Suppr超能文献

抗血栓药物治疗患者的富白细胞和血小板纤维蛋白膜的机械性能和细胞含量。

Mechanical properties and cellular content of leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin membranes of patients on antithrombotic drugs.

机构信息

OMFS-IMPATH Research Group, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Department of Mechanical Engineering, FIBEr KU Leuven Core Facility for Biomechanical Experimentation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

J Periodontal Res. 2022 Jun;57(3):623-631. doi: 10.1111/jre.12991. Epub 2022 Apr 6.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to examine the potential influence of antithrombotics on leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) membranes.

METHODS

Tensile tests and cell counts were performed with L-PRF membranes originating from patients on anticoagulants and antiplatelets versus patients not taking antithrombotics.

RESULTS

For the tensile tests, 13 control patients, 12 on anticoagulants, and 10 on antiplatelets donated blood. Compared to controls, membranes from anticoagulated donors were weaker (strength 0.57 ± 0.24 MPa vs. 0.80 ± 0.27 MPa, p = .03) and could not be stretched as far (1.8 ± 0.3 vs. 2.1 ± 0.3 times the initial length, p = .01). For the cell counting, 23 control patients, 16 on anticoagulants, and 16 on antiplatelets donated blood. The percentage of platelets was ±50% in the three groups. The percentage of leukocytes was lower in the anticoagulant group compared with controls (69 ± 10% vs. 78 ± 8%, p = .04). However, because of the unknown error of method, it is questionable whether the statistical significance is meaningful. There was no difference between membranes from the control group and the group on antiplatelets.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that L-PRF membranes originating from patients on anticoagulants are weaker, stretch less far, and contain less leukocytes than L-PRF membranes of patients not taking these drugs.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在探讨抗栓药物对白细胞和血小板富纤维蛋白(L-PRF)膜的潜在影响。

方法

对来自正在接受抗凝和抗血小板治疗的患者与未接受抗栓药物治疗的患者的 L-PRF 膜进行拉伸试验和细胞计数。

结果

在拉伸试验中,13 名对照患者、12 名抗凝患者和 10 名抗血小板患者捐献了血液。与对照组相比,抗凝供体的膜较弱(强度 0.57±0.24 MPa 比 0.80±0.27 MPa,p=0.03),且不能拉伸到那么远(1.8±0.3 倍比 2.1±0.3 倍初始长度,p=0.01)。在细胞计数方面,23 名对照患者、16 名抗凝患者和 16 名抗血小板患者捐献了血液。三组血小板百分比均为±50%。与对照组相比,抗凝组的白细胞百分比较低(69±10%比 78±8%,p=0.04)。然而,由于方法的未知误差,统计显著性是否有意义值得怀疑。对照组和抗血小板组的膜之间没有差异。

结论

我们的结果表明,来自正在接受抗凝治疗的患者的 L-PRF 膜比未接受这些药物治疗的患者的 L-PRF 膜更弱、拉伸程度更低且白细胞含量更少。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验