• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

几何元优化。

Geometry meta-optimization.

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California 94132, USA.

Department of Chemistry, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts 02467, USA.

出版信息

J Chem Phys. 2022 Apr 7;156(13):134109. doi: 10.1063/5.0087165.

DOI:10.1063/5.0087165
PMID:35395877
Abstract

Recent work has demonstrated the promise of using machine-learned surrogates, in particular, Gaussian process (GP) surrogates, in reducing the number of electronic structure calculations (ESCs) needed to perform surrogate model based (SMB) geometry optimization. In this paper, we study geometry meta-optimization with GP surrogates where a SMB optimizer additionally learns from its past "experience" performing geometry optimization. To validate this idea, we start with the simplest setting where a geometry meta-optimizer learns from previous optimizations of the same molecule with different initial-guess geometries. We give empirical evidence that geometry meta-optimization with GP surrogates is effective and requires less tuning compared to SMB optimization with GP surrogates on the ANI-1 dataset of off-equilibrium initial structures of small organic molecules. Unlike SMB optimization where a surrogate should be immediately useful for optimizing a given geometry, a surrogate in geometry meta-optimization has more flexibility because it can distribute its ESC savings across a set of geometries. Indeed, we find that GP surrogates that preserve rotational invariance provide increased marginal ESC savings across geometries. As a more stringent test, we also apply geometry meta-optimization to conformational search on a hand-constructed dataset of hydrocarbons and alcohols. We observe that while SMB optimization and geometry meta-optimization do save on ESCs, they also tend to miss higher energy conformers compared to standard geometry optimization. We believe that further research into characterizing the divergence between GP surrogates and potential energy surfaces is critical not only for advancing geometry meta-optimization but also for exploring the potential of machine-learned surrogates in geometry optimization in general.

摘要

最近的工作表明,使用机器学习代理(尤其是高斯过程 (GP) 代理)可以减少进行基于代理模型的 (SMB) 几何优化所需的电子结构计算 (ESC) 的数量。在本文中,我们研究了基于 GP 代理的几何元优化,其中 SMB 优化器还可以从其过去执行几何优化的“经验”中学习。为了验证这一想法,我们从最简单的设置开始,其中几何元优化器从具有不同初始猜测几何形状的同一分子的先前优化中学习。我们提供了经验证据,表明与基于 ANI-1 数据集的非平衡小分子初始结构的 GP 代理 SMB 优化相比,基于 GP 代理的几何元优化是有效的,并且需要更少的调整。与 SMB 优化不同,代理在优化给定几何形状时应该立即有用,而在几何元优化中,代理具有更多的灵活性,因为它可以将其 ESC 节省分配到一组几何形状上。事实上,我们发现保留旋转不变性的 GP 代理在几何形状上提供了更高的边际 ESC 节省。作为更严格的测试,我们还将几何元优化应用于手动构建的烃和醇数据集上的构象搜索。我们观察到,虽然 SMB 优化和几何元优化确实可以节省 ESC,但与标准几何优化相比,它们也容易错过更高能量的构象。我们认为,进一步研究 GP 代理和势能面之间的差异不仅对于推进几何元优化至关重要,而且对于探索机器学习代理在一般几何优化中的潜力也至关重要。

相似文献

1
Geometry meta-optimization.几何元优化。
J Chem Phys. 2022 Apr 7;156(13):134109. doi: 10.1063/5.0087165.
2
Dual-Level Training of Gaussian Processes with Physically Inspired Priors for Geometry Optimizations.基于物理启发先验的高斯过程双层训练及其在几何优化中的应用。
J Chem Theory Comput. 2022 Sep 13;18(9):5739-5754. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00546. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
3
Exploring torsional conformer space with physical prior mean function-driven meta-Gaussian processes.利用物理先验均值函数驱动的元高斯过程探索扭转构象空间。
J Chem Phys. 2023 Dec 7;159(21). doi: 10.1063/5.0176709.
4
Development and Evaluation of Geometry Optimization Algorithms in Conjunction with ANI Potentials.发展和评估与ANI 势能相结合的几何优化算法。
J Chem Theory Comput. 2022 Feb 8;18(2):978-991. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c01043. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
5
Geometry Optimization: A Comparison of Different Open-Source Geometry Optimizers.几何优化:不同开源几何优化器的比较
J Chem Theory Comput. 2023 Nov 14;19(21):7533-7541. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00188. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
6
Efficient Geometry Minimization and Transition Structure Optimization Using Interpolated Potential Energy Surfaces and Iteratively Updated Hessians.使用插值势能面和迭代更新海森矩阵进行高效几何最小化和过渡结构优化。
J Chem Theory Comput. 2017 Dec 12;13(12):6424-6432. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00719. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
7
A review of naturalistic driving study surrogates and surrogate indicator viability within the context of different road geometries.综述自然驾驶研究替代指标和替代指标在不同道路几何条件下的可行性。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Jul;157:106185. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106185. Epub 2021 May 18.
8
Transition state search and geometry relaxation throughout chemical compound space with quantum machine learning.利用量子机器学习在整个化合物空间中进行过渡态搜索和几何结构弛豫。
J Chem Phys. 2022 Dec 14;157(22):221102. doi: 10.1063/5.0112856.
9
BAND NN: A Deep Learning Framework for Energy Prediction and Geometry Optimization of Organic Small Molecules.BAND NN:用于有机小分子能量预测和几何结构优化的深度学习框架。
J Comput Chem. 2020 Mar 30;41(8):790-799. doi: 10.1002/jcc.26128. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
10
SENSAAS-Flex: a joint optimization approach for aligning 3D shapes and exploring the molecular conformation space.SENSAAS-Flex:一种联合优化方法,用于对齐 3D 形状并探索分子构象空间。
Bioinformatics. 2024 Mar 4;40(3). doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae105.