• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于影响临床疏忽索赔选择因素的离散选择实验,以引出普通人群的偏好。

A Discrete Choice Experiment to Elicit General Population Preferences Around the Factors Influencing the Choice to Make Clinical Negligence Claims.

机构信息

School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK.

School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK.

出版信息

Value Health. 2022 Aug;25(8):1404-1415. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.01.020. Epub 2022 Apr 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2022.01.020
PMID:35393252
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This article determines public stated preferences around different factors that influence the choice to make clinical negligence claims against a national healthcare system.

METHODS

A large online survey was conducted using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) with the UK general population (N = 1013). DCE tasks involved a single profile and participants chose whether to make a claim for compensation (yes/no) after one of 3 randomly allocated patient safety incident (PSI) "scenarios" of different severities (mild, moderate, severe). DCE attributes described the actions of the healthcare system after a PSI and characteristics of the clinical negligence claims process. The data were modeled separately for each scenario (mild, moderate, severe) using logistic regression. Marginal effects and the probability of making a claim in a baseline case were estimated.

RESULTS

Probability of choosing to claim was reduced by receipt of an apology, investigation and prevention of recurrence of the PSI, and longer time until claim decision and increased by an easy and straightforward claims process and high chance of compensation and for the mild scenario higher compensation amounts. Marginal effects and baseline case probabilities differed by scenario severity.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest the actions of the healthcare system after a PSI and characteristics of the claims process have a larger impact on the probability of making a claim for milder PSIs. For more severe PSIs, a larger probability of making a claim was observed, and the choice was less influenced by the actions of the healthcare system after the PSI and characteristics of the claims process.

摘要

目的

本文旨在确定公众对影响向国家医疗保健系统提出临床疏忽索赔的不同因素的偏好。

方法

使用具有英国普通人群(N=1013)的离散选择实验(DCE)进行了一项大型在线调查。DCE 任务涉及单一档案,参与者在 3 种不同严重程度(轻度、中度、重度)的患者安全事件(PSI)“场景”之一后选择是否提出赔偿索赔(是/否)。DCE 属性描述了 PSI 后医疗保健系统的行动以及临床疏忽索赔过程的特征。使用逻辑回归分别为每个场景(轻度、中度、重度)对数据进行建模。估计了边际效应和基准案例中的索赔概率。

结果

接受道歉、调查和防止 PSI 再次发生、直到索赔决定的时间延长以及简化和直接的索赔流程以及高赔偿机会降低了选择索赔的可能性,而对于轻度情况,较高的赔偿金额则增加了选择索赔的可能性。边际效应和基准案例的概率因场景严重程度而异。

结论

结果表明,PSI 后医疗保健系统的行动和索赔过程的特征对轻度 PSI 提出索赔的可能性影响更大。对于更严重的 PSI,提出索赔的可能性更大,并且选择受 PSI 后医疗保健系统的行动和索赔过程的特征影响较小。

相似文献

1
A Discrete Choice Experiment to Elicit General Population Preferences Around the Factors Influencing the Choice to Make Clinical Negligence Claims.一项关于影响临床疏忽索赔选择因素的离散选择实验,以引出普通人群的偏好。
Value Health. 2022 Aug;25(8):1404-1415. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.01.020. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
2
Exploring the Factors that Drive Clinical Negligence Claims: Stated Preferences of Those Who Have Experienced Unintended Harm.探究引发医疗过失索赔的因素:意外受伤害者的既定偏好
Patient. 2024 May;17(3):301-317. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00674-x. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
3
Comparing Analytic Hierarchy Process and Discrete-Choice Experiment to Elicit Patient Preferences for Treatment Characteristics in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.比较层次分析法和离散选择实验以引出年龄相关性黄斑变性患者对治疗特征的偏好。
Value Health. 2017 Sep;20(8):1166-1173. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.04.022. Epub 2017 May 31.
4
Line of therapy and patient preferences regarding lung cancer treatment: a discrete-choice experiment.治疗方案选择和肺癌治疗相关的患者偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2021 Apr;37(4):643-653. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1888707. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
5
Survival or Mortality: Does Risk Attribute Framing Influence Decision-Making Behavior in a Discrete Choice Experiment?生存还是死亡:风险属性框架是否会影响离散选择实验中的决策行为?
Value Health. 2016 Mar-Apr;19(2):202-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.11.004. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
6
Women's preferences for attributes of first-trimester miscarriage management: a stated preference discrete-choice experiment.女性对孕早期流产管理属性的偏好:一项陈述偏好离散选择实验
Value Health. 2009 Jun;12(4):551-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00459.x. Epub 2008 Sep 16.
7
Discrete choice experiment to determine preferences of decision-makers in healthcare for different formats of rapid reviews.离散选择实验以确定医疗保健领域决策者对不同形式快速综述的偏好。
Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 20;10(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01647-z.
8
Mimicking Real-Life Decision Making in Health: Allowing Respondents Time to Think in a Discrete Choice Experiment.模拟健康领域中的真实决策:在离散选择实验中给予受访者思考时间。
Value Health. 2020 Jul;23(7):945-952. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.02.014. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
9
An empirical comparison of methods for analyzing correlated data from a discrete choice survey to elicit patient preference for colorectal cancer screening.分析离散选择调查中相关数据以得出患者对结直肠癌筛查偏好的方法的实证比较。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Feb 20;12:15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-15.
10
The Impact of Reproductive Issues on Preferences of Women with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis for Disease-Modifying Treatments.生殖问题对复发型多发性硬化症女性对疾病修正治疗选择的影响。
Patient. 2020 Oct;13(5):583-597. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00429-4.

引用本文的文献

1
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
2
Exploring the Factors that Drive Clinical Negligence Claims: Stated Preferences of Those Who Have Experienced Unintended Harm.探究引发医疗过失索赔的因素:意外受伤害者的既定偏好
Patient. 2024 May;17(3):301-317. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00674-x. Epub 2024 Feb 1.