• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良 N 评分有助于识别那些黑便但无呕血的患者中需要内镜干预的患者。

Modified N score is helpful for identifying patients who need endoscopic intervention among those with black stools without hematemesis.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan.

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan.

出版信息

Dig Endosc. 2022 Sep;34(6):1157-1165. doi: 10.1111/den.14323. Epub 2022 May 24.

DOI:10.1111/den.14323
PMID:35396885
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Although black stools are one of the signs of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, not all patients without hematemesis need endoscopic intervention. There is no apparent indicator to select who needs treatment thus far. The aim of this study was to establish a novel score that predicts the need for endoscopic intervention in patients with black stools without hematemesis.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 721 consecutive patients with black stools without hematemesis who underwent emergency endoscopy from two facilities. In the development stage (from January 2016 to December 2018), risk factors that predict the need for endoscopic intervention were determined from the data of 422 patients by multivariate logistic regression analysis, and a novel scoring system, named the modified Nagoya University score (modified N score), was developed. In the validation stage (from January 2019 to September 2020), we evaluated the diagnostic value of the modified N score for 299 patients.

RESULTS

Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed four predictive factors for endoscopic intervention: syncope, the blood urea nitrogen (BUN) level, and the BUN/creatinine ratio as positive indicators and anticoagulant drug use as a negative indicator. In the validation stage, the area under the curve of the modified N score was 0.731, and the modified N score showed a sensitivity of 82.0% and a specificity of 58.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our modified N score, which consists of only four factors, can identify patients who need endoscopic intervention among those with black stools without hematemesis.

摘要

目的

尽管黑便(柏油便)是上消化道出血的征象之一,但并非所有无呕血的患者都需要内镜干预。目前尚无明显指标来选择需要治疗的患者。本研究旨在建立一种新的评分系统,以预测无呕血黑便患者内镜干预的需求。

方法

我们回顾性纳入了来自两家医疗机构的 721 例因黑便而接受急诊内镜检查的连续患者。在开发阶段(2016 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月),我们通过多变量逻辑回归分析确定了 422 例患者中预测内镜干预需求的危险因素,并建立了一种新的评分系统,命名为改良名古屋大学评分(改良 N 评分)。在验证阶段(2019 年 1 月至 2020 年 9 月),我们评估了改良 N 评分对 299 例患者的诊断价值。

结果

多变量逻辑回归分析显示,内镜干预的四个预测因素为:晕厥、血尿素氮(BUN)水平、BUN/肌酐比值(BUN/Cr)和抗凝药物使用(阳性指标)以及抗凝药物使用(阴性指标)。在验证阶段,改良 N 评分的曲线下面积为 0.731,改良 N 评分的灵敏度为 82.0%,特异度为 58.8%。

结论

我们的改良 N 评分仅包含四个因素,可识别无呕血黑便患者中需要内镜干预的患者。

相似文献

1
Modified N score is helpful for identifying patients who need endoscopic intervention among those with black stools without hematemesis.改良 N 评分有助于识别那些黑便但无呕血的患者中需要内镜干预的患者。
Dig Endosc. 2022 Sep;34(6):1157-1165. doi: 10.1111/den.14323. Epub 2022 May 24.
2
A novel scoring system to predict therapeutic intervention for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.一种预测非静脉曲张性上消化道出血治疗干预的新评分系统。
Intern Emerg Med. 2022 Mar;17(2):423-430. doi: 10.1007/s11739-021-02822-9. Epub 2021 Aug 7.
3
Prediction of the need for emergency endoscopic treatment for upper gastrointestinal bleeding and new score model: a retrospective study.预测上消化道出血需要紧急内镜治疗的新评分模型:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Jul 11;22(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02413-8.
4
Three Simple Parameters on Admission to the Emergency Department are Predictors for Endoscopic Intervention in Patients with Suspected Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.急诊入院时的三个简单参数可预测疑似非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者的内镜介入治疗。
J Emerg Med. 2024 Feb;66(2):64-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2023.08.016. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
5
Can pre-endoscopic assessment predict active upper gastrointestinal bleeding? A retrospective study in patients with symptoms of upper gastrointestinal bleeding outside regular working hours.内镜检查前评估能否预测上消化道活动性出血?一项针对非工作时间出现上消化道出血症状患者的回顾性研究。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2012 Nov-Dec;59(120):2508-11. doi: 10.5754/hge12123.
6
Is coffee ground vomiting important? Findings from a large bleeding unit database and outcomes at 30 days.咖啡渣样呕吐重要吗?一项大型出血病房数据库研究结果及 30 天转归
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Jul;32(7):797-803. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001701.
7
Severity and Outcomes of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding With Bloody Vs. Coffee-Grounds Hematemesis.呕血为血便与咖啡渣样时上消化道出血的严重程度和结局。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Mar;113(3):358-366. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2018.5. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
8
Evaluation of scoring models for identifying the need for therapeutic intervention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A new prediction score model for Japanese patients.用于识别上消化道出血治疗干预需求的评分模型评估:一种针对日本患者的新预测评分模型。
Dig Endosc. 2016 Nov;28(7):714-721. doi: 10.1111/den.12666. Epub 2016 May 3.
9
Hematemesis in Infants: The First Evidence-Based Score to Predict the Need for Timely Endoscopy.婴儿呕血:首个基于证据的预测及时内镜检查需求的评分系统
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2022 May 1;38(5):e1245-e1250. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002579. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
10
Nasogastric aspiration and lavage in emergency department patients with hematochezia or melena without hematemesis.急诊科以血便或黑便而无呕血为特征的患者行鼻胃管抽吸和灌洗。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Feb;17(2):126-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00609.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk stratification and scoring systems in upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding: review of performance and limitations in the emergency department.上消化道和下消化道出血的风险分层与评分系统:急诊科的性能与局限性综述
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 20;12:1564015. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1564015. eCollection 2025.