• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Disparities in surgical outcomes for low socioeconomic status patients in Australia.澳大利亚低社会经济地位患者手术结果的差异。
ANZ J Surg. 2022 May;92(5):1026-1032. doi: 10.1111/ans.17675. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
2
Emergency to Elective Surgery Ratio as a Disparities Sensitive Surgical Access Metric, A Study of Low Socioeconomic Status in Australia.急诊与择期手术比例作为一种反映手术可及性差异的指标:澳大利亚低社会经济地位人群的研究
World J Surg. 2022 Apr;46(4):776-783. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06434-4. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
3
Socioeconomic disparities in rates of facial fracture surgeries for women and men at a regional tertiary care centre in Australia.澳大利亚一家地区性三级护理中心的女性和男性面部骨折手术率的社会经济差异。
ANZ J Surg. 2022 Jul;92(7-8):1700-1705. doi: 10.1111/ans.17763. Epub 2022 May 9.
4
Disparities in Advanced Peripheral Arterial Disease Presentation by Socioeconomic Status.社会经济地位对晚期外周动脉疾病表现的影响存在差异。
World J Surg. 2022 Jun;46(6):1500-1507. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06513-0. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
5
Economic Disparities in Patients Undergoing Sigmoidectomy.接受乙状结肠切除术患者的经济差异
JSLS. 2018 Oct-Dec;22(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2018.00066.
6
Socioeconomic disparities in mortality after cancer surgery: failure to rescue.癌症手术后死亡率的社会经济差异:未能抢救。
JAMA Surg. 2014 May;149(5):475-81. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.5076.
7
Short-term outcomes after surgical resection for colorectal cancer in South Australia.南澳大利亚州结直肠癌手术切除后的短期结局
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Apr;23(2):316-324. doi: 10.1111/jep.12612. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
8
Socioeconomic disadvantage and its impact on colorectal cancer in Australia: a scoping review.社会经济劣势及其对澳大利亚结直肠癌的影响:范围综述。
ANZ J Surg. 2022 Nov;92(11):2808-2815. doi: 10.1111/ans.18081. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
9
The association between patient education level and economic status on outcomes following surgical management of (fracture) non-union.患者教育水平与经济状况对骨折不愈合手术治疗后结局的关联。
Injury. 2019 Feb;50(2):344-350. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.12.013. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
10
Analysing risk factors for poorer breast cancer outcomes in residents of lower socioeconomic areas of Australia.分析澳大利亚社会经济较低地区居民乳腺癌预后较差的风险因素。
Aust Health Rev. 2014 May;38(2):134-41. doi: 10.1071/AH13080.

引用本文的文献

1
Measurement of Socioeconomic Deprivation in Orthopaedic Trauma: A Scoping Review.骨科创伤中社会经济剥夺的测量:一项范围综述。
JBJS Rev. 2025 Sep 8;13(9). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.25.00087. eCollection 2025 Sep 1.
2
How can we promote gender and sex equality in orthopaedics and traumatology surgery? Research avenues perspectives.我们如何在骨科和创伤外科促进性别平等?研究途径与展望。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Aug 14;20(1):767. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06170-8.
3
Expanding Access to Minor Hand Surgery Procedures in Underrepresented Patient Populations: Safety and Efficacy of a Minor Procedure Clinic in an Urban Safety-Net Hospital.在代表性不足的患者群体中扩大小型手部手术的可及性:城市安全网医院小型手术诊所的安全性和有效性
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2025 Jul 2;9(7). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-25-00159. eCollection 2025 Jul 1.
4
Impact of major postoperative complications on employment and earnings after elective hip or knee replacement surgery: a population-based matched cohort study.择期髋关节或膝关节置换术后主要并发症对就业和收入的影响:一项基于人群的匹配队列研究。
Can J Anaesth. 2025 May 12. doi: 10.1007/s12630-025-02960-0.
5
Influence of socioeconomic status on postoperative outcomes in acute type A aortic dissection repair.社会经济地位对急性A型主动脉夹层修复术后结果的影响。
JTCVS Open. 2025 Jan 31;24:332-340. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2025.01.013. eCollection 2025 Apr.
6
Retrospective Cohort Study to Determine the Effect of Socioeconomic Status and Distance to Hospital on Negative Appendicectomy Rates in a Rural Setting.一项回顾性队列研究,以确定社会经济地位和距离医院的远近对农村地区阴性阑尾切除术发生率的影响。
Aust J Rural Health. 2025 Apr;33(2):e70026. doi: 10.1111/ajr.70026.
7
Food Insecurity and Clinical Outcomes in Surgical Trauma Patients.外科创伤患者的食物不安全状况与临床结局
JAMA Surg. 2025 May 1;160(5):545-552. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.0045.
8
Smoking increases risk of complication after musculoskeletal surgery: analysis of single immune parameter to predict complication risk.吸烟会增加肌肉骨骼手术后并发症的风险:单一免疫参数分析以预测并发症风险。
EXCLI J. 2024 Jul 13;23:967-990. doi: 10.17179/excli2024-7306. eCollection 2024.
9
Social Deprivation is Associated with Increased Pain in Patients Presenting with Neuropathic Pain.社会剥夺与患有神经性疼痛的患者疼痛加剧有关。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Jun 27;12(6):e5931. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005931. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
The contribution of household income to rectal cancer patient characteristics, treatment, and outcomes from 2010 to 2020.2010年至2020年家庭收入对直肠癌患者特征、治疗及预后的影响
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 22;10(13):e33318. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33318. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of socioeconomic deprivation on incidence and outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection repair in New Zealand.新西兰社会经济剥夺对急性 A 型主动脉夹层修复发病率和结局的影响。
J Card Surg. 2021 Jun;36(6):2035-2043. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15457. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
2
Effect of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Factors on Readmissions and Mortality After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.社区社会经济因素对冠状动脉旁路移植术后再入院和死亡率的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Feb;111(2):561-567. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.05.102. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
3
Socioeconomic deprivation and mortality after emergency laparotomy: an observational epidemiological study.社会经济剥夺与急诊剖腹术后死亡率:一项观察性流行病学研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Jan;124(1):73-83. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.08.022.
4
Measuring the quality of surgical care provision to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients.衡量为原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民患者提供外科护理的质量。
ANZ J Surg. 2019 Dec;89(12):1537-1538. doi: 10.1111/ans.15535.
5
Associations Between Social Risk Factors and Surgical Site Infections After Colectomy and Abdominal Hysterectomy.社会风险因素与结肠切除术和腹式子宫切除术术后手术部位感染的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1912339. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.12339.
6
Distressed communities are associated with worse outcomes after coronary artery bypass surgery.在冠状动脉旁路手术后,处于困境中的社区与更差的结果相关。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Aug;160(2):425-432.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.06.104. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
7
Community level socioeconomic status association with surgical outcomes and resource utilisation in a regional cohort: a prospective registry analysis.社区层面的社会经济地位与区域性队列中手术结果和资源利用的关系:一项前瞻性登记分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Mar;29(3):232-237. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009800. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
8
The Impact of Income on Emergency General Surgery Outcomes in Urban and Rural Areas.城乡收入对急诊普通外科结局的影响。
J Surg Res. 2020 Jan;245:629-635. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.08.010. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
9
Perspective: Identifying and Addressing Disparities in Surgical Access: A Health Systems Call to Action.观点:识别并解决手术可及性方面的差异:医疗系统的行动呼吁。
Ann Surg. 2020 Mar;271(3):427-430. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003572.
10
Socioeconomic Distressed Communities Index associated with worse limb-related outcomes after infrainguinal bypass.社会经济贫困社区指数与下肢旁路手术后肢体相关结局较差相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Sep;70(3):786-794.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.10.123. Epub 2019 Jun 14.

澳大利亚低社会经济地位患者手术结果的差异。

Disparities in surgical outcomes for low socioeconomic status patients in Australia.

机构信息

College of Medicine and Dentistry, The James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.

General Practice/Family medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2022 May;92(5):1026-1032. doi: 10.1111/ans.17675. Epub 2022 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1111/ans.17675
PMID:35388595
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9322460/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are disparities in surgical outcomes for patients of low socioeconomic status globally, including in countries with universal healthcare systems. There is limited data on the impact of low socioeconomic status on surgical outcomes in Australia. This study examines surgical outcomes by both self-reported unemployment and neighbourhood level socioeconomic status in Australia.

METHODS

A retrospective administrative data review was conducted at a tertiary care centre over a 10-year period (2008-2018) including all adult surgical patients. Multivariable logistic regression adjusting for year, age, sex and Charlson Comorbidity Index was performed.

RESULTS

106 197 patients underwent a surgical procedure in the decade examined. The overall adverse event rates were mortality (1.13%), total postoperative complications (10.9%), failure to rescue (0.75%) and return to theatre (4.31%). Following multivariable testing, unemployed and low socioeconomic patients had a higher risk of postoperative mortality (OR 2.06 (1.50-2.82), OR 1.37 (1.15-1.64)), all complications (OR 1.43 (1.31-1.56), OR 1.21 (1.14-1.28)), failure to rescue (OR 2.03 (1.39-2.95), OR 1.38 (1.11-1.72)) and return to theatre (OR 1.42 (1.27-1.59), OR 1.24 (1.14-1.36)) (P < 0.005 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite universal healthcare, there are disparities in surgical adverse events for patients of low socioeconomic status in Australia. Disparities in surgical outcomes can stem from three facets: a patient's access to healthcare (the severity of disease at the time of presentation), variation in perioperative care delivery, and social determinants of health. Further work is required to pinpoint why these disparities are present and to evaluate the impact of strategies that aim to reduce disparities.

摘要

背景

全球范围内,包括在拥有全民医疗保健系统的国家,低社会经济地位的患者在手术结果方面存在差异。关于低社会经济地位对澳大利亚手术结果的影响,数据有限。本研究通过自我报告的失业和澳大利亚社区经济地位两个方面来研究手术结果。

方法

在一个三级保健中心进行了一项回顾性行政数据分析,时间跨度为 10 年(2008-2018 年),包括所有成年手术患者。对年、年龄、性别和 Charlson 合并症指数进行多变量逻辑回归调整。

结果

在十年的检查中,有 106197 名患者接受了手术。总的不良事件发生率为死亡率(1.13%)、全术后并发症(10.9%)、抢救失败(0.75%)和重返手术室(4.31%)。经过多变量检验,失业和低社会经济地位的患者术后死亡风险更高(OR 2.06(1.50-2.82),OR 1.37(1.15-1.64))、所有并发症(OR 1.43(1.31-1.56),OR 1.21(1.14-1.28))、抢救失败(OR 2.03(1.39-2.95),OR 1.38(1.11-1.72))和重返手术室(OR 1.42(1.27-1.59),OR 1.24(1.14-1.36))(所有 P<0.005)。

结论

尽管有全民医疗保健,但澳大利亚低社会经济地位患者的手术不良事件存在差异。手术结果的差异可能源于三个方面:患者获得医疗保健的机会(就诊时疾病的严重程度)、围手术期护理提供情况的差异以及健康的社会决定因素。需要进一步努力找出存在这些差异的原因,并评估旨在减少差异的策略的影响。