• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

载药微球或传统经动脉化疗栓塞联合阿帕替尼治疗伴有门静脉癌栓的肝细胞癌的疗效。

The efficacy of drug-eluting bead or conventional transarterial chemoembolization plus apatinib for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.

Department of Interventional Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 6;12(1):5725. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09609-8.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-09609-8
PMID:35388064
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8987033/
Abstract

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with apatinib has been used for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and the efficacy is good. The study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting bead TACE plus apatinib (D-TACE-A) with conventional TACE plus apatinib (C-TACE-A) in the treatment of HCC with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). A total of 130 continuous patients who received D-TACE-A or C-TACE-A were included in the study from January 2017 to June 2020. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce potential selection bias. Before PSM, the median overall survival (mOS) (14 months) and median progression-free survival (mPFS) (7 months) in the C-TACE-A group were longer than the mOS (9 months; P = 0.001) and mPFS (4 months; P = 0.001) in the D-TACE-A group. After PSM, the mOS (14 months vs 9 months; P = 0.039) and mPFS (7 months vs 5 months; P = 0.009) in the C-TACE-A group were longer than those in the D-TACE-A group. In the multivariate regression analysis, C-TACE-A reduced the mortality rate and tumor progression rate compared with D-TACE-A. For the subgroup analysis, patients with VP1-2, without extrahepatic metastases, and with multiple TACE sessions who received C-TACE-A had a lower death risk and tumor progression risk than patients who received D-TACE-A. Before PSM, there was no statistically significant difference in any grade or grade III/IV adverse events (all P > 0.05). C-TACE-A could prolong mOS and mPFS in patients with PVTT, especially for patients with VP1-2 stage PVTT, no extrahepatic tumor metastases, and multiple TACE sessions.

摘要

经导管动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)联合阿帕替尼已用于治疗晚期肝细胞癌(HCC),疗效良好。本研究旨在比较载药微球 TACE 联合阿帕替尼(D-TACE-A)与常规 TACE 联合阿帕替尼(C-TACE-A)治疗伴有门静脉癌栓(PVTT)的 HCC 的疗效和安全性。本研究共纳入 2017 年 1 月至 2020 年 6 月连续接受 D-TACE-A 或 C-TACE-A 治疗的 130 例患者。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)降低潜在选择偏倚。PSM 前,C-TACE-A 组中位总生存期(mOS)(14 个月)和中位无进展生存期(mPFS)(7 个月)长于 D-TACE-A 组的 mOS(9 个月;P=0.001)和 mPFS(4 个月;P=0.001)。PSM 后,C-TACE-A 组的 mOS(14 个月比 9 个月;P=0.039)和 mPFS(7 个月比 5 个月;P=0.009)长于 D-TACE-A 组。多因素回归分析显示,与 D-TACE-A 相比,C-TACE-A 降低了死亡率和肿瘤进展率。亚组分析显示,VP1-2 期、无肝外转移和多次 TACE 治疗的患者接受 C-TACE-A 治疗的死亡风险和肿瘤进展风险低于接受 D-TACE-A 治疗的患者。PSM 前,任何级别或 3/4 级不良事件发生率均无统计学差异(均 P>0.05)。C-TACE-A 可延长伴有 PVTT 的患者的 mOS 和 mPFS,尤其是对于 VP1-2 期 PVTT、无肝外肿瘤转移和多次 TACE 治疗的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/645e/8987033/90014eac57f5/41598_2022_9609_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/645e/8987033/1e1d226d0769/41598_2022_9609_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/645e/8987033/4819fb35658f/41598_2022_9609_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/645e/8987033/90014eac57f5/41598_2022_9609_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/645e/8987033/1e1d226d0769/41598_2022_9609_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/645e/8987033/4819fb35658f/41598_2022_9609_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/645e/8987033/90014eac57f5/41598_2022_9609_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The efficacy of drug-eluting bead or conventional transarterial chemoembolization plus apatinib for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus.载药微球或传统经动脉化疗栓塞联合阿帕替尼治疗伴有门静脉癌栓的肝细胞癌的疗效。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 6;12(1):5725. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09609-8.
2
Apatinib Combined With Transarterial Chemoembolization in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.阿帕替尼联合经肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌合并门静脉癌栓:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Clin Ther. 2019 Aug;41(8):1463-1476. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.04.036. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
3
The safety and efficacy of percutaneous ethanol injection in the treatment of tumor thrombus in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus.经皮乙醇注射治疗伴有门静脉癌栓的晚期肝细胞癌肿瘤血栓的安全性和有效性。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 Feb;47(2):858-868. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03349-5. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
4
Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined With Apatinib Plus PD-1 Inhibitors for Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.经导管动脉化疗栓塞联合阿帕替尼加 PD-1 抑制剂治疗合并门静脉癌栓的肝细胞癌:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2023 May 1;14(5):e00581. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000581.
5
Efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with either I seed implantation or apatinib in hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: A retrospective comparative study.经导管动脉化疗栓塞联合 ^125I 粒子植入或阿帕替尼治疗合并门静脉癌栓肝癌的疗效和安全性:一项回顾性对比研究。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2020;16(7):1691-1697. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_1587_20.
6
Gamma knife radiosurgery versus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a propensity score matching study.伽玛刀放射外科与经导管动脉化疗栓塞治疗合并门静脉癌栓的肝细胞癌:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Hepatol Int. 2022 Aug;16(4):858-867. doi: 10.1007/s12072-022-10339-2. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
7
Transarterial chemoembolization plus lenvatinib versus transarterial chemoembolization plus sorafenib as first-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: A prospective randomized study.经动脉化疗栓塞术联合仑伐替尼对比经动脉化疗栓塞术联合索拉非尼作为伴门静脉癌栓的肝细胞癌一线治疗的前瞻性随机研究。
Cancer. 2021 Oct 15;127(20):3782-3793. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33677. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
8
DEM-TACE as the initial treatment could improve the clinical efficacy of the hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a retrospective controlled study.DEM-TACE 作为初始治疗可提高伴有门静脉癌栓的肝细胞癌的临床疗效:一项回顾性对照研究。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Nov 30;22(1):1242. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10361-5.
9
A Comparative Analysis of Efficacy of Apatinib Combined with Transarterial Chemoembolization and Transarterial Chemoembolization Alone in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus.阿帕替尼联合经动脉化疗栓塞术与单纯经动脉化疗栓塞术治疗门静脉癌栓型肝细胞癌的疗效比较分析
J Oncol. 2022 Mar 21;2022:1255133. doi: 10.1155/2022/1255133. eCollection 2022.
10
Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Apatinib Compared with Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Apatinib in the Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞联合阿帕替尼与传统经动脉化疗栓塞联合阿帕替尼治疗不可切除肝细胞癌的疗效比较
Cancer Manag Res. 2021 Jul 6;13:5391-5402. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S314762. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization versus regorafenib monotherapy in colorectal cancer liver metastasis patients who fail standard treatment regimens.在标准治疗方案失败的结直肠癌肝转移患者中,regorafenib 联合载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞与regorafenib 单药治疗的疗效和安全性。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021 Oct;147(10):2993-3002. doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03708-1. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
2
A Nomogram for Preoperative Estimation of Microvascular Invasion Risk in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Single-Center Analyses With Internal Validation.肝细胞癌微血管侵犯风险术前评估的列线图:单中心分析及内部验证
Front Oncol. 2021 Mar 4;11:616976. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.616976. eCollection 2021.
3
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
4
Lack of Response to Transarterial Chemoembolization for Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Abandon or Repeat?中晚期肝细胞癌经肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗后无反应:放弃还是重复?
Radiology. 2021 Mar;298(3):680-692. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021202289. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
5
Transarterial chemoembolization combined with apatinib versus transarterial chemoembolization alone for hepatocellular carcinoma with macroscopic vascular invasion: A propensity score matching analysis.经动脉化疗栓塞联合阿帕替尼与单纯经动脉化疗栓塞治疗伴肉眼可见血管侵犯的肝细胞癌:一项倾向评分匹配分析
J Cancer Res Ther. 2020 Sep;16(5):1063-1068. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_801_19.
6
Lymphocyte to monocyte ratio-based nomogram for predicting outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib.基于淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值的列线图预测索拉非尼治疗肝细胞癌的预后。
Hepatol Int. 2020 Sep;14(5):776-787. doi: 10.1007/s12072-020-10076-4. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
7
Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined With Apatinib for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.经动脉化疗栓塞联合阿帕替尼治疗晚期肝细胞癌:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Front Oncol. 2020 Jul 7;10:970. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00970. eCollection 2020.
8
The PPRD score stratifies patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein tumor thrombus treated with sorafenib plus transarterial chemoembolization.PPRD 评分可对接受索拉非尼联合经动脉化疗栓塞治疗的肝细胞癌合并门静脉癌栓患者进行分层。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Jan;31(1):232-243. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07078-z. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
9
A comparison of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization used with and without apatinib for intermediate- to advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.阿帕替尼联合与不联合经动脉化疗栓塞术治疗中晚期肝细胞癌的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Apr;8(8):542. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.02.125.
10
A nomogram to predict survival of patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolization combined with microwave ablation.列线图预测经动脉化疗栓塞联合微波消融治疗中期肝细胞癌患者的生存。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Apr;30(4):2377-2390. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06438-8. Epub 2020 Jan 3.