic fractures, non-mechanical complications, and costs. Staged BTKA was evaluated as one process consisting of two episodes. For each staged patient, continuous outcomes were evaluated via the sum of both episodes. Categorical outcomes were added, and percents were expressed relative to total number of surgeries (n = 38,764).
Simultaneous BTKA had longer LOS (5.0 days ± 4.7 vs. 4.5 days ± 3.5; p < 0.001), higher non-home discharge [36.9% (n = 7150/19,382) vs. 13.6% (n = 5451/38,764)], in-hospital periprosthetic fractures [0.13% (26/19,382) vs. 0.08% (31/38,764); p = 0.049], any non-mechanical complication [33.76% (6543/19,382) vs.15.93% (6177/38,764); p < 0.0001], hematoma/seroma formation [0.11% (22/19,382) vs. 0.05% (20/38,764); p = 0.0088], wound disruption [0.08% (16/19,382) vs. 0.04% (16/38,764); p = 0.0454], and any infection [1.13% (219/19,382) vs. 0.50% (194/38,764); p < 0.0001]. Average in-hospital costs for the two staged BTKA episodes combined were $5006 higher than those of simultaneous BTKA ($28,196 ± $18,488 vs. $33,202 ± $15,240; p < 0.001).
Simultaneous BTKA had higher healthcare utilization and in-hospital complications than both episodes of staged BTKA combined, with a minimal in-hospital cost savings. Future studies are warranted to further explore patient selection who would benefit from BTKA.
研究同时与分期行 BTKA(双侧全膝关节置换术)相关的(1)医疗保健利用情况、(2)住院指标和(3)总住院费用,并将分期 BTKA 评估为由两个联合手术组成的单一过程。
对同时性和分期性(12 个月内两次单侧初次 BTKA)BTKA 患者的全国再入院数据库进行了回顾性分析。共确定了 19382 例同时性 BTKA,并根据人口统计学、合并症和社会经济决定因素,采用倾向评分匹配(1:1)将其与分期性 BTKA 患者(19382 例患者;38764 例手术)进行匹配。结果包括医疗保健利用情况[住院时间(LOS)和出院去向]、围手术期假体周围骨折、非机械并发症和费用。分期 BTKA 被评估为由两个手术组成的单一过程。对于每个分期患者,通过两个手术的总和来评估连续结果。对分类结果进行了加总,并以手术总数(n=38764)为基数计算了百分比。
与分期 BTKA 相比,同时性 BTKA 的 LOS 更长(5.0 天±4.7 比 4.5 天±3.5;p<0.001),非家庭出院率更高(36.9%(n=7150/19382)比 13.6%(n=5451/38764)),围手术期假体周围骨折发生率更高(0.13%(26/19382)比 0.08%(31/38764);p=0.049),任何非机械并发症发生率更高(33.76%(6543/19382)比 15.93%(6177/38764);p<0.0001),血肿/血清肿形成发生率更高(0.11%(22/19382)比 0.05%(20/38764);p=0.0088),伤口破裂发生率更高(0.08%(16/19382)比 0.04%(16/38764);p=0.0454),任何感染发生率更高(1.13%(219/19382)比 0.50%(194/38764);p<0.0001)。两个分期 BTKA 手术联合的住院期间平均费用比同时性 BTKA 高 5006 美元(28196±18488 比 33202±15240;p<0.001)。
与分期 BTKA 两次手术的总和相比,同时性 BTKA 的医疗保健利用和住院并发症更高,但住院费用略有节省。未来需要进一步研究哪些患者将从 BTKA 中受益,以进行更深入的探索。