Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Systems Biomedicine and Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Center for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022 May 29;77(6):1725-1732. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkac095.
Cefotaxime is frequently used in critically ill children, however pharmacokinetic (PK) studies to support adequate dosing in this patient population are limited.
To characterize cefotaxime PK in critically ill children and evaluate exposures achieved by current and alternative dosing regimens.
Children (0-18 years) admitted to the paediatric ICU, receiving intravenous cefotaxime (100-150 mg/kg/day, interval 6-8 h) were included (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03248349). Total plasma cefotaxime concentrations were measured on multiple study days. Population-PK analysis was performed using nonlinear mixed effects modelling (NONMEM™). Dose evaluations were performed using typical patients across the paediatric age range and target attainment was determined for MICs of 0.5, 2 and 4 mg/L.
479 cefotaxime plasma concentrations from 52 children (median age 1.6, range 0.03-17.7 years) were used to describe cefotaxime PK. We describe a two-compartment structural model with interindividual variability, including bodyweight as covariate for volume of distribution and clearance. Model predicted exposure for 150 mg/kg/day (current dose) showed trough concentrations <0.5 mg/L in patients >4 years of age. The maximum cefotaxime doses (200 mg/kg/day, interval 6 h) proved adequate for MICs ≤0.5 mg/L across the whole age range. Similar daily doses with increased frequency (interval 4 h) covered MICs up to 2 mg/L, while a loading dose followed by continuous infusion regimens are needed to adequately treat MICs of 4 mg/L.
Higher cefotaxime doses are required for adequate exposure for most pathogens in critically ill children. A higher dose frequency or continuous infusion is advisable to improve target attainment for intermediately susceptible pathogens.
头孢噻肟在重症患儿中经常使用,但支持该患者人群中充分剂量的药代动力学(PK)研究有限。
描述重症患儿头孢噻肟的 PK,并评估目前和替代剂量方案所达到的暴露量。
纳入接受静脉内头孢噻肟(100-150mg/kg/天,间隔 6-8 小时)治疗的儿科重症监护病房(PICU)患儿(0-18 岁)(Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03248349)。在多个研究日测量了头孢噻肟的总血浆浓度。使用非线性混合效应模型(NONMEMTM)进行群体 PK 分析。使用儿科年龄范围内的典型患者进行剂量评估,并确定 MIC 值为 0.5、2 和 4mg/L 的目标达成情况。
52 例患儿(中位年龄 1.6 岁,范围 0.03-17.7 岁)的 479 个头孢噻肟血药浓度用于描述头孢噻肟 PK。我们描述了一个具有个体间变异性的两室结构模型,包括体重作为分布容积和清除率的协变量。150mg/kg/天(当前剂量)的模型预测暴露量显示,年龄>4 岁的患者的谷浓度<0.5mg/L。最大头孢噻肟剂量(200mg/kg/天,间隔 6 小时)在整个年龄范围内对于 MIC≤0.5mg/L 的病原体是足够的。增加频率(间隔 4 小时)的类似日剂量可覆盖至 MIC 2mg/L,而对于 MIC 4mg/L,则需要负荷剂量加持续输注方案。
重症患儿需要更高的头孢噻肟剂量才能获得充分的暴露量。为了提高对中度敏感病原体的目标达成率,建议增加剂量频率或持续输注。