• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Effects of Behavioral Foundations and Business Strategy on Corporate Dividend Policy.行为基础与商业策略对公司股息政策的影响
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 23;13:849238. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.849238. eCollection 2022.
2
Dividend policy issues in the European pharmaceutical industry: new empirical evidence.欧洲制药行业股利政策问题:新的实证证据。
Eur J Health Econ. 2023 Jul;24(5):803-816. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01510-5. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
3
Effect of corporate social responsibility performance on dividend pay-out: Role of corporate governance quality.企业社会责任绩效对股息支付的影响:公司治理质量的作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 8;13:883952. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.883952. eCollection 2022.
4
Corporate dividend policy in the time of COVID-19: Evidence from the G-12 countries.新冠疫情时期的企业股息政策:来自G-12国家的证据。
Financ Res Lett. 2022 May;46:102493. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2021.102493. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
5
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on dividends.新冠疫情对股息的影响。
Financ Res Lett. 2021 Oct;42:101910. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101910. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
6
Are owners chalk and cheese in the context of dividend smoothing asymmetry?在股息平滑不对称的背景下,所有者是否截然不同?
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 18;13:969782. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.969782. eCollection 2022.
7
Impact of corporate governance and CEO remuneration on bank capitalization strategies and payout decision in income shocks period.公司治理与首席执行官薪酬对收入冲击时期银行资本策略及派息决策的影响
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 29;13:901868. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.901868. eCollection 2022.
8
Firms' COVID-19 Pandemic Exposure and Corporate Cash Policy: Evidence from China.企业的新冠疫情暴露与公司现金政策:来自中国的证据
Econ Model. 2022 Nov;116:105999. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2022.105999. Epub 2022 Aug 21.
9
Analysis of the Impact of Supply Chain Relationship Strategy on Corporate Cash Dividend Policy Based on Chinese Data.基于中国数据的供应链关系策略对公司现金股利政策影响的分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 30;10:902648. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.902648. eCollection 2022.
10
Corporate climate risk and stock market reaction to performance briefings in China.企业气候风险与中国业绩简报对股票市场的反应。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jul;29(35):53801-53820. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19479-2. Epub 2022 Mar 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Some tests of the effectiveness and functional attributes of Miles and Snow's strategic types.迈尔斯和斯诺战略类型的有效性及功能属性的一些测试。
Acad Manage J. 1983 Mar;26(1):5-26.
2
Organizational strategy, structure, and process.组织战略、结构与流程。
Acad Manage Rev. 1978 Jul;3(3):546-62.

行为基础与商业策略对公司股息政策的影响

The Effects of Behavioral Foundations and Business Strategy on Corporate Dividend Policy.

作者信息

Liao Wen-Ju, Lin Yu-En, Li Xin-Zhe, Chih Hsiang-Hsuan

机构信息

Newhuadu Business School, Minjiang University, Fuzhou, China.

Center for Quantitative Economics, Jilin University, Changchun, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 23;13:849238. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.849238. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.849238
PMID:35401304
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8984101/
Abstract

This study analyzes the influence of behavioral foundation factors and corporate strategic behavior on the formulation of corporate dividend policy. We use the Logit model and the OLS model for estimating the empirical model. The year- and industry-fixed effects are controlled in the model. We consider the behavioral foundations in three dimensions-ambiguity aversions, risk aversion, and loss aversion. The results show firms with high ambiguity or high risk infrequently pay dividends but firms with loss-averse behavior tend to pay dividends. This paper also provides evidence that a firms' business strategy influences its corporate dividend policy. Aggressive firms inhibit the payout of dividends. In additional tests, we find the results remain unchanged in those firms with high corporate governance or high growth opportunities.

摘要

本研究分析了行为基础因素和公司战略行为对公司股利政策制定的影响。我们使用Logit模型和OLS模型来估计实证模型。模型中控制了年份和行业固定效应。我们从三个维度考虑行为基础——模糊规避、风险规避和损失规避。结果表明,具有高模糊性或高风险的公司很少支付股息,但具有损失规避行为的公司倾向于支付股息。本文还提供了证据表明公司的商业战略会影响其公司股利政策。激进的公司会抑制股息的支付。在额外的测试中,我们发现在那些具有高公司治理水平或高增长机会的公司中,结果保持不变。