Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand.
Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Auckland, Building 507, Room 3008, Auckland, New Zealand.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2022 May;27(2):521-536. doi: 10.1007/s10459-022-10100-2. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
Despite being a mandated, foundational value in healthcare, research on compassion remains limited. Studying the individual, patient, clinical, and contextual factors that interfere with compassion-the "barriers"-may clarify our understanding of the origins of compassion and identify potential targets for improving patient-centred care. Studies of the related construct of empathy have suggested that medical students report declines with increasing clinical experience. In contrast, when comparing physicians with medical students, increased clinical experience predicts lower barriers to compassion. Whether-and how-a similar experience-related decline in the factors that interfere with compassion occurs across medical training remains unknown.
To describe how the barriers to compassion vary across clinical training in medical students.
New Zealand medical students (N = 351) in their clinical years (Years 4-6) completed measures of the Barriers to Physician Compassion (BPCQ) and potential covariates such as demographics, work burden factors, and dispositional factors. The BPCQ indexes the extent to which barriers in four domains (individual, patient, clinical, and contextual) interfere with a physician/student's compassion towards patients. Analyses of variance and regression analyses were used to explore the effect of year level on the four types of barriers.
Year 4 students reported slightly lower student-related, environmental and patient/family-related (but not clinical) barriers than Year 6 students (effect size: ɷ < 0.05); all barriers increased comparably across training. Controlling for relevant confounds, regression analyses confirmed that lower year level predicted lower barriers to compassion. Higher self-compassion, but not gender, predicted lower barriers.
In extending studies of empathy decline, this report suggests that students experience higher barriers to compassion as clinical training progresses. This is in contrast to existing studies contrasting physicians with medical students, where greater experience was associated with lower perceived barriers to compassion. Self-compassion may offset increases in barriers to care.
尽管同情是医疗保健中一项强制性的基本价值观,但对同情的研究仍然有限。研究干扰同情的个体、患者、临床和环境因素(即“障碍”),可以澄清我们对同情起源的理解,并确定改善以患者为中心的护理的潜在目标。对同理心这一相关结构的研究表明,医学生的同理心随着临床经验的增加而下降。相比之下,当比较医生和医学生时,更多的临床经验预测同情心障碍较低。在整个医学培训过程中,是否以及如何会出现类似的与经验相关的干扰同情心的因素下降,目前尚不清楚。
描述医学生临床培训过程中同情障碍的变化情况。
新西兰临床阶段(第 4-6 年)的医学生(N=351)完成了医师同情心障碍量表(BPCQ)和潜在的协变量(如人口统计学、工作负担因素和性格因素)的测量。BPCQ 评估了四个领域(个体、患者、临床和环境)的障碍对医生/学生对患者的同情心的干扰程度。方差分析和回归分析用于探讨年级水平对四种障碍的影响。
与第 6 年的学生相比,第 4 年的学生报告的与学生相关、环境和患者/家属相关的障碍(但不包括临床相关的障碍)略低(效应大小:ɷ<0.05);所有障碍在培训过程中都相应增加。在控制相关混杂因素后,回归分析证实,较低的年级水平预测同情心障碍较低。自我同情,而不是性别,预测较低的障碍。
在扩展同理心下降的研究方面,本报告表明,随着临床培训的进展,学生面临更高的同情心障碍。这与现有的将医生与医学生进行对比的研究相反,在这些研究中,更多的经验与较低的感知同情心障碍相关。自我同情可能会抵消对护理的障碍增加。