Center for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Aug 1;43(11):3585-3603. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25870. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
We investigate the reliability of individual differences of four quantities measured by magnetic resonance imaging-based multiparameter mapping (MPM): magnetization transfer saturation (MT), proton density (PD), longitudinal relaxation rate (R ), and effective transverse relaxation rate (R *). Four MPM datasets, two on each of two consecutive days, were acquired in healthy young adults. On Day 1, no repositioning occurred and on Day 2, participants were repositioned between MPM datasets. Using intraclass correlation effect decomposition (ICED), we assessed the contributions of session-specific, day-specific, and residual sources of measurement error. For whole-brain gray and white matter, all four MPM parameters showed high reproducibility and high reliability, as indexed by the coefficient of variation (CoV) and the intraclass correlation (ICC). However, MT, PD, R , and R * differed markedly in the extent to which reliability varied across brain regions. MT and PD showed high reliability in almost all regions. In contrast, R and R * showed low reliability in some regions outside the basal ganglia, such that the sum of the measurement error estimates in our structural equation model was higher than estimates of between-person differences. In addition, in this sample of healthy young adults, the four MPM parameters showed very little variability over four measurements but differed in how well they could assess between-person differences. We conclude that R and R * might carry only limited person-specific information in some regions of the brain in healthy young adults, and, by implication, might be of restricted utility for studying associations to between-person differences in behavior in those regions.
我们研究了通过基于磁共振成像的多参数映射(MPM)测量的四个量的个体差异的可靠性:磁化传递饱和(MT)、质子密度(PD)、纵向弛豫率(R )和有效横向弛豫率(R *)。在健康的年轻成年人中,采集了两个连续日的四个 MPM 数据集,每个日采集两个数据集。在第 1 天,没有重新定位,在第 2 天,参与者在 MPM 数据集之间重新定位。使用组内相关效应分解(ICED),我们评估了会话特异性、日特异性和残留测量误差源的贡献。对于全脑灰质和白质,所有四个 MPM 参数都表现出高重复性和高可靠性,这由变异系数(CoV)和组内相关系数(ICC)来表示。然而,MT、PD、R 和 R * 在可靠性在大脑区域之间的变化程度上差异显著。MT 和 PD 在几乎所有区域都具有高可靠性。相比之下,R 和 R * 在基底神经节以外的某些区域可靠性较低,以至于我们结构方程模型中的测量误差估计总和高于个体间差异的估计。此外,在这个健康年轻成年人样本中,四个 MPM 参数在四次测量中显示出非常小的变异性,但在评估个体间差异方面的表现却不同。我们得出结论,在健康年轻成年人的大脑某些区域,R 和 R * 可能只携带有限的个体特异性信息,因此在研究与那些区域的个体间差异相关的行为时,可能具有有限的用途。