424 General Military Training Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Hell J Nucl Med. 2022 Jan-Apr;25(1):43-56. doi: 10.1967/s002449912436. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
We aimed to examine if single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) can discriminate between variants of frontotemporal dementia (FTD). As a secondary investigation we identify and establish the linguistic differences between those variants.
Nine patients with semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA), 8 with non-fluent variant primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA) and 17 with behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) were compared on Addenbrooke's cognitive examination-revised (ACE-R), auditory comprehension, oral expression and verbal fluency. All patients were also compared with healthy controls. Patients were evaluated using technetium-99m-hexamethylproyleneamine oxime (Tc-HMPAO) brain SPECT as a measure of regional cerebral flow.
Significant group differences between all patients and controls were found for ACE-R, auditory comprehension and oral expression. Semantic variant primary progressive aphasia patients performed higher in letter compared to category fluency with significant deficits in auditory comprehension and oral expression. Non-fluent variant primary progressive aphasia patients showed significant deficits in auditory comprehension but not oral expression while performed lightly worse in letter fluency compared to category. Behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia patients showed deficits in auditory comprehension and oral expression and performed similar in category and letter fluency. Single photon emission computed tomography analysis revealed left frontotemporal hypoperfusion extending to the right frontotemporal region in svPPA patients. Non-fluent variant primary progressive aphasia patients presented left frontotemporal hypoperfusion with participation of the left parietal and right frontotemporal regions. Behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia patients showed bilateral frontotemporal hypoperfusion compared to parietal and visual cortices.
Our findings suggest that SPECT may assist in the discrimination of the FTD variants. We also confirmed that bvFTD patients share similar language deficits with svPPA patients.
我们旨在研究单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)是否可以区分额颞叶痴呆(FTD)的变体。作为二次研究,我们确定并建立了这些变体之间的语言差异。
将 9 名语义性进行性失语症(svPPA)患者、8 名非流利性进行性失语症(nfvPPA)患者和 17 名行为性额颞叶痴呆(bvFTD)患者与 Addenbrooke 认知评估修订版(ACE-R)、听觉理解、口语表达和语言流畅性进行比较。所有患者也与健康对照组进行比较。使用锝-99m-六甲基丙烯酰胺肟(Tc-HMPAO)脑 SPECT 评估患者,作为区域性脑血流的测量。
所有患者与对照组在 ACE-R、听觉理解和口语表达方面均存在显著的组间差异。语义性进行性失语症患者在字母流畅性方面的表现优于类别流畅性,在听觉理解和口语表达方面存在显著缺陷。非流利性进行性失语症患者在听觉理解方面存在显著缺陷,但在口语表达方面没有缺陷,在字母流畅性方面的表现略差于类别。行为性额颞叶痴呆患者在听觉理解和口语表达方面存在缺陷,在类别和字母流畅性方面表现相似。SPECT 分析显示 svPPA 患者左额颞叶灌注不足,延伸至右额颞叶区域。非流利性进行性失语症患者表现为左额颞叶灌注不足,伴有左顶叶和右额颞叶区域参与。行为性额颞叶痴呆患者与顶叶和视觉皮质相比,表现为双侧额颞叶灌注不足。
我们的研究结果表明,SPECT 可能有助于 FTD 变体的鉴别。我们还证实,bvFTD 患者与 svPPA 患者共享相似的语言缺陷。