• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

执行失败假说解释了动机和思维漫游之间在特质层面上的关联。

Executive failure hypothesis explains the trait-level association between motivation and mind wandering.

机构信息

School of Humanities and Science, Kyushu Campus, Tokai University, Higashi-Ku, Toroku 9-1-1, Kumamoto, 862-8652, Japan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 7;12(1):5839. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09824-3.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-09824-3
PMID:35393489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8990005/
Abstract

Mind wandering (MW) is commonly observable in daily life. Early studies established an association between motivation and MW at the trait level using a questionnaire survey. Considering that the mechanism of state-level association between them is known, this study was conducted to replicate the trait-level association and determine its possible mechanisms. Two independent samples were analysed using several questionnaires, which included motivation and MW. General one- and multi-dimensional scales were administered for both variables. Besides the successful replication of the significant association between motivation and MW at the trait level, we found that people with low levels of executive function experience high rates of spontaneous MW. This finding indicates that the underlying mechanism of trait-level association is the executive failure hypothesis, which postulates that a failure of executive control during task-related objectives evokes MW. Further, the motivation-MW relationship exhibits a different psychological basis at the state and trait levels.

摘要

走神(mind wandering,MW)在日常生活中很常见。早期研究使用问卷调查在特质水平上确立了动机与 MW 之间的联系。考虑到它们之间的状态水平关联机制已被了解,本研究旨在复制特质水平关联,并确定其可能的机制。使用包括动机和 MW 的几种问卷对两个独立的样本进行了分析。针对这两个变量,我们采用了通用的一维和多维量表。除了成功复制特质水平上动机和 MW 之间的显著关联外,我们还发现执行功能水平较低的人会经历更高比例的自发 MW。这一发现表明,特质水平关联的潜在机制是执行失败假说,该假说认为,在与任务相关的目标过程中执行控制的失败会引发 MW。此外,动机-MW 关系在状态和特质水平上表现出不同的心理基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc8/8990005/ab2958836fb3/41598_2022_9824_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc8/8990005/a156a9243236/41598_2022_9824_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc8/8990005/57c59aac2e3b/41598_2022_9824_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc8/8990005/498f67342182/41598_2022_9824_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc8/8990005/ab2958836fb3/41598_2022_9824_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc8/8990005/a156a9243236/41598_2022_9824_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc8/8990005/57c59aac2e3b/41598_2022_9824_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc8/8990005/498f67342182/41598_2022_9824_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc8/8990005/ab2958836fb3/41598_2022_9824_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Executive failure hypothesis explains the trait-level association between motivation and mind wandering.执行失败假说解释了动机和思维漫游之间在特质层面上的关联。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 7;12(1):5839. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09824-3.
2
The association of motivation with mind wandering in trait and state levels.动机与特质和状态水平的心流的关系。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 13;15(8):e0237461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237461. eCollection 2020.
3
Distinguishing spontaneous from deliberate mind wandering in adolescents: The role of attentional control and depressive symptoms.区分青少年自发与故意的思维漫游:注意控制和抑郁症状的作用。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2020 Sep;38(3):434-441. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12325. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
4
Not all mind wandering is created equal: dissociating deliberate from spontaneous mind wandering.并非所有的走神都是一样的:区分刻意走神和自发走神。
Psychol Res. 2015 Sep;79(5):750-8. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0617-x. Epub 2014 Oct 5.
5
Modulation of Mind Wandering Using Monaural Beat Stimulation in Subjects With High Trait-Level Mind Wandering.使用单耳节拍刺激对高特质水平思维游荡受试者的思维游荡进行调节。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 13;13:815442. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815442. eCollection 2022.
6
Cognitive and contextual correlates of spontaneous and deliberate mind-wandering.自发与刻意走神的认知及情境关联因素
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Jan;44(1):85-98. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000444. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
7
Dispositional factors account for age differences in self-reported mind-wandering.性格因素可以解释年龄差异导致的自发思维漫游现象。
Psychol Aging. 2021 Jun;36(4):421-432. doi: 10.1037/pag0000614.
8
Daydreaming style moderates the relation between working memory and mind wandering: Integrating two hypotheses.白日梦风格调节工作记忆与走神之间的关系:整合两种假说。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Mar;42(3):451-464. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000180. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
9
Cognitive aging and the distinction between intentional and unintentional mind wandering.认知衰老以及有意与无意走神之间的区别。
Psychol Aging. 2017 Jun;32(4):315-324. doi: 10.1037/pag0000172. Epub 2017 May 4.
10
Functional connectivity within and between intrinsic brain networks correlates with trait mind wandering.内在脑网络内部及之间的功能连接与特质性思维游荡相关。
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Aug;103:140-153. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Jul 10.

引用本文的文献

1
The Relative Accuracy of Different Methods for Measuring Mind Wandering Subtypes: A Systematic Review.测量思维游荡亚型的不同方法的相对准确性:一项系统综述。
Brain Behav. 2025 Aug;15(8):e70764. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70764.
2
Mind Wandering during Implicit Learning Is Associated with Increased Periodic EEG Activity and Improved Extraction of Hidden Probabilistic Patterns.内隐学习过程中的思维游荡与脑电图周期性活动增加及隐藏概率模式提取改善有关。
J Neurosci. 2025 May 7;45(19):e1421242025. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1421-24.2025.

本文引用的文献

1
The association of motivation with mind wandering in trait and state levels.动机与特质和状态水平的心流的关系。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 13;15(8):e0237461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237461. eCollection 2020.
2
Developing and validating the Japanese version of Dimensional Apathy Scale (J-DAS).开发并验证日语版的维度性冷漠量表(J-DAS)。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2020 Jul;74(7):411-412. doi: 10.1111/pcn.13009. Epub 2020 May 7.
3
Questionnaires and task-based measures assess different aspects of self-regulation: Both are needed.
问卷调查和基于任务的测评方法评估自我调节的不同方面:两者都不可或缺。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Dec 3;116(49):24396-24397. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1915315116. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
4
Increasing participant motivation reduces rates of intentional and unintentional mind wandering.提高参与者的积极性可以降低有意和无意思维漫游的发生率。
Psychol Res. 2019 Jul;83(5):1057-1069. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0914-2. Epub 2017 Sep 16.
5
Cognitive and contextual correlates of spontaneous and deliberate mind-wandering.自发与刻意走神的认知及情境关联因素
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Jan;44(1):85-98. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000444. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
6
Distinct Subtypes of Apathy Revealed by the Apathy Motivation Index.冷漠动机指数揭示的冷漠的不同亚型。
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 11;12(1):e0169938. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169938. eCollection 2017.
7
Mind-Wandering With and Without Intention.有意与无意的走神。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Aug;20(8):605-617. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
8
[Development of Japanese versions of the Daydream Frequency Scale and the Mind Wandering Questionnaire].[白日梦频率量表和思维游荡问卷日语版本的编制]
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2016 Apr;87(1):79-88. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.87.14223.
9
On the Necessity of Distinguishing Between Unintentional and Intentional Mind Wandering.有必要区分非故意和故意的思维漫游。
Psychol Sci. 2016 May;27(5):685-91. doi: 10.1177/0956797616634068. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
10
Assessing the associations among trait and state levels of deliberate and spontaneous mind wandering.评估特质性和状态性的刻意与自发思维游荡水平之间的关联。
Conscious Cogn. 2016 Apr;41:50-6. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Feb 11.