Bos Fionneke M, Schreuder Marieke J, George Sandip V, Doornbos Bennard, Bruggeman Richard, van der Krieke Lian, Haarman Bartholomeus C M, Wichers Marieke, Snippe Evelien
Department of Psychiatry, Rob Giel Research Center, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Psychiatry, Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation (ICPE), University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Int J Bipolar Disord. 2022 Apr 9;10(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s40345-022-00258-4.
In bipolar disorder treatment, accurate episode prediction is paramount but remains difficult. A novel idiographic approach to prediction is to monitor generic early warning signals (EWS), which may manifest in symptom dynamics. EWS could thus form personalized alerts in clinical care. The present study investigated whether EWS can anticipate manic and depressive transitions in individual patients with bipolar disorder.
Twenty bipolar type I/II patients (with ≥ 2 episodes in the previous year) participated in ecological momentary assessment (EMA), completing five questionnaires a day for four months (Mean = 491 observations per person). Transitions were determined by weekly completed questionnaires on depressive (Quick Inventory for Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report) and manic (Altman Self-Rating Mania Scale) symptoms. EWS (rises in autocorrelation at lag-1 and standard deviation) were calculated in moving windows over 17 affective and symptomatic EMA states. Positive and negative predictive values were calculated to determine clinical utility.
Eleven patients reported 1-2 transitions. The presence of EWS increased the probability of impending depressive and manic transitions from 32-36% to 46-48% (autocorrelation) and 29-41% (standard deviation). However, the absence of EWS could not be taken as a sign that no transition would occur in the near future. The momentary states that indicated nearby transitions most accurately (predictive values: 65-100%) were full of ideas, worry, and agitation. Large individual differences in the utility of EWS were found.
EWS show theoretical promise in anticipating manic and depressive transitions in bipolar disorder, but the level of false positives and negatives, as well as the heterogeneity within and between individuals and preprocessing methods currently limit clinical utility.
在双相情感障碍的治疗中,准确预测发作至关重要,但仍然困难。一种新的个性化预测方法是监测一般预警信号(EWS),这些信号可能在症状动态变化中显现。因此,EWS可以在临床护理中形成个性化警报。本研究调查了EWS是否能够预测双相情感障碍个体患者的躁狂和抑郁发作转换。
20名双相I型/II型患者(前一年发作≥2次)参与了生态瞬时评估(EMA),连续四个月每天完成五份问卷(每人平均491次观察)。通过每周完成的关于抑郁(抑郁症状快速自评量表)和躁狂(奥特曼躁狂自评量表)症状的问卷来确定发作转换。在17种情感和症状EMA状态的移动窗口中计算EWS(滞后1处自相关的增加和标准差)。计算阳性和阴性预测值以确定临床效用。
11名患者报告了1 - 2次发作转换。EWS的出现将即将发生的抑郁和躁狂发作转换的概率从32 - 36%提高到46 - 48%(自相关)和29 - 41%(标准差)。然而,EWS不存在不能被视为近期不会发生发作转换的迹象。最准确指示临近发作转换的瞬时状态(预测值:65 - 100%)是充满想法、担忧和激动。发现EWS效用存在较大个体差异。
EWS在预测双相情感障碍的躁狂和抑郁发作转换方面显示出理论前景,但假阳性和假阴性水平以及个体内部和个体之间的异质性以及预处理方法目前限制了其临床效用。