Suppr超能文献

新辅助化疗对即刻乳房重建术后安全性结局的影响。

The Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Safety Outcomes Following Immediate Breast Reconstruction.

作者信息

Grigor Emma J M, Stein Michael J, Arnaout Angel, Ghaedi Bahareh, Ramsay Tim, Zhang Jing

机构信息

Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ontario, Ottawa, Canada.

Department of Plastic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, United States; Department of Surgery, Division of Plastics and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ontario, Ottawa, Canada.

出版信息

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022 Aug;75(8):2520-2525. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.02.048. Epub 2022 Mar 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction (MIBR) are becoming an increasingly popular option for women with breast cancer. However, MIBR is associated with a higher risk of postoperative complications compared to mastectomy alone, which may delay adjuvant cancer therapy. The main objective of this retrospective cohort study was to investigate oncologic outcomes in MIBR patients with and without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

METHODS

A 6-year retrospective study of breast cancer patients treated with MIBR was conducted from January 2013 to May 2019. The primary outcome was a delay in adjuvant radiochemotherapy. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications and locoregional recurrences.

RESULTS

Of 1832 patients reviewed, 300 (7.1%) were included. The cohort consisted of 277 (92%) MIBR patients without NACT and 23 (7.7%) with NACT. There was significantly more N1 and N2 tumor node status in the non-NACT group compared to the NACT group (p<0.001). The overall complication rates were similar in the NACT group compared to non-NACT (37.5% versus 21.7%, p=0.148). The rates of major and minor complications were also similar between NACT and non-NACT groups (Major: 29.6% versus 21.7%, p=0.823) and (Minor: 26.7% versus 8.70%, p =0.0970). The rates of locoregional recurrence (p=1.00), time to adjuvant therapy (p=0.629), and rates of delay (p=0.305) was also similar between groups. Overall survival was significantly lower in the NACT group compared to non-NACT (98.2% versus 82.6%, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference in complication rates, or timing to adjuvant therapy, among MIBR patients with and without NACT. However, MIBR patients who received NACT had worse overall survival than MIBR patients without NACT.

摘要

背景

乳房切除术和即刻乳房重建术(MIBR)正成为乳腺癌女性越来越受欢迎的选择。然而,与单纯乳房切除术相比,MIBR术后并发症风险更高,这可能会延迟辅助性癌症治疗。这项回顾性队列研究的主要目的是调查接受和未接受新辅助化疗(NACT)的MIBR患者的肿瘤学结局。

方法

对2013年1月至2019年5月接受MIBR治疗的乳腺癌患者进行了一项为期6年的回顾性研究。主要结局是辅助放化疗延迟。次要结局包括术后并发症和局部区域复发。

结果

在1832例接受评估的患者中,300例(7.1%)被纳入研究。该队列包括277例(92%)未接受NACT的MIBR患者和23例(7.7%)接受NACT的患者。与NACT组相比,非NACT组中N1和N2肿瘤淋巴结状态明显更多(p<0.001)。NACT组与非NACT组的总体并发症发生率相似(37.5%对21.7%,p=0.1'48)。NACT组和非NACT组的主要和次要并发症发生率也相似(主要并发症:29.6%对21.7%,p=0.823)以及(次要并发症:26.7%对8.70%,p=0.0970)。两组之间的局部区域复发率(p=1.00)、辅助治疗时间(p=0.629)和延迟率(p=0.305)也相似。NACT组的总生存率明显低于非NACT组(98.2%对82.6%,p<0.001)。

结论

接受和未接受NACT的MIBR患者在并发症发生率或辅助治疗时机方面没有差异。然而,接受NACT的MIBR患者的总生存率比未接受NACT的MIBR患者更差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验