Department of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.
Mov Disord. 2022 Jul;37(7):1483-1494. doi: 10.1002/mds.29022. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
Primary dystonia is conventionally considered as a motor disorder, though an emerging literature reports associated cognitive dysfunction.
Here, we conducted meta-analyses on studies comparing clinical measures of cognition in persons with primary dystonia and healthy controls (HCs).
We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and PsycINFO (January 2000-October 2020). Analyses were modeled under random effects. We used Hedge's g as a bias-corrected estimate of effect size, where negative values indicate lower performance in dystonia versus controls. Between-study heterogeneity and bias were primarily assessed with Cochran's Q, I , and Egger's regression.
From 866 initial results, 20 studies met criteria for analysis (dystonia n = 739, controls n = 643; 254 effect sizes extracted). Meta-analysis showed a significant combined effect size of primary dystonia across all studies (g = -0.56, P < 0.001), with low heterogeneity (Q = 25.26, P = 0.15, I = 24.78). Within-domain effects of primary dystonia were motor speed = -0.84, nonmotor speed = -0.83, global cognition = -0.65, language = -0.54, executive functioning = -0.53, learning/memory = -0.46, visuospatial/construction = -0.44, and simple/complex attention = -0.37 (P-values <0.01). High heterogeneity was observed in the motor/nonmotor speed and learning/memory domains. There was no evidence of publication bias. Moderator analyses were mostly negative but possibly underpowered. Blepharospasm samples showed worse performance than other focal/cervical dystonias. Those with inherited (ie, genetic) disease etiology demonstrated worse performance than acquired.
Dystonia patients consistently demonstrated lower performances on neuropsychological tests versus HCs. Effect sizes were generally moderate in strength, clustering around -0.50 SD units. Within the speed domain, results suggested cognitive slowing beyond effects from motor symptoms. Overall, findings indicate dystonia patients experience multidomain cognitive difficulties, as detected by neuropsychological tests. © 2022 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
原发性肌张力障碍通常被认为是一种运动障碍,尽管不断有文献报道与之相关的认知功能障碍。
本研究对原发性肌张力障碍患者与健康对照者(HCs)认知临床评估的研究进行了荟萃分析。
我们检索了 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、Scopus 和 PsycINFO(2000 年 1 月至 2020 年 10 月)。分析采用随机效应模型。我们使用 Hedge's g 作为效应大小的校正估计值,负值表示肌张力障碍患者的表现低于对照组。主要使用 Cochran's Q、I 和 Egger 回归评估异质性和偏倚。
从 866 个初始结果中,有 20 项研究符合分析标准(肌张力障碍组 n=739,对照组 n=643;提取了 254 个效应量)。荟萃分析显示,所有研究的原发性肌张力障碍均有显著的综合效应(g=-0.56,P<0.001),异质性较低(Q=25.26,P=0.15,I=24.78)。原发性肌张力障碍的特定领域效应包括运动速度=-0.84,非运动速度=-0.83,整体认知=-0.65,语言=-0.54,执行功能=-0.53,学习/记忆=-0.46,视空间/结构=-0.44,简单/复杂注意力=-0.37(P 值均<0.01)。在运动/非运动速度和学习/记忆领域观察到较高的异质性。未发现发表偏倚。调节分析结果多为阴性,但可能因效能不足。眼睑痉挛样本的表现较其他局灶性/颈性肌张力障碍差。遗传性(即遗传)疾病病因患者的表现较获得性疾病患者差。
与 HCs 相比,肌张力障碍患者在神经心理学测试中的表现始终较差。效应大小普遍处于中等强度,集中在-0.50 个标准差单位左右。在速度域中,结果表明认知速度减慢,超出了运动症状的影响。总的来说,这些发现表明肌张力障碍患者通过神经心理学测试表现出多种认知困难。