Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 Nov 2;61(11):4245-4251. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac228.
Clinical joint examination is the cornerstone for evaluation of patients with RA. However, since large discrepancies have been shown even between experienced rheumatologists in evaluation of joint inflammation, and tender joints may have limited value in reflecting inflammation, US has in recent decades been introduced in the clinical assessments of RA patients. US has high accordance with other imaging modalities and enables detection of clinically difficult pathologies and contributes to assessments of joints difficult to evaluate clinically. However, there is no general agreement on the optimal use of US in rheumatology, and the prevalence of machines as well as the level of experience differs greatly between countries. In addition, standardized use of US in treat-to-target follow-up of RA patients was found not to have any added value. Thus, how to use US in monitoring of RA patients is open for debate. The present article will discuss the pros and cons for using US in the clinical setting.
临床关节检查是评估 RA 患者的基石。然而,即使在经验丰富的风湿病学家之间,关节炎症的评估也存在很大差异,并且压痛关节在反映炎症方面可能具有有限的价值,因此,超声检查在近几十年来已被引入 RA 患者的临床评估中。超声检查与其他影像学检查具有高度一致性,并能够检测到临床上难以处理的病理变化,有助于评估临床上难以评估的关节。然而,在风湿病学中使用超声检查的最佳方法尚未达成共识,机器的普及程度以及经验水平在各国之间存在很大差异。此外,在 RA 患者的达标治疗随访中,并未发现使用超声检查有任何附加价值。因此,如何在 RA 患者的监测中使用超声检查仍存在争议。本文将讨论在临床环境中使用超声检查的优缺点。