Zou Wanjie, Huang Honglan, Wu Huadong, Cao Yuandong, Lu Wei, He Yuyong
Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition/Engineering Research Center of Feed Development, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, China.
Forest Institution, Jiangxi Environmental Engineering Vocational College, Ganzhou, China.
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Mar 24;9:808846. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.808846. eCollection 2022.
This experiment was conducted to compare the antibacterial ability and to identify the antibacterial components of different fermented compound Chinese medicine feed additives in order to develop one fermented compound Chinese medicine feed additive product that can effectively alleviate metritis, vaginitis, and mastitis of sows. The Oxford cup method and double dilution method were used to compare the antibacterial ability of three fermented compound Chinese medicine feed additives (A, B, and C). UHPLC-QE-MS-based untargeted metabolomics was used to identify the antibacterial components of fermented compound Chinese medicine feed additives. Results showed that among fermented compound Chinese medicine feed additives A, B, and C, additive A had the strongest ability to inhibit the growth of , and . The MIC and MBC of additive A were the lowest for compared to that for the other three pathogens. The concentrations of 23 Chinese medicine ingredients (ellagic acid, guanine, camphor, L-valine, sinapine, dipropylphthalate, 3-hydroxy-5-isopropylidene-3,8-dimethyl-2,3,3a,4,5,8a-hexahydro-6(1H)-azulenone, 7-dihydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-8-[3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-2-yl]-6-(3,4,5-trihydroxyoxan-2-yl)chromen-4-one, acetylcholine, farrerol, pyrogallol, ethyl gallate, demethylwedelolactone, methyl gallate, kaempferide, gallic acid, eriodictyol, threonic acid, inositol, 3',4',7-trihydroxyflavanone, taxifolin, asiatic acid, and isorhamnetin) in additive A were significantly ( < 0.05 or < 0.01) higher than those in additive B, respectively. It is concluded that the mixture composed of 23 active components in fermented compound Chinese medicine feed additive A plays an important role in inhibiting the growth of , and .
本实验旨在比较不同发酵复方中药饲料添加剂的抗菌能力并鉴定其抗菌成分,以便开发出一种能有效缓解母猪子宫炎、阴道炎和乳腺炎的发酵复方中药饲料添加剂产品。采用牛津杯法和双倍稀释法比较三种发酵复方中药饲料添加剂(A、B和C)的抗菌能力。基于超高效液相色谱-四极杆-飞行时间质谱联用技术的非靶向代谢组学用于鉴定发酵复方中药饲料添加剂的抗菌成分。结果表明,在发酵复方中药饲料添加剂A、B和C中,添加剂A对[具体菌种1]、[具体菌种2]和[具体菌种3]生长的抑制能力最强。与其他三种病原体相比,添加剂A对[具体菌种1]的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)和最低杀菌浓度(MBC)最低。添加剂A中23种中药成分(鞣花酸、鸟嘌呤、樟脑、L-缬氨酸、芥子碱、邻苯二甲酸二丙酯、3-羟基-5-异亚丙基-3,8-二甲基-2,3,3a,4,5,8a-六氢-6(1H)-薁酮、7-二羟基-2-(4-羟基苯基)-8-[3,4,5-三羟基-6-(羟甲基)氧杂环戊-2-基]-6-(3,4,5-三羟基氧杂环戊-2-基)色原酮-4-酮、乙酰胆碱、杜鹃素、连苯三酚、没食子酸乙酯、去甲基wedelolactone、没食子酸甲酯、山柰酚、没食子酸、圣草酚、苏糖酸、肌醇、3',4',7-三羟基黄烷酮、紫杉叶素、积雪草苷和异鼠李素)的浓度分别显著高于添加剂B(P<0.05或P<0.01)。得出结论,发酵复方中药饲料添加剂A中由23种活性成分组成的混合物在抑制[具体菌种1]、[具体菌种2]和[具体菌种3]生长方面发挥着重要作用。