Hand and Microsurgery Centre, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seikeikai Hospital, Japan.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baba Memorial Hospital, Japan.
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2022 Apr;27(2):345-351. doi: 10.1142/S2424835522500412. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
Multiple treatment protocols have been described in literature for the treatment of terrible triad injury (TTI) of the elbow. We believe that repair of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) should be performed in preference to repair of a small coronoid fracture if the elbow is unstable after fixation/replacement of the radial head and repair of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL). The aim of this study is to report the outcomes of surgical treatment of patients with TTI associated with a small coronoid fracture in whom the coronoid fracture was not addressed. This study is a retrospective case series of 12 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for acute TTI with a small coronoid fracture (9 Regan-Morrey type I and 3 Regan-Morrey type II). Ten patients had complete MCL injuries. All patients underwent repair of the torn LCL and MCL and treatment of the radial head. The coronoid fracture was not surgically treated. At the final follow-up, the range of motion, degree of flexion contracture, Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) were measured. The mean follow-up period was 13.5 months. At the final follow-up, the mean arc of elbow flexion was 132° and the mean flexion contracture was 10°. The mean arc of forearm rotation was 148°. None of the patients demonstrated elbow instability. The mean MEPS was 92.5 points with seven having excellent results and five having good results. The average DASH score was 11.2 points. Our results showed that good elbow stability, arc of motion and clinical outcomes could be achieved without repair of small coronoid fractures in the treatment of TTI. The repair of MCL injuries should be given priority over the fixation of small coronoid fractures to regain elbow stability. Level IV (Therapeutic).
文献中描述了多种治疗肘部三联征(TTI)的治疗方案。我们认为,如果在修复桡骨头和修复外侧副韧带(LCL)后肘部不稳定,应优先修复内侧副韧带(MCL),而不是修复小冠状突骨折。本研究旨在报告 12 例伴有小冠状突骨折的 TTI 患者手术治疗的结果,这些患者未处理冠状突骨折。这是一项连续 12 例接受急性 TTI 伴小冠状突骨折(9 例 Regan-Morrey Ⅰ型和 3 例 Regan-Morrey Ⅱ型)手术治疗的回顾性病例系列研究。10 例患者有完全的 MCL 损伤。所有患者均行撕裂的 LCL 和 MCL 修复及桡骨头治疗。冠状突骨折未行手术治疗。末次随访时,测量关节活动度、屈曲挛缩程度、Mayo 肘功能评分(MEPS)和上肢残疾问卷(DASH)。平均随访时间为 13.5 个月。末次随访时,平均肘关节屈曲弧为 132°,平均屈曲挛缩为 10°。平均前臂旋转弧为 148°。无一例患者出现肘关节不稳定。平均 MEPS 为 92.5 分,7 例优,5 例良。平均 DASH 评分为 11.2 分。我们的结果表明,在治疗 TTI 时,不修复小冠状突骨折也可以获得良好的肘关节稳定性、活动度和临床结果。修复 MCL 损伤应优先于固定小冠状突骨折以恢复肘关节稳定性。IV 级(治疗)。