The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fujian Province, P. R. China.
Shenzhen Hospital, Peking University, Guangdong Province, P. R. China.
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Oct;78(10):3261-3272. doi: 10.1111/jan.15250. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
To examine the differences in decisional conflict, decision regret, self-stigma and quality of life among breast cancer survivors who chose different surgeries, as well as the effects of decisional conflict, decision regret and self-stigma on quality of life.
Observational study.
Paper and online surveys were used to collect data from March to September 2020. The Chinese version of the Decisional Conflict Scale, Decision Regret Scale, Self-Stigma Form and Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-B were used to measure the corresponding health outcomes for breast cancer survivors who chose different surgeries from three university-affiliated hospitals. One-way analysis of variance, Pearson's correlation coefficient and hierarchical multiple regression analysis were used for data analysis.
Among the 448 participants, only 21% chose breast conservative surgery, while 79% chose mastectomy with or without reconstruction. Women who chose mastectomy with reconstruction reported higher decisional conflict (p = .028) and more decision regret (p = .013) than women who chose breast conservative surgery; women who chose mastectomy without reconstruction indicated higher decisional conflict (p = .015), more decision regret (p < .001), and higher self-stigma (p = .034) than women who chose breast conservative surgery. Decisional conflict (r = -.430), decision regret (r = -.495), and self-stigma (r = -.561) were negatively correlated with quality of life. After controlling for sociodemographic and clinical variables, decisional conflict and decision regret explained 19.7% and self-stigma explained 12.9% of the variance in quality of life.
Decisional conflict, decision regret and self-stigma vary according to different breast surgeries and are greatly associated with the quality of life of breast cancer survivors.
Future studies are warranted to investigate the decision-making process and the underlying reasons for surgical choices. Decision support strategies pre-surgery are needed to inform women about the risks and benefits of surgery options. Moreover, psychosocial support post-surgery is warranted to relieve women's self-stigma, thus improving their quality of life.
探讨不同手术方式选择的乳腺癌幸存者在决策冲突、决策后悔、自我污名和生活质量方面的差异,以及决策冲突、决策后悔和自我污名对生活质量的影响。
观察性研究。
2020 年 3 月至 9 月,采用纸质和在线问卷收集三所大学附属医院不同手术方式选择的乳腺癌幸存者的相关数据。采用中文版决策冲突量表、决策后悔量表、自我污名量表和癌症治疗功能评估-乳腺癌量表测量相应的健康结果。采用单因素方差分析、皮尔逊相关系数和分层多元回归分析进行数据分析。
在 448 名参与者中,只有 21%选择保乳手术,而 79%选择乳房切除术加或不加重建。选择乳房再造术的女性报告的决策冲突(p=0.028)和决策后悔(p=0.013)高于选择保乳手术的女性;选择乳房切除术无重建的女性报告的决策冲突(p=0.015)、决策后悔(p<0.001)和自我污名(p=0.034)均高于选择保乳手术的女性。决策冲突(r=-0.430)、决策后悔(r=-0.495)和自我污名(r=-0.561)与生活质量呈负相关。控制社会人口学和临床变量后,决策冲突和决策后悔解释了生活质量的 19.7%,自我污名解释了 12.9%。
不同的乳房手术方式导致决策冲突、决策后悔和自我污名的变化,并与乳腺癌幸存者的生活质量密切相关。
未来的研究需要调查决策过程和手术选择的潜在原因。术前需要决策支持策略,让女性了解手术选择的风险和益处。此外,术后需要提供社会心理支持,以减轻女性的自我污名,从而提高她们的生活质量。