• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类儿童能感知“数量多即更多”错觉,而恒河猴则不能。

Children (Homo sapiens), but not rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), perceive the one-is-more illusion.

作者信息

McKeon Emma J, Beran Michael J, Parrish Audrey E

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

J Comp Psychol. 2022 Nov;136(4):270-278. doi: 10.1037/com0000316. Epub 2022 Apr 4.

DOI:10.1037/com0000316
PMID:35377679
Abstract

Visual illusions are of particular interest to cognitive researchers because they reflect the active role of the brain in processing the world around us. Yousif and Scholl (2019) recently described a new visual experience, the one-is-more illusion, in which adult humans perceived continuous objects as longer than sets of discrete objects of equal length. In the current study, we investigated this phenomenon in human children ( ) and rhesus macaques (). Children were presented with a computerized 2-choice discrimination task and successfully selected the longer of 2 images for control trials. On trials in which 2 versions of the same image were presented (identical in length), and one was of a continuous form and the other consisted of 2 or more distinct units, children showed a bias for the continuous object. Monkeys were given the same computerized task and learned to choose the longer of 2 otherwise identical stimuli. However, monkeys did not show a bias to choose the continuous probe images as longer than the discrete images in the critical test trials with equal-length stimuli. These results are discussed in light of developmental and comparative research on related illusory experiences and perceptual mechanisms. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

视觉错觉尤其引起认知研究人员的兴趣,因为它们反映了大脑在处理我们周围世界时所发挥的积极作用。尤西夫和肖尔(2019年)最近描述了一种新的视觉体验,即“一即多”错觉,在这种错觉中,成年人会将连续的物体感知为比长度相等的离散物体组更长。在当前的研究中,我们在人类儿童( )和恒河猴( )身上研究了这一现象。儿童接受了一项计算机化的二选一辨别任务,并在对照试验中成功地选择了两张图片中较长的那张。在呈现同一图像的两个版本(长度相同)的试验中,一个是连续形式,另一个由两个或更多不同单元组成,儿童表现出对连续物体的偏好。猴子接受了相同的计算机化任务,并学会选择两个其他方面相同的刺激中较长的那个。然而,在长度相等的刺激的关键测试试验中,猴子并没有表现出选择连续探测图像比离散图像更长的偏好。我们根据对相关错觉体验和感知机制的发展和比较研究来讨论这些结果。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2022美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

1
Children (Homo sapiens), but not rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), perceive the one-is-more illusion.人类儿童能感知“数量多即更多”错觉,而恒河猴则不能。
J Comp Psychol. 2022 Nov;136(4):270-278. doi: 10.1037/com0000316. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
2
Exploring the Jastrow Illusion in Humans ( Homo sapiens), Rhesus Monkeys ( Macaca mulatta), and Capuchin Monkeys ( Sapajus apella).探索人类(智人)、恒河猴(猕猴)和卷尾猴(白喉卷尾猴)中的贾斯特罗错觉。
Perception. 2019 May;48(5):367-385. doi: 10.1177/0301006619838181. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
3
Linear numerosity illusions in capuchin monkeys (Sapajus apella), rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta), and humans (Homo sapiens).卷尾猴(僧面猴属)、恒河猴(猕猴属)和人类(智人)中的线性数量错觉。
Anim Cogn. 2019 Sep;22(5):883-895. doi: 10.1007/s10071-019-01288-9. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
4
Assessing the perception of face pareidolia in children (Homo sapiens), rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), and capuchin monkeys (Sapajus apella).评估儿童(智人)、恒河猴(猕猴)和卷尾猴(白脸卷尾猴)对面部幻觉的感知。
J Comp Psychol. 2023 May;137(2):90-101. doi: 10.1037/com0000320. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
5
Do you see what I see? A comparative investigation of the Delboeuf illusion in humans (Homo sapiens), rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).你看到我所看到的了吗?一项关于人类(智人)、恒河猴(猕猴)和卷尾猴(僧帽猴)中德勃夫错觉的对比研究。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2015 Oct;41(4):395-405. doi: 10.1037/xan0000078. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
6
Do primates see the solitaire illusion differently? A comparative assessment of humans (Homo sapiens), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).灵长类动物对单人纸牌幻觉的看法是否不同?对人类(智人)、黑猩猩(黑猩猩)、恒河猴(猕猴)和卷尾猴(卷尾猴)的比较评估。
J Comp Psychol. 2014 Nov;128(4):402-13. doi: 10.1037/a0037499. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
7
The elusive illusion: Do children (Homo sapiens) and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) see the Solitaire illusion?难以捉摸的错觉:儿童(智人)和卷尾猴(僧帽猴)能看到纸牌错觉吗?
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Feb;142:83-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.09.021. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
8
Do rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) perceive illusory motion?恒河猴(猕猴)能感知到虚幻运动吗?
Anim Cogn. 2015 Jul;18(4):895-910. doi: 10.1007/s10071-015-0860-6. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
9
Exploring whether nonhuman primates show a bias to overestimate dense quantities.探索非人类灵长类动物是否表现出高估密集数量的倾向。
J Comp Psychol. 2017 Feb;131(1):59-68. doi: 10.1037/com0000058.
10
Limited evidence of number-space mapping in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and capuchin monkeys (Sapajus apella).恒河猴(猕猴属)和卷尾猴(僧面猴属)中数字-空间映射的证据有限。
J Comp Psychol. 2019 Aug;133(3):281-293. doi: 10.1037/com0000177. Epub 2019 Mar 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Consistently Inconsistent Perceptual Illusions in Nonhuman Primates: The Importance of Individual Differences.非人灵长类动物中持续存在的不一致性感知错觉:个体差异的重要性。
Animals (Basel). 2022 Dec 21;13(1):22. doi: 10.3390/ani13010022.