Energy and Environment Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, United States.
National Security Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, United States.
Forensic Sci Int. 2022 May;334:111244. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111244. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
Estimates suggest billions of dollars are lost annually in the US due to fuel tax fraud. One method of fuel fraud is called "cocktailing" and involves blending products that are non-taxed, lower value, taxed at a lower rate, or unwanted/less-refined petroleum to diesel fuels. The goal of this study was to investigate compound specific isotope analysis (CSIA) using isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) for small aromatics contained in diesel fuel to determine whether this approach could be used to identify cocktailing and potentially fingerprint possible sources. However, the high chemical complexity of diesel fuels complicates CSIA owing to the need to fully separate individual compounds for effective isotope analysis. Therefore, different methods were investigated to selectively isolate aromatics for CSIA and evaluate these methods for isotopic fractionation. Analyses indicate that there is enough variability in isotopic ratios (δH and δC) between toluene samples obtained from different sources to use CSIA to differentiate/identify the origin of potential fuel adulterants. Three isolation methods were identified that provided sufficiently pure aromatic fractions for CSIA: selective solvent extraction, ionic liquid coated solid phase microextraction (SPME), and a combination of the two. However, due to the labor-intensive nature of selective solvent extraction, ionic liquid coated SPME represents the best method to quickly isolate aromatics from diesel fuel, without sacrificing selectivity or sensitivity. All methods tested can result in isotopic fractionation, but this can be compensated for by applying a correction factor. Furthermore, the chemical composition of a sample appeared to be important in the degree to which fractionation occurred during isolation. While the tested approaches for aromatic extraction from diesel showed promise, additional studies are required to refine and validate the methods prior to routine use in fuel cocktailing investigations.
据估计,由于燃料税欺诈,美国每年损失数十亿美元。燃料欺诈的一种方法称为“鸡尾酒”,涉及混合非征税、低价值、低税率征税或不需要/低精炼的石油与柴油燃料。本研究的目的是调查使用同位素比质谱 (IRMS) 对柴油燃料中所含的小芳烃进行化合物特定同位素分析 (CSIA),以确定这种方法是否可用于识别鸡尾酒,并可能识别潜在的来源。然而,由于需要完全分离单个化合物以进行有效的同位素分析,因此柴油燃料的高化学复杂性使 CSIA 变得复杂。因此,研究了不同的方法来选择性地分离芳烃进行 CSIA,并评估这些方法的同位素分馏。分析表明,从不同来源获得的甲苯样品之间的同位素比值 (δH 和 δC) 存在足够的可变性,可以使用 CSIA 来区分/识别潜在燃料掺杂物的来源。确定了三种可以为 CSIA 提供足够纯芳烃馏分的分离方法:选择性溶剂萃取、离子液体涂覆固相微萃取 (SPME) 和两者的组合。然而,由于选择性溶剂萃取的劳动强度大,离子液体涂覆的 SPME 代表了从柴油燃料中快速分离芳烃的最佳方法,而不会牺牲选择性或灵敏度。所有测试的方法都可能导致同位素分馏,但可以通过应用校正因子来补偿。此外,样品的化学成分对于在分离过程中发生分馏的程度似乎很重要。虽然从柴油中提取芳烃的测试方法显示出了前景,但在常规用于燃料鸡尾酒调查之前,还需要进一步研究来改进和验证这些方法。