Suppr超能文献

基于位置、尺度和形状方法的广义相加模型的孕周别出生体重新参考值:一项人群研究

A New Birthweight Reference by Gestational Age: A Population Study Based on the Generalized Additive Model for Location, Scale, and Shape Method.

作者信息

Wu Qiong, Zhang Hui-Yun, Zhang Li, Xu Yue-Qin, Sun Jin, Gao Nan-Nan, Qiao Xiu-Yun, Li Yan

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Child Health Care Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong, First Medical University, Jinan, China.

Department of Pediatrics, Shandong Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Jinan, China.

出版信息

Front Pediatr. 2022 Mar 21;10:810203. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.810203. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is important to choose a suitable birthweight reference to assess newborns, especially those that are small for gestational age (SGA). Currently, there is no regional standard reference for the north of China or for Shandong province.

METHODS

A total of 130,911 data records of singleton, live neonates born at 24-42 weeks of gestation were collected from 2016 to 2018 in Shandong province. A new birthweight-for-gestational age percentile reference was constructed based on the Generalized Additive Model for Location, Scale and Shape (GAMLSS) package in R version 3.5. The established gestational age weight curve was compared separately with the Fenton curve, INTERGROWTH-21st curve, and the Chinese Neonatal Network Standard curve of 2015.

RESULTS

We established the reference values of birthweight by gestational age at the 3rd, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th, and 97th percentiles. Newborns had much heavier birthweights than those in the INTERGROWTH-21st and Fenton curves at most gestational ages. Although the newborns' birthweight references were closer to the Chinese Neonatal Network Standard except a few for gestational age, this study and INTERGROWTH-21st had similar birthweight curve shapes.

CONCLUSIONS

There are obvious differences among the criteria for newborn birthweights. Therefore, it is more accurate to assess newborns using the local birthweight reference.

摘要

背景

选择合适的出生体重参考标准对于评估新生儿,尤其是小于胎龄儿(SGA)非常重要。目前,中国北方或山东省尚无区域标准参考。

方法

收集了2016年至2018年山东省130911例孕24 - 42周单胎、活产新生儿的数据记录。基于R 3.5版本中的位置、尺度和形状广义相加模型(GAMLSS)软件包构建了新的胎龄别出生体重百分位数参考标准。将建立的胎龄体重曲线分别与Fenton曲线、INTERGROWTH-21st曲线和2015年中国新生儿网络标准曲线进行比较。

结果

我们建立了第3、10、25、50、75、90和97百分位数的胎龄别出生体重参考值。在大多数胎龄时,新生儿的出生体重比INTERGROWTH-21st曲线和Fenton曲线中的新生儿重得多。尽管除了少数胎龄外,新生儿的出生体重参考值更接近中国新生儿网络标准,但本研究和INTERGROWTH-21st的出生体重曲线形状相似。

结论

新生儿出生体重标准之间存在明显差异。因此,使用当地出生体重参考标准评估新生儿更为准确。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31e9/8978627/cf2a69cef392/fped-10-810203-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验