Wu Hongyi, Li Xiaoye, Qian Juying, Zhao Xin, Yao Yao, Lv Qianzhou, Ge Junbo
Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Mar 21;13:854867. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.854867. eCollection 2022.
Growing evidence indicated that CYP2C19 genotypes could only explain a fraction of the pharmacodynamic response to clopidogrel, while a number of clinical factors also have contributing roles. Our objective was to develop a new risk score to improve prognostication of ischemic events in Chinese patients treated with clopidogrel. A new risk score was developed and internally validated in 445 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing coronary stenting. The final score was named the GeneFA score based on the inclusion of CYP2C19 genotype, fibrinogen, and age. External validation of the GeneFA score and comparison with the ABCD-GENE score were performed in an independent ACS cohort. Based on the observed frequencies of high platelet reactivity (HRPR) in relation to the GeneFA risk score, a relatively higher clinical HRPR was observed in the upper quintile with a representative score of 3 (52.90%) and 4 (59.10%), whereas it was found less frequently in groups with scores 0 (6.70%), 1 (15.10%), and 2 (16.70%). Participants with a GeneFA score >2 had an increased risk of HRPR (54.3 14.7%, < 0.001) and ischemic recurrence (20.7 5.4%, < 0.001). The GeneFA score exhibited a better prediction for high HRPR patients as compared to the ABCD-GENE score ( < 0.001). In the validation population, GeneFA illustrated a similarly high prognostic value for HRPR incidence (C-statistic: 0.855 for GeneFA and 0.843 for ABCD-GENE) and ischemic recurrence (C-statistic: 0.726 for GeneFA and 0.724 for ABCD-GENE) on clopidogrel as compared to ABCD-GENE. The GeneFA risk score had a moderate predictive ability for HRPR on clopidogrel for CAD patients in Chinese populations. The predictive value of the GeneFA score was consistent with the ABCD-GENE score for HRPR identification.
越来越多的证据表明,CYP2C19基因型只能解释氯吡格雷药效学反应的一部分,而一些临床因素也起作用。我们的目标是开发一种新的风险评分,以改善接受氯吡格雷治疗的中国患者缺血事件的预后。在445例接受冠状动脉支架置入术的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者中开发并内部验证了一种新的风险评分。最终评分基于CYP2C19基因型、纤维蛋白原和年龄被命名为GeneFA评分。在一个独立的ACS队列中对GeneFA评分进行外部验证并与ABCD-GENE评分进行比较。根据观察到的高血小板反应性(HRPR)与GeneFA风险评分的频率关系,在代表评分为3(52.90%)和4(59.10%)的上五分位数中观察到相对较高的临床HRPR,而在评分为0(6.70%)、1(15.10%)和2(16.70%) 的组中较少见。GeneFA评分>2的参与者发生HRPR的风险增加(54.3±14.7%,P<0.001)和缺血复发风险增加(20.7±5.4%,P<0.001)。与ABCD-GENE评分相比,GeneFA评分对高HRPR患者表现出更好的预测能力(P<0.001)。在验证人群中,与ABCD-GENE相比,GeneFA对氯吡格雷治疗的HRPR发生率(C统计量:GeneFA为0.855,ABCD-GENE为0.843)和缺血复发(C统计量:GeneFA为0.726,ABCD-GENE为0.724)显示出同样高的预后价值。GeneFA风险评分对中国人群CAD患者氯吡格雷治疗的HRPR具有中等预测能力。GeneFA评分在HRPR识别方面的预测价值与ABCD-GENE评分一致。