• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康偏好研究:医学放射科学概述。

Health preference research: An overview for medical radiation sciences.

机构信息

Townsville Cancer Centre, Townsville University Hospital, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.

Radiation Oncology Princess Alexandra Hospital Raymond Terrace, Metro South Health Service, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

J Med Radiat Sci. 2022 Sep;69(3):394-402. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.580. Epub 2022 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1002/jmrs.580
PMID:35388630
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9442284/
Abstract

Understanding preferences of key stakeholders including patients, clinicians and policymakers can inform clinical practice, workforce and policy. It also allows health services to evaluate existing clinical practices, policies and procedures. This commentary aims to introduce medical radiation professionals to health preference research by describing commonly used preference methodologies, with a particular focus on discrete choice experiments. Relevant examples of health preference research will be highlighted to demonstrate the application of health preference research in medical radiation sciences.

摘要

了解包括患者、临床医生和政策制定者在内的主要利益相关者的偏好,可以为临床实践、劳动力和政策提供信息。它还使卫生服务部门能够评估现有的临床实践、政策和程序。本评论旨在通过描述常用的偏好方法,特别是离散选择实验,向医学放射专业人员介绍健康偏好研究。将重点介绍健康偏好研究的相关示例,以展示健康偏好研究在医学放射科学中的应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8e8/9442284/099b2cbee4c6/JMRS-69-394-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8e8/9442284/ed41df3229c9/JMRS-69-394-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8e8/9442284/099b2cbee4c6/JMRS-69-394-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8e8/9442284/ed41df3229c9/JMRS-69-394-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8e8/9442284/099b2cbee4c6/JMRS-69-394-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Health preference research: An overview for medical radiation sciences.健康偏好研究:医学放射科学概述。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2022 Sep;69(3):394-402. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.580. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
2
Integrating evidence into policy and sustainable disability services delivery in western New South Wales, Australia: the 'wobbly hub and double spokes' project.将证据纳入澳大利亚新南威尔士州西部地区的政策和可持续残疾服务提供中:“摇摆枢纽和双辐条”项目。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Mar 21;12:70. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-70.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Discrete choice experiments of pharmacy services: a systematic review.药学服务的离散选择实验:一项系统评价。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Jun;38(3):620-30. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0221-1.
5
Public, medical professionals' and patients' preferences for the allocation of donor organs for transplantation: study protocol for discrete choice experiments.公众、医学专业人员和患者对移植供体器官分配的偏好:离散选择实验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 17;8(10):e026040. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026040.
6
Quantifying benefit-risk preferences for medical interventions: an overview of a growing empirical literature.量化医疗干预措施的获益-风险偏好:日益增长的实证文献概述。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Aug;11(4):319-29. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0028-y.
7
Measuring Patient Preferences: An Overview of Methods with a Focus on Discrete Choice Experiments.测量患者偏好:以离散选择实验为重点的方法概述
Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2018 May;44(2):337-347. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2018.01.009. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
8
9
Eliciting Preferences in Dentistry with Multiattribute Stated Preference Methods: A Systematic Review.使用多属性陈述偏好方法在牙科领域引出偏好:一项系统评价。
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2018 Oct;3(4):326-335. doi: 10.1177/2380084418780324. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
10

本文引用的文献

1
Patient Preferences for Anxiety and Depression Screening in Cancer Care: A Discrete Choice Experiment.患者对癌症护理中心焦虑和抑郁筛查的偏好:离散选择实验。
Value Health. 2021 Dec;24(12):1835-1844. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.05.014. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
2
A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments in Oncology Treatments.肿瘤治疗中离散选择实验的系统评价。
Patient. 2021 Nov;14(6):775-790. doi: 10.1007/s40271-021-00520-4. Epub 2021 May 5.
3
Respondent Understanding in Discrete Choice Experiments: A Scoping Review.应答者理解在离散选择实验中的应用:范围综述。
Patient. 2021 Jan;14(1):17-53. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00467-y. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
4
Patient perceptions and preferences about prostate fiducial markers and ultrasound motion monitoring procedures in radiation therapy treatment.患者对放射性治疗中前列腺基准标记物和超声运动监测程序的感知和偏好。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2021 Mar;68(1):37-43. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.438. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
5
Patient preferences for development in MRI scanner design: a survey of claustrophobic patients in a randomized study.患者对 MRI 扫描仪设计发展的偏好:一项在随机研究中对幽闭恐惧症患者的调查。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Mar;31(3):1325-1335. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07060-9. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
6
How Are Debriefing Questions Used in Health Discrete Choice Experiments? An Online Survey.如何在健康离散选择实验中使用汇报问题?一项在线调查。
Value Health. 2020 Mar;23(3):289-293. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.10.001. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
7
Correction to: Does this lung nodule need urgent review? A discrete choice experiment of Australian general practitioners.对《这个肺结节需要紧急复查吗?澳大利亚全科医生的离散选择实验》的更正
BMC Pulm Med. 2020 Feb 26;20(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12890-020-1085-2.
8
Can healthcare choice be predicted using stated preference data?能否使用意愿调查数据来预测医疗保健选择?
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Feb;246:112736. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112736. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
9
Preferences for portable ultrasound devices: a discrete choice experiment among abdominal aortic aneurysm surveillance patients and general ultrasound patients in England.便携式超声设备的偏好:英国腹主动脉瘤监测患者和普通超声患者的离散选择实验。
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 19;8(12):e025428. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025428.
10
Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future.健康经济学中的离散选择实验:过去、现在和未来。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Feb;37(2):201-226. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0734-2.