Gromisch Elizabeth S, Turner Aaron P, Neto Lindsay O, Haselkorn Jodie K, Raskin Sarah A
Mandell Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Mount Sinai Rehabilitation Hospital, Trinity Health Of New England, Hartford, CT, USA.
Department of Rehabilitative Medicine, Frank H. Netter MD School of Medicine, Quinnipiac University, North Haven, CT, USA.
Clin Neuropsychol. 2023 Feb;37(2):371-386. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2022.2062451. Epub 2022 Apr 10.
Difficulties with prospective memory (PM) are not routinely assessed in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) even though they can impact daily functioning. This study aimed to examine the preliminary criterion and ecological validity of a highly abbreviated Memory for Intentions Test (MIST) intended to serve as an initial screening of PM in persons with MS. Participants (n = 112) were classified as impaired if they performed 1.5 standard deviations below the normative mean on the MIST. Individual MIST trials with adequate difficulty and discriminability were examined using receiver operating characteristic analyses, with their classification accuracies, sensitivities, and specificities compared to each other. Regressions were run to evaluate their ecological validity, with appointment attendance and employment as the outcomes. Two trials had a classification accuracy of ≥80%: Trial 3 (79% sensitivity, 84% specificity) and Trial 4 (57% sensitivity, 91% specificity). These two trials had comparable specificity (p=.127), with Trial 3 having slightly higher sensitivity (p=.083). Only Trial 4 was significantly associated with appointment attendance (b = 1.63, p=.047) and unemployment (aOR = 11.20, p=.027). Trial 4 of the MIST, a verbal task with a time-based cue that requires participants to complete a pre-specified response after a 15-minute delay, has the potential to be a screener for PM.
尽管前瞻性记忆(PM)困难会影响日常生活功能,但在多发性硬化症(MS)患者中,通常不会对其进行常规评估。本研究旨在检验一种高度简化的意图记忆测试(MIST)的初步标准和生态效度,该测试旨在对MS患者的PM进行初步筛查。如果参与者在MIST上的表现低于常模均值1.5个标准差,则被归类为受损。使用受试者工作特征分析来检验具有足够难度和区分度的单个MIST试验,并比较它们的分类准确率、敏感性和特异性。进行回归分析以评估它们的生态效度,将预约就诊和就业情况作为结果。两项试验的分类准确率≥80%:试验3(敏感性79%,特异性84%)和试验4(敏感性57%,特异性91%)。这两项试验的特异性相当(p = 0.127),试验3的敏感性略高(p = 0.083)。只有试验4与预约就诊(b = 1.63,p = 0.047)和失业显著相关(调整后比值比 = 11.20,p = 0.027)。MIST的试验4是一项基于时间提示的语言任务,要求参与者在延迟15分钟后完成预先指定的反应,它有可能成为PM的筛查工具。