Department of Plants and Crops, Ghent University, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Faculty of Tropical AgriSciences (FTA), Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2022 Apr 7;18(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13002-022-00530-y.
As a hard-hit area during the COVID-19 pandemic, Belgium knew the highest mortality among people from sub-Saharan African descent, compared to any other group living in the country. After migration, people often maintain traditional perceptions and habits regarding health and healthcare, resulting in a high prevalence of traditional, complementary and alternative medicine use among different migrant communities in northern urban settings. Despite being the largest community of sub-Saharan African descent in Belgium, little is known on ethnobotanical practices of the Belgian Congolese community. We therefore conducted an exploratory study on the use of medicinal plants in the context of COVID-19 and perceptions on this new disease among members of the Congolese community in Belgium.
We conducted 16 in-depth semi-structured interviews with people of Congolese descent currently living in Belgium. Participants were selected using purposive sampling. Medicinal plant use in the context of COVID-19 was recorded through free-listing. Data on narratives, ideas and perceptions on the origin, cause/aetiology and overall measures against COVID-19 (including vaccination) were collected. Interview transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis.
Four overarching themes emerged from our data. Firstly, participants perceived the representation of the severity of COVID-19 by the Belgian media and government-and by extend by all governmental agencies in the global north-as exaggerated. As a result, traditional and complementary treatments were seen as feasible options to treat symptoms of the disease. Fifteen forms of traditional, complementary and alternative medicine were documented, of which thirteen were plants. Participants seem to fold back on their Congolese identity and traditional knowledge in seeking coping strategies to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic. Finally, institutional postcolonial distrust did not only seem to lead to distrust in official messages on the COVID-19 pandemic but also to feelings of vaccination hesitancy.
In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, participants in our study retreated to, reshaped and adapted traditional and culture-bound knowledge. This study suggests that the fragile and sensitive relationship between sub-Saharan African migrant groups and other social/ethnic groups in Belgium might play a role in their sensitivity to health-threatening situations, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,比利时是受影响最严重的地区之一,在该国生活的人群中,撒哈拉以南非洲裔的死亡率最高。移民后,人们往往对健康和医疗保持传统观念和习惯,导致不同移民群体在城市北部地区普遍使用传统、补充和替代医学。尽管比利时的撒哈拉以南非洲裔是最大的群体,但对于比利时刚果社区的民族植物学实践却知之甚少。因此,我们在比利时对刚果社区成员进行了一项关于 COVID-19 背景下药用植物使用情况以及对这种新疾病看法的探索性研究。
我们对目前居住在比利时的刚果裔人群进行了 16 次深入的半结构化访谈。参与者是通过目的性抽样选择的。通过自由列表记录了 COVID-19 背景下药用植物的使用情况。收集了有关叙事、对 COVID-19 的起源、病因/发病机制以及针对 COVID-19(包括疫苗接种)的整体措施的想法和看法。使用主题分析对访谈记录进行分析。
我们的数据中出现了四个总体主题。首先,参与者认为比利时媒体和政府——并通过全球北方的所有政府机构——对 COVID-19 严重程度的描述被夸大了。因此,传统和补充治疗被视为治疗疾病症状的可行选择。记录了 15 种传统、补充和替代医学形式,其中 13 种是植物。参与者似乎在寻求应对 COVID-19 大流行的应对策略时,回归到他们的刚果身份和传统知识。最后,机构后殖民不信任不仅似乎导致对 COVID-19 大流行的官方信息的不信任,还导致对疫苗接种犹豫不决的感觉。
在 COVID-19 大流行的背景下,我们研究中的参与者退回到、重塑和调整了传统和文化相关的知识。这项研究表明,撒哈拉以南非洲移民群体与比利时其他社会/族裔群体之间脆弱而敏感的关系可能在他们对健康威胁情况(如 COVID-19 大流行)的敏感性方面发挥作用。