Bentvelsen Robbert G, Bruijning Marguerite L, Chavannes Niels H, Veldkamp Karin Ellen
Department of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.
Microvida Laboratory for Medical Microbiology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands.
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Apr 4;6(4):e28983. doi: 10.2196/28983.
The risk of urinary tract infections is increased by the inappropriate placement and unnecessary prolongation of the use of indwelling urinary catheters. Sustained behavior change in infection prevention could be promoted by empowering patients through a smartphone app.
The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and efficacy of implementation actions on patients' use of the Participatient app on a clinical ward and to compare 3 survey methods for urinary catheter use.
Participatient was introduced for all admitted patients at the surgical nursing ward in a university hospital in the Netherlands. Over a period of 3 months, the number of new app users, days of use, and sessions were recorded. In a comparison of urinary catheter use before and after the implementation of the app, 3 methods for point prevalence surveys of catheter use were tested. Surveys were conducted through manual parsing of the text in patients' electronic medical records, parsing a survey of checkbox items, and parsing nursing notes.
In all, 475 patients were admitted to the ward, 42 (8.8%) installed the app, with 1 to 5 new users per week. The actions with the most ensuing app use were the kick-off with the clinical lesson and recruiting of the intake nurse. Between the survey methods, there was considerable variation in catheter use prevalence. Therefore, we used the standard method of manual parsing in further analyses. Catheter use prevalence decreased from 38% (36/96) to 27% (23/86) after app introduction (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.32-1.14).
The clinical application of Participatient, the infection prevention app for patients, could be feasible when implementation actions are also used. For surveying indwelling urinary catheter use prevalence, manual parsing is the best approach.
留置导尿管放置不当和使用时间不必要的延长会增加尿路感染的风险。通过智能手机应用程序增强患者能力,可促进预防感染方面持续的行为改变。
本研究旨在评估在临床病房实施相关措施促使患者使用Participatient应用程序的可行性和有效性,并比较3种导尿管使用情况的调查方法。
在荷兰一家大学医院的外科护理病房,为所有入院患者引入了Participatient应用程序。在3个月的时间里,记录新应用程序用户数量、使用天数和会话次数。在比较应用程序实施前后导尿管的使用情况时,测试了3种导尿管使用情况的现患率调查方法。调查通过人工解析患者电子病历中的文本、解析复选框项目调查以及解析护理记录来进行。
该病房共收治475例患者,42例(8.8%)安装了该应用程序,每周有1至5名新用户。引发应用程序使用最多的行动是开展临床课程和招募入院护士。在调查方法之间,导尿管使用现患率存在相当大的差异。因此,我们在进一步分析中使用了人工解析的标准方法。应用程序引入后,导尿管使用现患率从38%(36/96)降至27%(23/86)(比值比0.61,95%置信区间0.32 - 1.14)。
当同时采取实施措施时,患者感染预防应用程序Participatient的临床应用可能是可行的。对于调查留置导尿管的使用现患率,人工解析是最佳方法。