新辅助化疗后接受乳房切除术患者的胸前区与胸肌下即刻乳房重建:我们的早期经验

Prepectoral vs. Submuscular Immediate Breast Reconstruction in Patients Undergoing Mastectomy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Our Early Experience.

作者信息

Scardina Lorenzo, Di Leone Alba, Biondi Ersilia, Carnassale Beatrice, Sanchez Alejandro Martin, D'Archi Sabatino, Franco Antonio, Moschella Francesca, Magno Stefano, Terribile Daniela, Gentile Damiano, Fabi Alessandra, D'Angelo Anna, Barone Adesi Liliana, Visconti Giuseppe, Salgarello Marzia, Masetti Riccardo, Franceschini Gianluca

机构信息

Breast Unit, Department of Women, Children and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.

Multidisciplinary Breast Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2022 Sep 19;12(9):1533. doi: 10.3390/jpm12091533.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Conservative mastectomy with immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction (IPBR) is an oncologically accepted technique that offers improved esthetic results and patient quality of life. Traditionally, implants have been placed in a submuscular (SM) plane beneath the pectoralis major muscle (PMM). Recently, prepectoral (PP) placement of the prosthesis has been increasingly used in order to avoid morbidities related to manipulation of the PMM. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of SM vs. PP IPBR after conservative mastectomy in patients with histologically proven breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

METHODS

In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed two cohorts of patients that underwent mastectomy with IPBR after NAC in our institution from January 2018 to December 2021. Conservative mastectomy was performed in 146 of the 400 patients that underwent NAC during the study period. Patients were divided into two groups based on the positioning of implants: 56 SM versus 90 PP.

RESULTS

The two cohorts were similar for age (mean age 42 and 44 years in the SM and PP group respectively) and follow-up (33 and 20 months, respectively). Mean operative time was 56 min shorter in the PP group (300 and 244 min in the SM and PP group). No significant differences were observed in overall major complication rates. Implant loss was observed in 1.78% of patients (1/56) in the SM group and 1.11% of patients (1/90) in PP group. No differences were observed between the two groups in local or regional recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary experience, which represents one of the largest series of patients undergoing PP-IPBR after NAC at a single institution documented in the literature, seems to confirm that PP-IPBR after NAC is a safe, reliable and effective alternative to traditional SM-IPBR with excellent esthetic and oncological outcomes; it is easy to perform, reduces operative time and minimizes complications related to manipulation of PPM. However, this promising results need to be confirmed in prospective trials with longer follow-up.

摘要

背景

保留乳房的乳房切除术联合即刻假体乳房重建术(IPBR)是一种在肿瘤学上被认可的技术,能带来更好的美学效果和患者生活质量。传统上,植入物被放置在胸大肌(PMM)下方的肌下(SM)平面。最近,为了避免与胸大肌操作相关的并发症,越来越多地采用胸前(PP)放置假体的方法。本研究的目的是比较新辅助化疗(NAC)治疗的组织学确诊乳腺癌患者在保留乳房的乳房切除术后SM与PP IPBR的效果。

方法

在这项回顾性观察研究中,我们分析了2018年1月至2021年12月在我们机构接受NAC后行IPBR乳房切除术的两组患者。在研究期间接受NAC的400例患者中,146例行保留乳房的乳房切除术。根据植入物的位置将患者分为两组:56例SM组和90例PP组。

结果

两组在年龄(SM组和PP组平均年龄分别为42岁和44岁)和随访时间(分别为33个月和20个月)方面相似。PP组的平均手术时间短56分钟(SM组和PP组分别为300分钟和244分钟)。总体主要并发症发生率无显著差异。SM组1.78%的患者(1/56)和PP组1.11%的患者(1/90)出现植入物丢失。两组在局部或区域复发方面无差异。

结论

我们的初步经验代表了文献中记载的单机构最大系列NAC后接受PP-IPBR的患者之一,似乎证实NAC后的PP-IPBR是传统SM-IPBR的一种安全、可靠且有效的替代方法,具有出色的美学和肿瘤学效果;它操作简便,减少手术时间,并将与胸大肌操作相关的并发症降至最低。然而,这一有前景的结果需要在更长随访期的前瞻性试验中得到证实。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5e2/9504024/9314cd48d845/jpm-12-01533-g001.jpg

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索