From Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (BBG, MLA, KE, LDH, CH, DJ, and JBM); Washington Permanente Medical Group (BBG); Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington Department of Medicine (YNH); Health Partners Institute (KLM); Kaiser Permanente Bernard J Tyson School of Medicine (JBM); University of Washington, Department of Human Centered Design and Engineering (SAM); University of Washington, Department of Family Medicine (MJT).
J Am Board Fam Med. 2022 Mar-Apr;35(2):310-319. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.02.210318.
The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends out-of-office blood pressure (BP) measurement before making a new hypertension diagnosis and initiating treatment, using 24-hour ambulatory (ABPM) or home BP monitoring. However, this approach is not common.
e-mail-linked surveys were sent to primary care team members (n = 421) from 10 clinics. The sample included medical assistants, licensed practical nurses, registered nurses, and advanced practice registered nurses (LPN/RN/APRNs), physician assistants (PAs), and physicians. Those licensed to diagnosis hypertension (physician/PA/APRNs) received additional questions. Data were collected from November 2017 to July 2019.
2-thirds of invitees responded (163 MA/LPN/RNs, 86 physicians, and 33 PA/APRNs). When making a new hypertension diagnosis, most respondents believed that BP measured manually with a stethoscope (78.6%) or ABPM (84.2%) were very or highly accurate. In contrast, most did not believe that automated clinic BPs, home BP, or kiosk BP measurements were very or highly accurate. Almost all reported always or almost always relying on clinic BP measurements in making a diagnosis (95.7%), but most physician/PA/APRNs (60.5%) would prefer ABPM if it was readily available. Very few physician/PA/APRNs used the guideline-concordant diagnostic threshold (135/85 mmHg) with home monitoring (14.0%) or ABPM (8.4%), with 140/90 mmHg the most commonly reported threshold for home (59.4%) and ABPM (49.6%).
Our study found health care professional knowledge, beliefs, and practices gaps in diagnosing hypertension. These gaps could lead to clinical care that is not aligned with guidelines.
System changes and interventions to increase use of evidence-based practices could improve hypertension diagnosis and outcomes.
美国预防服务工作组建议在做出新的高血压诊断并开始治疗之前,在办公室外进行血压(BP)测量,使用 24 小时动态(ABPM)或家庭 BP 监测。然而,这种方法并不常见。
从 10 家诊所向初级保健团队成员(n=421)发送了电子邮件链接调查。样本包括医疗助理、持照实用护士、注册护士和高级执业注册护士(LPN/RN/APRNs)、医师助理(PAs)和医生。那些有资格诊断高血压的人(医生/PA/APRNs)收到了额外的问题。数据收集于 2017 年 11 月至 2019 年 7 月。
2/3 的受邀者做出了回应(163 名 MA/LPN/RN、86 名医生和 33 名 PA/APRN)。在做出新的高血压诊断时,大多数受访者认为用听诊器手动测量的 BP(78.6%)或 ABPM(84.2%)非常或高度准确。相比之下,大多数人并不认为自动诊所 BP、家庭 BP 或信息亭 BP 测量非常或高度准确。几乎所有人都报告说,在做出诊断时总是或几乎总是依赖诊所 BP 测量(95.7%),但如果 ABPM 易于获得,大多数医生/PA/APRN(60.5%)更愿意使用 ABPM。很少有医生/PA/APRN 使用家庭监测(14.0%)或 ABPM(8.4%)的指南一致的诊断阈值(135/85mmHg),家庭监测(59.4%)和 ABPM(49.6%)最常用的阈值为 140/90mmHg。
我们的研究发现,在诊断高血压方面,医疗保健专业人员的知识、信念和实践存在差距。这些差距可能导致临床护理不符合指南。
系统改变和干预措施以增加循证实践的使用可以改善高血压的诊断和结果。