• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超时:预测每日幻想体育的自我排除。

Time out: Prediction of self-exclusion from daily fantasy sports.

机构信息

Division on Addiction.

出版信息

Psychol Addict Behav. 2022 Jun;36(4):318-332. doi: 10.1037/adb0000829. Epub 2022 Apr 4.

DOI:10.1037/adb0000829
PMID:35377675
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Responsible gambling (RG) tools that include play management software, self-limit features, and self-exclusion are relatively common offerings on major online gambling platforms. However, how online gaming and daily fantasy sports (DFS) players use such tools is less clear. The goals of this article were to understand how players use self-exclusion at a major DFS platform and to identify DFS activity-related predictors of self-exclusion.

METHOD

During November 2015, DraftKings, a major DFS provider, rolled out a self-exclusion feature that allows players to self-exclude from the platform for a specified amount of time, up to 5 years. We used player records from DraftKings, examining play patterns and self-exclusion across 3 + years of data.

RESULTS

We found that less than 0.5% of subscribers in our sample self-excluded during the study period and almost one third of those who self-excluded did so more than once. In general, self-excluders engaged with a greater variety of contests and sports and entered contests with higher entry fees than those who did not self-exclude. Repeat self-excluders selected shorter initial self-exclusion terms and also engaged with a greater variety of game types and sports than one-time self-excluders. However, self-excluders did not engage in riskier contests or experience higher percent losses.

CONCLUSION

Our findings have implications for our understanding of RG feature use among DFS subscribers and markers of risk for experiencing problems with DFS and gambling more generally. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

目的

负责任博彩(RG)工具,包括游戏管理软件、自我限制功能和自我排除,在主要在线博彩平台上较为常见。然而,在线游戏和日常幻想体育(DFS)玩家如何使用这些工具还不太清楚。本文的目的是了解玩家如何在一个主要的 DFS 平台上使用自我排除,并确定与 DFS 活动相关的自我排除的预测因素。

方法

2015 年 11 月,主要的 DFS 提供商 DraftKings 推出了自我排除功能,允许玩家在指定的时间内(最长 5 年)自我排除该平台。我们使用 DraftKings 的玩家记录,在 3 年多的数据中检查游戏模式和自我排除情况。

结果

我们发现,在我们的样本中,不到 0.5%的用户在研究期间自我排除,而且近三分之一的自我排除者不止一次自我排除。一般来说,自我排除者参与了更多种类的比赛和运动,并且参与的比赛入场费也高于那些没有自我排除的人。重复自我排除者选择的初始自我排除期限较短,并且比一次性自我排除者更多地参与了不同类型的游戏和运动。然而,自我排除者并没有参与风险更高的比赛,也没有经历更高的百分比损失。

结论

我们的发现对我们理解 DFS 用户对 RG 功能的使用以及 DFS 和更广泛的赌博问题的风险标志具有启示意义。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Time out: Prediction of self-exclusion from daily fantasy sports.超时:预测每日幻想体育的自我排除。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2022 Jun;36(4):318-332. doi: 10.1037/adb0000829. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
2
Patterns of Daily Fantasy Sport Play: Tackling the Issues.日常梦幻体育游戏模式:解决问题。
J Gambl Stud. 2019 Mar;35(1):181-204. doi: 10.1007/s10899-018-09817-w.
3
A large-scale prospective study of big wins and their relationship with future financial and time involvement in actual daily fantasy sports contests.一项关于大赢家及其与未来实际每日梦幻体育比赛中财务和时间投入关系的大规模前瞻性研究。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2021 Dec;35(8):948-960. doi: 10.1037/adb0000715. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
4
Understanding the Relation Between Social Behaviors and Daily Fantasy Sports Risk Behavior.理解社交行为与日常梦幻体育风险行为之间的关系。
J Gambl Stud. 2020 Sep;36(3):921-935. doi: 10.1007/s10899-019-09911-7.
5
Daily Fantasy Sports Players: Gambling, Addiction, and Mental Health Problems.每日幻想体育玩家:赌博、成瘾和心理健康问题。
J Gambl Stud. 2018 Sep;34(3):727-737. doi: 10.1007/s10899-018-9744-4.
6
Evidence of Skill and Strategy in Daily Fantasy Basketball.日常梦幻篮球中的技巧和策略证据。
J Gambl Stud. 2018 Sep;34(3):757-771. doi: 10.1007/s10899-018-9766-y.
7
A descriptive analysis of demographic and behavioral data from Internet gamblers and those who self-exclude from online gambling platforms.对网络赌博者以及那些自行排除在在线赌博平台之外的人群的人口统计学和行为数据进行描述性分析。
J Gambl Stud. 2015 Mar;31(1):105-32. doi: 10.1007/s10899-013-9418-1.
8
Casino Self- and Forced Excluders' Gambling Behavior Before and After Exclusion.赌场自我和强制禁入者在禁入前后的赌博行为。
J Gambl Stud. 2018 Jun;34(2):597-615. doi: 10.1007/s10899-017-9732-0.
9
Daily Fantasy Football and Self-Reported Problem Behavior in the United States.美国的日常梦幻足球与自我报告的问题行为。
J Gambl Stud. 2018 Sep;34(3):689-707. doi: 10.1007/s10899-017-9720-4.
10
Self-exclusion and breaching of self-exclusion from gambling: a repeated survey study on the development of a nationwide self-exclusion service.自我排除和违反自我排除赌博:全国性自我排除服务发展的重复调查研究。
Harm Reduct J. 2023 Aug 8;20(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12954-023-00822-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Cryptocurrency Trading, Day Trading, and Gambling Behavior: Examining the Moderating Effects of Financially Focused Self-Concept and Gambling Motives.加密货币交易、日内交易与赌博行为:探究以财务为导向的自我概念和赌博动机的调节作用。
J Gambl Stud. 2025 Mar;41(1):67-89. doi: 10.1007/s10899-024-10343-1. Epub 2024 Aug 17.
2
Overtime: Long-Term Betting Trajectories Among Highly-Involved and Less-Involved Online Sports Bettors.加班:高参与度和低参与度在线体育投注者的长期投注轨迹
J Gambl Stud. 2024 Sep;40(3):1245-1270. doi: 10.1007/s10899-024-10294-7. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
3
Microbetting, Fantasy Sports and Risk of Gambling Disorder: A Scoping Review.
微投注、幻想体育与赌博障碍风险:范围综述。
J Gambl Stud. 2024 Jun;40(2):587-600. doi: 10.1007/s10899-023-10239-6. Epub 2023 Jul 15.