Flickinger L, D'Ablaing G, Mishell D R
Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Dec;68(6):855-8.
Uterine size was estimated in 66 women before hysterectomy by bimanual examination, uterine sounding, and pelvic ultrasound. The results were compared with weight and dimensions recorded after removal. There was greater error in estimation of uterine size using bimanual examination (standard error of the estimate [SEE] = 2.6 weeks) or uterine sounding (SEE = 2.2 weeks) than with ultrasound (SEE = 1.06 weeks). A close correlation existed between uterine size and weight (r = 0.95).
在66名女性进行子宫切除术前,通过双合诊检查、子宫探察和盆腔超声估计子宫大小。将结果与切除后记录的重量和尺寸进行比较。与超声检查(估计标准误差[SEE]=1.06周)相比,使用双合诊检查(估计标准误差[SEE]=2.6周)或子宫探察(SEE=2.2周)估计子宫大小的误差更大。子宫大小与重量之间存在密切相关性(r=0.95)。