• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过基于电子健康记录的问卷识别残疾患者的无障碍需求。

Identifying Accessibility Requests for Patients With Disabilities Through an Electronic Health Record-Based Questionnaire.

机构信息

Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Johns Hopkins Disability Health Research Center, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e226555. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.6555.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.6555
PMID:35394512
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8994132/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

People with disabilities experience disparities in health care access and outcomes, and inaccessible health care facilities are major barriers to health care access. Methods to collect accessibility request information are needed to improve health care outcomes for patients with disabilities.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate an electronic health record (EHR)-based questionnaire designed to identify accessibility requests for patients with disabilities at an eye clinic.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional pilot study implemented an EHR questionnaire and prospectively collected data on accessibility requests at a university-based eye clinic. The study included 55 722 patients making appointments at the Johns Hopkins Wilmer Eye Institute from April 1, 2019, to March 31, 2020.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The Wilmer Eye Institute staff were trained to assess accessibility requests of patients making appointments in-person or via telephone using a standardized script and entering patient responses into the EHR. Data were later extracted for analysis and used to determine the proportion of patients making eye appointments who reported a disability accessibility request (physical, sensory, or intellectual) during their clinic visit.

RESULTS

Accessibility request data were collected from 250 932 patient encounters. Patients had a mean (SD) age of 61.9 (20.6) years; most were women (146 846 [58.5%]) and were White individuals (162 720 [64.9%]). Of these, 23 510 (9.4%) encounters were associated with an accessibility request. The most reported accessibility request was mobility related (18 857 [7.5%]) (needing a cane, crutches, motorized scooter, walker, wheelchair, stretcher, assistance standing, or transport services), followed by sensory-related (2988 [1.2%]) (visual, hearing, or speech impairment), intellectual (353 [0.1%]), and other (1312 [0.5%]) (assistance with filling forms or service animal) requests. Patients with an accessibility request compared with those without, were older (72.6 vs 60.8 years), less likely to be White individuals (59.7% vs 65.4%), and more likely to be women (62.6% vs 58.1%), receiving Medicare (69.6% vs 41.5%), and have vision impairment (41.3% vs 13.6%) (P < .001 for all).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cross-sectional study, a substantial proportion of patients making eye appointments reported having accessibility requests as captured using a new EHR-based questionnaire. Such standardization of data collection for disability-related accessibility requests in EHR is scalable, could be expanded to other clinical settings, and has the potential to improve accessibility of health care interactions for patients with disabilities.

摘要

重要性

残疾人在获得医疗保健方面存在差异,而无法获得医疗保健设施是获得医疗保健的主要障碍。需要收集可及性请求信息的方法来改善残疾患者的医疗保健结果。

目的

评估一种基于电子健康记录 (EHR) 的问卷,旨在确定眼科诊所中残疾患者的可及性请求。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项在大学眼科诊所实施的基于 EHR 的问卷调查的横断面试点研究,前瞻性地收集了可及性请求数据。该研究纳入了 2019 年 4 月 1 日至 2020 年 3 月 31 日期间在约翰霍普金斯威尔默眼科研究所预约的 55722 名患者。

主要结果和措施

威尔默眼科研究所的工作人员接受了培训,以使用标准化脚本评估亲自或通过电话预约的患者的可及性请求,并将患者的回答输入 EHR。后来提取数据进行分析,以确定报告在就诊期间有残疾可及性请求(身体、感官或智力)的预约眼科患者的比例。

结果

从 250932 次患者就诊中收集了可及性请求数据。患者的平均(标准差)年龄为 61.9(20.6)岁;大多数是女性(146846 [58.5%])和白人(162720 [64.9%])。其中,23510 次就诊与可及性请求有关。报告最多的可及性请求与行动能力有关(18857 [7.5%])(需要拐杖、拐杖、机动滑板车、助行器、轮椅、担架、协助站立或运输服务),其次是感官相关(2988 [1.2%])(视力、听力或言语障碍),智力(353 [0.1%])和其他(1312 [0.5%])(协助填写表格或服务性动物)请求。与没有可及性请求的患者相比,有可及性请求的患者年龄更大(72.6 岁比 60.8 岁),白人的比例更低(59.7%比 65.4%),女性的比例更高(62.6%比 58.1%),更多的人获得医疗保险(69.6%比 41.5%),并且有视力障碍(41.3%比 13.6%)(所有 P<0.001)。

结论和相关性

在这项横断面研究中,相当一部分预约眼科就诊的患者报告了使用新的基于 EHR 的问卷获得了可及性请求。这种对 EHR 中与残疾相关的可及性请求数据的标准化收集是可扩展的,可以扩展到其他临床环境,并有可能改善残疾患者的医疗保健互动的可及性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d86/8994132/33804b7d7ed1/jamanetwopen-e226555-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d86/8994132/33804b7d7ed1/jamanetwopen-e226555-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d86/8994132/33804b7d7ed1/jamanetwopen-e226555-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Identifying Accessibility Requests for Patients With Disabilities Through an Electronic Health Record-Based Questionnaire.通过基于电子健康记录的问卷识别残疾患者的无障碍需求。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e226555. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.6555.
2
Access to Reproductive Health Services Among People With Disabilities.残疾人获得生殖健康服务的情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2344877. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.44877.
3
Cost and Visit Duration of Same-Day Access at an Academic Ophthalmology Department vs Emergency Department.眼科日间手术与急诊就诊的成本和就诊时间比较。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Jul 1;137(7):729-735. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.0864.
4
A study of user requests regarding the fully electronic health record system at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital: challenges for future electronic health record systems.一项关于首尔国立大学盆唐医院全电子健康记录系统用户请求的研究:对未来电子健康记录系统的挑战。
Int J Med Inform. 2013 May;82(5):387-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.08.004. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
5
Accessibility and accommodations for patients with mobility disabilities in a large healthcare system: How are we doing?大型医疗体系中行动障碍患者的无障碍通道和便利设施:我们做得如何?
Disabil Health J. 2019 Oct;12(4):679-684. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2019.03.008. Epub 2019 Mar 23.
6
Patient and Visit Characteristics Associated With Use of Direct Scheduling in Primary Care Practices.患者和就诊特征与初级保健实践中直接预约的使用相关。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e209637. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9637.
7
Self-Reported Accommodation Needs for Patients with Disabilities in Primary Care.基层医疗中残疾患者自我报告的住宿需求
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2024 Jan;50(1):59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2023.10.012. Epub 2023 Oct 29.
8
Impact of Social Determinants of Health and Demographics on Refill Requests by Medicare Patients Using a Conversational Artificial Intelligence Text Messaging Solution: Cross-Sectional Study.利用对话式人工智能短信解决方案评估健康社会决定因素和人口统计学对医疗保险患者续药请求的影响:横断面研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Nov 18;7(11):e15771. doi: 10.2196/15771.
9
Requirements and access needs of patients with chronic disease to their hospital electronic health record: results of a cross-sectional questionnaire survey.慢性病患者对医院电子健康记录的需求及获取需求:横断面问卷调查结果
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 14;6(10):e012257. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012257.
10
Accessibility information in New Delhi for "EaseAccess" Android-based app for persons with disability: an observational study.针对残疾人士的基于安卓系统的“轻松访问”应用程序在新德里的可访问性信息:一项观察性研究。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019 Oct;14(7):645-662. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1471743. Epub 2018 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Disability disclosure in healthcare settings for individuals with developmental disabilities: A qualitative study of patient and caregiver perspectives.发育障碍患者在医疗环境中的残疾状况披露:一项关于患者及照顾者观点的定性研究
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 7;20(8):e0329328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329328. eCollection 2025.
2
A Scoping Review of the Evidence on Disability Accommodations Targeting Equitable Communication Access in Health Care.一项针对医疗保健中公平沟通无障碍的残疾便利措施证据的范围综述。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2025 May 6;34(3):1493-1527. doi: 10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00234. Epub 2025 Apr 29.
3
Freeman Center for intellectual and developmental disabilities: Patient-centered interdisciplinary care.

本文引用的文献

1
Preventive Care Utilization among Adults with Hearing Loss in the United States.美国听力损失成年人的预防性保健利用情况
Semin Hear. 2021 Feb;42(1):37-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1725999. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
2
Association of Vision Impairment With Preventive Care Use Among Older Adults in the United States.美国老年人视力障碍与预防保健利用的关联。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec 1;138(12):1298-1306. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.4524.
3
Trends in Employment by Dual Sensory Impairment Status.就业趋势按双重感觉障碍状况划分。
弗里曼智力与发育障碍中心:以患者为中心的跨学科护理。
Health Care Transit. 2023 May 22;1:100003. doi: 10.1016/j.hctj.2023.100003. eCollection 2023.
4
Telehealth and digital health innovations: A mixed landscape of access.远程医疗与数字健康创新:接入情况参差不齐的局面。
PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Dec 15;2(12):e0000401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000401. eCollection 2023 Dec.
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020 Feb 1;138(2):213-215. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.4955.
4
Adults with Communication Disabilities Experience Poorer Health and Healthcare Outcomes Compared to Persons Without Communication Disabilities.与无交流障碍的人相比,有交流障碍的成年人在健康和医疗保健方面的结果更差。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Dec;33(12):2147-2155. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4625-1. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
5
"Special needs" is an ineffective euphemism.“特殊需求”是一个无效的委婉说法。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2016;1(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s41235-016-0025-4. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
6
Eliminating health and health care disparities among the growing population of people with disabilities.消除日益增长的残疾人群体在健康和医疗保健方面的差距。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Oct;30(10):1947-54. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0613.
7
Achieving accessible health care for people with disabilities: why the ADA is only part of the solution.为残疾人提供可及的医疗保健:为什么 ADA 只是解决方案的一部分。
Disabil Health J. 2010 Oct;3(4):253-61. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2010.07.006.
8
Health care under the ADA: a vision or a mirage?《ADA 下的医疗保健:是幻想还是幻影?》
Disabil Health J. 2010 Oct;3(4):233-9. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2010.07.002.
9
Has the ADA improved the health of people with disabilities?《美国残疾人法案》是否改善了残疾人的健康状况?
Disabil Health J. 2010 Oct;3(4):225-6. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2010.07.007.
10
Physical access barriers to care for diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer among women with mobility impairments.行动不便的女性在乳腺癌诊断和治疗方面面临的就医身体障碍。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2010 Nov;37(6):711-7. doi: 10.1188/10.ONF.711-717.