• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于机器学习的问题解决治疗对抑郁症缓解的跨试验预测。

Cross-trial prediction of depression remission using problem-solving therapy: A machine learning approach.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University in Saint Louis, United States of America; Institute for Informatics, School of Medicine, Washington University in Saint Louis, United States of America; Deparment of Computer Science and Engineering, McKelvey School of Engineering, Washington University in Saint Louis, United States of America.

Deparment of Computer Science and Engineering, McKelvey School of Engineering, Washington University in Saint Louis, United States of America.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2022 Jul 1;308:89-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.015. Epub 2022 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.015
PMID:35398399
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Psychotherapy is a standard depression treatment; however, determining a patient's prognosis with therapy relies on clinical judgment that is subject to trial-and-error and provider variability.

PURPOSE

To develop machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict depression remission for patients undergoing 6 months of problem-solving therapy (PST).

METHOD

Using data from the treatment arm of 2 randomized trials, ML models were trained and validated on ENGAGE-2 (ClinicalTrials.gov, #NCT03841682) and tested on RAINBOW (ClinicalTrials.gov, #NCT02246413) for predictions at baseline and at 2-months. Primary outcome was depression remission using the Depression Symptom Checklist (SCL-20) score < 0.5 at 6 months. Predictor variables included baseline characteristics (sociodemographic, behavioral, clinical, psychosocial) and intervention engagement through 2-months.

RESULTS

Of the 26 candidate variables, 8 for baseline and 11 for 2-months were predictive of depression remission, and used to train the models. The best-performing model predicted remission with an accuracy significantly greater than chance in internal validation using the ENGAGE-2 cohort, at baseline [72.6% (SD = 3.6%), p < 0.0001] and at 2-months [72.3% (5.1%), p < 0.0001], and in external validation with the RAINBOW cohort at baseline [58.3% (0%), p < 0.0001] and at 2-months [62.3% (0%), p < 0.0001]. Model-agnostic explanations highlighted key predictors of depression remission at the cohort and patient levels, including female sex, lower self-reported sleep disturbance, lower sleep-related impairment, and lower negative problem orientation.

CONCLUSIONS

ML models using clinical and patient-reported data can predict depression remission for patients undergoing PST, affording opportunities for prospective identification of likely responders, and for developing personalized early treatment optimization along the patient care trajectory.

摘要

背景

心理疗法是抑郁症的标准治疗方法;然而,确定患者的治疗预后依赖于临床判断,而这种判断存在试错和提供者差异。

目的

开发机器学习(ML)算法来预测接受 6 个月问题解决治疗(PST)的患者的抑郁缓解情况。

方法

使用来自 2 项随机试验治疗臂的数据,在 ENGAGE-2(ClinicalTrials.gov,#NCT03841682)上训练和验证 ML 模型,并在 RAINBOW(ClinicalTrials.gov,#NCT02246413)上进行测试,以在基线和 2 个月时进行预测。主要结果是使用抑郁症状清单(SCL-20)评分<0.5 在 6 个月时达到抑郁缓解。预测变量包括基线特征(社会人口学、行为、临床、心理社会)和 2 个月时的干预参与度。

结果

在 26 个候选变量中,有 8 个基线变量和 11 个 2 个月变量可预测抑郁缓解,并用于训练模型。表现最佳的模型在使用 ENGAGE-2 队列进行内部验证时,在基线时[72.6%(SD=3.6%),p<0.0001]和在 2 个月时[72.3%(5.1%),p<0.0001],以及在使用 RAINBOW 队列进行外部验证时,预测缓解的准确率明显高于机会水平,在基线时[58.3%(0%),p<0.0001]和在 2 个月时[62.3%(0%),p<0.0001]。模型不可知的解释突出了队列和患者水平上抑郁缓解的关键预测因素,包括女性、自我报告的睡眠障碍程度较低、睡眠相关损害程度较低以及消极问题取向程度较低。

结论

使用临床和患者报告数据的 ML 模型可以预测接受 PST 的患者的抑郁缓解情况,为前瞻性识别可能的应答者提供了机会,并为沿着患者护理轨迹开发个性化的早期治疗优化提供了机会。

相似文献

1
Cross-trial prediction of depression remission using problem-solving therapy: A machine learning approach.基于机器学习的问题解决治疗对抑郁症缓解的跨试验预测。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Jul 1;308:89-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.015. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
2
Dynamic prediction of psychological treatment outcomes: development and validation of a prediction model using routinely collected symptom data.动态预测心理治疗结果:使用常规收集的症状数据开发和验证预测模型。
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Apr;3(4):e231-e240. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00018-2.
3
Predicting Adherence to Internet-Delivered Psychotherapy for Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety After Myocardial Infarction: Machine Learning Insights From the U-CARE Heart Randomized Controlled Trial.预测心肌梗死后抑郁症和焦虑症症状的互联网心理治疗依从性:来自U-CARE心脏随机对照试验的机器学习见解
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Oct 10;20(10):e10754. doi: 10.2196/10754.
4
Effect of Integrated Behavioral Weight Loss Treatment and Problem-Solving Therapy on Body Mass Index and Depressive Symptoms Among Patients With Obesity and Depression: The RAINBOW Randomized Clinical Trial.综合行为减肥治疗与问题解决疗法对肥胖合并抑郁症患者体重指数及抑郁症状的影响:RAINBOW随机临床试验
JAMA. 2019 Mar 5;321(9):869-879. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.0557.
5
Optimizing precision medicine for second-step depression treatment: a machine learning approach.优化第二步抑郁症治疗的精准医学:一种机器学习方法。
Psychol Med. 2024 Jul;54(10):2361-2368. doi: 10.1017/S0033291724000497. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
6
Early changes in neural circuit function engaged by negative emotion and modified by behavioural intervention are associated with depression and problem-solving outcomes: A report from the ENGAGE randomized controlled trial.负面情绪引发的神经回路功能早期变化及行为干预的调节与抑郁和问题解决结局相关:来自 ENGAGE 随机对照试验的报告。
EBioMedicine. 2021 May;67:103387. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103387. Epub 2021 May 17.
7
Cross-trial prediction of treatment outcome in depression: a machine learning approach.抑郁症治疗结果的跨试验预测:一种机器学习方法。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Mar;3(3):243-50. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00471-X. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
8
Effect of Telehealth Treatment by Lay Counselors vs by Clinicians on Depressive Symptoms Among Older Adults Who Are Homebound: A Randomized Clinical Trial.远程医疗治疗师与临床医生对居家老年人抑郁症状的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2015648. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15648.
9
Evaluation of a Machine Learning Model Based on Pretreatment Symptoms and Electroencephalographic Features to Predict Outcomes of Antidepressant Treatment in Adults With Depression: A Prespecified Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.基于预处理症状和脑电图特征的机器学习模型评估对抑郁症成年患者抗抑郁治疗结局的预测:一项随机临床试验的预设二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e206653. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.6653.
10
Modifiable predictors of nonresponse to psychotherapies for late-life depression with executive dysfunction: a machine learning approach.可改变的预测因子对伴有执行功能障碍的老年期抑郁症的心理治疗反应不佳:一种机器学习方法。
Mol Psychiatry. 2021 Sep;26(9):5190-5198. doi: 10.1038/s41380-020-0836-z. Epub 2020 Jul 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine learning approaches in the therapeutic outcome prediction in major depressive disorder: a systematic review.机器学习方法在重度抑郁症治疗结果预测中的应用:一项系统综述
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 13;16:1588963. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1588963. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessing the impact of AI on physician decision-making for mental health treatment in primary care.评估人工智能对基层医疗中精神健康治疗的医生决策的影响。
Npj Ment Health Res. 2025 May 10;4(1):16. doi: 10.1038/s44184-025-00124-y.
3
Evaluating the Clinical Validity and Reliability of Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Diagnostic Tools in Neuropsychiatric Disorders.
评估人工智能诊断工具在神经精神疾病中的临床有效性和可靠性。
Cureus. 2024 Oct 16;16(10):e71651. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71651. eCollection 2024 Oct.
4
Prediction of adolescent depression from prenatal and childhood data from ALSPAC using machine learning.使用机器学习从 ALSPAC 的产前和儿童时期数据预测青少年抑郁。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 7;14(1):23282. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72158-9.