Wei Yufan, Yu Yanying, Ji Yashuang, Zhong Yuting, Min Ningning, Hu Huayu, Guan Qingyu, Li Xiru
School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Gland Surg. 2022 Mar;11(3):513-523. doi: 10.21037/gs-21-789.
Information is still controversial in the studies regarding the current optimal surgical management of phyllodes tumors (PTs) of the breast. Local recurrence (LR) may occur with an upgraded in the pathological grade, influencing the prognosis of patients with PT. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the association of LR risk with margin status and margin width which could have significant implications on the surgical management of PT.
Independent and comprehensive searches were performed by two authors through five databases including PubMed, Medline, Embase, ScienceDirect and Cochrane Library from January 1990 to October 2021. Studies investigating the association between margin width, margin status and LR rates were considered for inclusion. Study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan5.3 software, and statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the Chi-square test and quantified using the I statistic. Visual inspection of funnel plots was used to judge publication bias.
A total of 34 articles were included in this article, all of which with NOS scores above 5. Regardless of the PT grade, positive margin significantly increased the risk of LR [odds ratio (OR) 3.64, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.60-5.12]. No significant difference was found in the risk of LR between the margins <1 and ≥1 cm (OR 1.39, 95% CI: 0.67-2.92). For benign and borderline PTs, there were no significant differences of the LR risk between breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy (benign OR 0.68, 95% CI: 0.12-3.78; borderline OR 1.14, 95% CI: 0.29-4.51). While the LR risk was significantly increased by BCS for malignant PT (OR 2.77, 95% CI: 1.33-5.74).
Different surgical management strategies should be considered for different PT grades. BCS was a feasible option and margins <1 cm was not significantly associated with LR risk for all grade of PT. After BCS, benign PT with positive margin could adopt the "wait and watch" strategy with regular follow-up, while borderline and malignant PTs were expected to underwent re-excision to ensure negative margins. More studies are still needed to clarify and update the existing conclusions and improve the prognosis of PT patients.
关于目前乳腺叶状肿瘤(PTs)的最佳手术治疗,相关研究中的信息仍存在争议。局部复发(LR)可能随着病理分级的升高而出现,影响PT患者的预后。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在研究LR风险与切缘状态及切缘宽度之间的关联,这可能对PT的手术治疗具有重要意义。
两位作者于1990年1月至2021年10月通过五个数据库进行独立且全面的检索,包括PubMed、Medline、Embase、ScienceDirect和Cochrane图书馆。纳入研究切缘宽度、切缘状态与LR率之间关联的研究。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)评估研究质量。使用RevMan5.3软件进行荟萃分析,并使用卡方检验评估统计异质性,使用I统计量进行量化。通过漏斗图的直观检查来判断发表偏倚。
本文共纳入34篇文章,所有文章的NOS评分均高于5分。无论PT分级如何,切缘阳性均显著增加LR风险[比值比(OR)3.64,95%置信区间(CI):2.60 - 5.12]。切缘<1 cm与≥1 cm之间的LR风险无显著差异(OR 1.39,95% CI:0.67 - 2.92)。对于良性和交界性PTs,保乳手术(BCS)和乳房切除术之间的LR风险无显著差异(良性OR 0.68,95% CI:0.12 - 3.78;交界性OR 1.14,95% CI:0.29 - 4.51)。而对于恶性PT,BCS显著增加LR风险(OR 2.77,95% CI:1.33 - 5.74)。
对于不同分级的PT应考虑不同的手术治疗策略。BCS是一种可行的选择,切缘<1 cm与所有分级PT的LR风险无显著关联。BCS后,切缘阳性的良性PT可采取“观察等待”策略并定期随访,而交界性和恶性PTs则应进行再次切除以确保切缘阴性。仍需要更多研究来阐明和更新现有结论,改善PT患者的预后。